ACNIELSEN SAMPLING METHODOLOGY Sample Clauses

The ACNIELSEN SAMPLING METHODOLOGY clause defines the procedures and standards by which data samples are collected and analyzed according to ACNielsen's established research practices. This typically involves specifying the sampling techniques, sample sizes, and quality controls used to ensure that the data accurately represents the target population. By outlining these methodological requirements, the clause ensures consistency, reliability, and credibility in the data collection process, thereby addressing concerns about data validity and comparability in research or reporting.
ACNIELSEN SAMPLING METHODOLOGY. ACNielsen Sampling Methodology ACNielsen hereby grants to NRI a fully-paid up, non-assignable (except as provided in Section 7.2) right to use and sublicense the ACNielsen Sampling Methodology in the eRatings Territory during the term of this Agreement in connection with the Internet Service. During the term of the Agreement, ACNielsen agrees not to provide Internet Service in the eRatings Territory or license the ACNielsen Sampling Methodology in the eRatings Territory to Entities to provide the Internet Service. NRI has the right to sublicense the ACNielsen Sampling Methodology only to NRI's wholly owned subsidiaries and Existing Joint Venture Entities on the same terms and conditions, including specific scope of use as set forth herein for NRI and to Future Joint Venture Entities with the prior written consent of ACNielsen, not to be unreasonably withheld, on the same terms and conditions, including specific scope of use as set forth herein for NRI. ACNielsen shall be a third-party beneficiary of each sublicense by NRI, but solely for the purpose of permitting ACNielsen to enforce the sublicense if NRI fails to do so within a reasonable time. ACNielsen shall be entitled to approve each sublicense to a Future Joint Venture Entity prior to its effectiveness (and shall be deemed to have approved it thirty (30) days after delivery of the sublicense to it if it does not respond to NRI within such time period).

Related to ACNIELSEN SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • Billing Method 2.6.1 To receive payment for services rendered pursuant to this contract the Contractor shall submit a fully completed invoice for work previously performed to: 2.6.2 At a minimum, the invoice shall detail the following information: 2.6.2.1 Unique invoice number; 2.6.2.2 Contractor’s name, address, and telephone number; 2.6.2.3 Date of invoice and/or billing period; 2.6.2.4 Applicable Contract No.;

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: