Acceptance Review Sample Clauses

The Acceptance Review clause establishes a formal process for evaluating and approving deliverables or work completed under a contract. Typically, this clause outlines a specific period during which the receiving party must inspect the goods or services and either accept them or notify the provider of any deficiencies. For example, after delivery of a software product, the client may have 15 days to test and confirm it meets agreed-upon specifications. The core function of this clause is to ensure that deliverables meet contractual standards before final acceptance, thereby protecting the interests of the receiving party and providing a clear mechanism for addressing defects or non-conformance.
Acceptance Review. During the Acceptance Review Period, DIR and DIR Customers shall review and may further test each Milestone Deliverable, individually and collectively, to determine whether such item(s) contain any type of Noncompliance. Service Provider shall cooperate with such review and testing efforts, provide a technical environment to facilitate such review, and provide all applicable documentation that may assist in such review and testing.
View SourceView Similar (11)
Acceptance Review. During the Acceptance Review Period, OCA shall review and may further test each Deliverable, individually and/or collectively, to determine whether any such item contains any type of Noncompliance. Contractor shall cooperate with such review and testing efforts, provide access to a technical environment to facilitate such review, and provide all applicable documentation that may assist in such review and testing, including the results of any testing performed by Contractor pursuant to Section 4.5(a)(i).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Acceptance Review. The Document Foundation shall review the software to determine whether it meets the acceptance criteria and is fit for the intended purpose. The Document Foundation shall notify Developer in writing of the acceptance or rejection of the software within a specified period after the completion of the acceptance testing phase. If the software is accepted, the acceptance shall be deemed to have occurred upon The Document Foundation’s written notification.
View Source
Acceptance Review. Registry shall use commercially reasonable efforts to make available CSC 3.0 Phase 1 to CTIA for the purposes of a demonstration, review, evaluation and acceptance of the new form and functionality prior to the launch of CSC 3.0 Phase 1. NeuStar will provide a recommended date for such review with at least five (5) business days advance written notice to CTIA.
View Source
Acceptance Review. During the Acceptance Review Period, Triad and Eligible Recipients will review and may further test each Critical Testing Deliverable, individually and collectively, to determine whether such item(s) contain any type of Noncompliance. Supplier will reasonably cooperate with such review and testing efforts, provide a technical environment to facilitate such review, and provide all available documentation that will assist in such review and testing; provided, however that such documentation shall be reasonably adequate for such purposes. [**] Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by [**], has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
View Source
Acceptance Review. During the Acceptance Review Period, TxDOT shall review and may further test each Milestone Deliverable, individually and collectively, to determine whether any such item contains any type of Noncompliance. Service Provider shall cooperate with such review and testing efforts, provide a technical environment to facilitate such review, and provide all applicable documentation that may assist in such review and testing.
View Source
Acceptance Review. Each Service and Deliverable produced under an Order or a Change Order (as applicable) (each, a “Pending Item”) will be subject to the testing and verification procedures provided in such Order or Change Order (as applicable) (each, an “Acceptance Review”) to assess their conformance with the Specifications and/or the agreed upon acceptance criteria, as well as the other requirements of the GTCs and the SAs. However, if Specifications and/or acceptance criteria for the Pending Item have not been agreed in writing by both Parties, then the acceptability of the Pending Item will be based solely upon T-Mobile’s reasonable, good faith determination that the Pending Item satisfies its intended purpose.
View Source

Related to Acceptance Review

  • Acceptance; Rejection A holder of Notes may accept the offer to prepay made pursuant to this Section 8.8 by causing a notice of such acceptance to be delivered to the Company not later than 15 Business Days after receipt by such holder of the most recent offer of prepayment. A failure by a holder of Notes to respond to an offer to prepay made pursuant to this Section 8.8 shall be deemed to constitute rejection of such offer by such holder.

  • Acceptance Tests 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract. 11.2 Where the Contract provides for an acceptance procedure in the presence of both parties, at the successful completion of such procedure, the Purchaser shall issue the Supplier with an acceptance certificate which shall authorise the Supplier to invoice the Purchaser for any payment due on such acceptance. 11.3 The Purchaser shall at its discretion be entitled to issue and acceptancecertificate with reserves. The Supplier shall be obliged to remedy any non-conformities within the period set out in the acceptance certificate. Any payment which would otherwise have been due on acceptance may be withheld by the Purchaser in whole or part until the non- conformities underlying the reserves have been remedied.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings