Adjudication of Disputes Unresolved by Mediation Clause Samples

The "Adjudication of Disputes Unresolved by Mediation" clause establishes a process for resolving disputes that remain unsettled after mediation efforts have failed. Typically, this clause specifies that if parties cannot reach an agreement through mediation within a set timeframe, the dispute will proceed to a more formal resolution method, such as arbitration or litigation. This ensures that unresolved conflicts are not left in limbo and provides a clear, structured path for final dispute resolution, thereby promoting certainty and minimizing prolonged disagreements.
Adjudication of Disputes Unresolved by Mediation. If the dispute has not been resolved through mediation in conformity with this Agreement within seventy- five (75) days of such appointment of a Magistrate Judge and the issue is a substantial breach of a material term of this Agreement, Plaintiffs may file a motion with the Court seeking specific enforcement of the terms of this Agreement, reinstatement of the claims for prospective relief in the lawsuit, or an extension of the duration of this Agreement by up to one additional year. It shall be Plaintiffs’ burden in making such a motion to demonstrate there has been a substantial breach of a material term. A substantial breach must be either (i) sufficiently frequent and widespread so as to be pervasive or (ii) a breach that deviates from a material provision in a way that denies an essential benefit of this Agreement to class members. Minimal or isolated failures, noncompliance with mere technicalities, failure to give “full consideration” to the experts’ or plaintiffs’ input, or temporary failure to comply during a period of otherwise sustained compliance will not constitute a substantial breach of a material term.

Related to Adjudication of Disputes Unresolved by Mediation

  • Mediation of Disputes The parties shall endeavor in good faith to settle within 90 days any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof through mediation with JAMS, Endispute or similar organizations. If the controversy or claim is not resolved within 90 days, the parties shall be free to pursue other legal remedies in law or equity.

  • Arbitration of Disputes Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof or otherwise arising out of the Executive’s employment or the termination of that employment (including, without limitation, any claims of unlawful employment discrimination whether based on age or otherwise) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be settled by arbitration in any forum and form agreed upon by the parties or, in the absence of such an agreement, under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) in Boston, Massachusetts in accordance with the Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the AAA, including, but not limited to, the rules and procedures applicable to the selection of arbitrators. In the event that any person or entity other than the Executive or the Company may be a party with regard to any such controversy or claim, such controversy or claim shall be submitted to arbitration subject to such other person or entity’s agreement. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. This Section 8 shall be specifically enforceable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 8 shall not preclude either party from pursuing a court action for the sole purpose of obtaining a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction in circumstances in which such relief is appropriate; provided that any other relief shall be pursued through an arbitration proceeding pursuant to this Section 8.

  • Settlement of Disputes; Arbitration All claims by the Executive for benefits under this Agreement shall be directed to and determined by the Board of Directors of the Company and shall be in writing. Any denial by the Board of Directors of a claim for benefits under this Agreement shall be delivered to the Executive in writing and shall set forth the specific reasons for the denial and the specific provisions of this Agreement relied upon. The Board of Directors shall afford a reasonable opportunity to the Executive for a review of the decision denying a claim. Any further dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with this Agreement shall be settled exclusively by arbitration in Boston, Massachusetts, in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. Judgment may be entered on the arbitrator's award in any court having jurisdiction.

  • Mediation and Arbitration of Disputes An Addendum requiring the Mediation and/or the Arbitration of all disputes between the Parties and/or Brokers arising out of this Lease þ is ¨ is not attached to this Lease. LESSOR AND LESSEE HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND REVIEWED THIS LEASE AND EACH TERM AND PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND BY THE EXECUTION OF THIS LEASE SHOW THEIR INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT THERETO. THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE THAT, AT THE TIME THIS LEASE IS EXECUTED, THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE ARE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE AND EFFECTUATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF LESSOR AND LESSEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES. ATTENTION: NO REPRESENTATION OR RECOMMENDATION IS MADE BY THE AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION OR BY AN BROKER AS TO THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY, LEGAL EFFECT, OR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE OR THE TRANSACTION TO WHICH I RELATES. THE PARTIES ARE URGED TO: 1. SEEK ADVICE OF COUNSEL AS TO THE LEGAL AND TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE. 2. RETAIN APPROPRIATE CONSULTANTS TO REVIEW AND INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES. SAID INVESTIGATION SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, THE ZONING OF THE PREMISES, THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, THE CONDITION OF THE ROOF AND OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND THE SUITABILITY OF THE PREMISES FOR LESSEE’S INTENDED USE. WARNING: IF THE PREMISES IS LOCATED IN A STATE OTHER THAN CALIFORNIA, CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE MAY NEED TO BE REVISED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE IN WHICH THE PREMISES IS LOCATED. The parties hereto have executed this Lease at the place and on the dates specified above their respective signatures. Executed at: San Jose, California on: October 26, 2000 Executed at: Cupertino, California on: October 26, 2000 By LESSOR: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ Trust By LESSOR: Nextest Systems Corporation By: /s/ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ By: /s/ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Name Printed: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ Name Printed: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Title: Trustee Title: CEO By: By: /s/ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Name Printed: Name Printed: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Title: Title: CFO Address: ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Address: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Telephone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Facsimile: ( ) Facsimile: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Federal ID No. Federal ID No. ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (EIN)

  • GOVERNING LAW; DISPUTES SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION All disputes arising under this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The parties to this agreement will submit all disputes arising under this agreement to arbitration in Boston, Massachusetts before a single arbitrator of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). The arbitrator shall be selected by application of the rules of the AAA, or by mutual agreement of the parties, except that such arbitrator shall be an attorney admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. No party to this agreement will challenge the jurisdiction or venue provisions as provided in this section. No party to this agreement will challenge the jurisdiction or venue provisions as provided in this section. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the party from obtaining an injunction.