Anti-Doping Controls Sample Clauses

The Anti-Doping Controls clause establishes the requirement for parties, typically athletes or participants, to comply with anti-doping regulations and submit to drug testing. In practice, this means individuals may be subject to random or scheduled testing for prohibited substances, and must cooperate fully with the testing authorities, including providing samples and relevant information. The core function of this clause is to ensure fair competition and maintain the integrity of the event or activity by preventing the use of performance-enhancing drugs.
Anti-Doping Controls. The Event Venue shall include appropriate facilities to conduct Anti-Doping controls according to the FIS Anti-Doping Rules on the FIS Website. If the event is subject to Doping Controls (as determined by FIS), FIS pays for the Doping Control services carried out by the FIS-appointed Doping Control Agency, whilst the local Organising Committee will be responsible for the logistical costs of the Doping Control Officers on site, including accommodation and meals for two to four persons depending on whether urine and blood Testing will be carried out. The LOC is also requested to arrange for Chaperones to assist with the Doping Control operations (normally between 4 – 7): ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/inside- fis/governance/fis-anti-doping The FIS shall be free to withdraw the right to host the Event awarded to the NSA without any compensation or penalty to the NSA, if the country in which the Event shall take place, or the respective National Anti-Doping Agency has been ruled non-compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code and declared ineligible under the WADA International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories. FIS shall withdraw the hosting right as soon as possible (but no later than thirty (30) days) after the declaration of non-compliance with the World Anti-Doping Code has become enforceable. FIS shall be entitled to reimbursement of any Event-related payments already made to the Organizer and to full compensation.
View SourceView Similar (21)
Anti-Doping Controls. The Event Venue shall include appropriate facilities to conduct Anti-Doping controls according to the FIS Anti-Doping Rules on the FIS Website. If the event is subject to Doping Controls (as determined by FIS), FIS pays for the Doping Control services carried out by the FIS-appointed Doping Control Agency, whilst the local Organising Committee will be responsible for the logistical costs of the Doping Control Officers on site, including accommodation and meals for two to four persons depending on whether urine and blood Testing will be carried out. The LOC is also requested to arrange for Chaperones to assist with the Doping Control operations (normally between 4 – 7): ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/inside-fis/governance/fis-anti-doping The FIS shall be free to withdraw the right to host the Event awarded to the NSA without any compensation or penalty to the NSA, if the country in which the Event shall take place, or the respective National Anti-Doping Agency has been ruled non- compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code and declared ineligible under the WADA International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories. FIS shall withdraw the hosting right as soon as possible (but no later than thirty (30) days) after the declaration of non-compliance with the World Anti-Doping Code has become enforceable. FIS shall be entitled to reimbursement of any Event-related payments already made to the Organizer and to full compensation. The Event Venue shall include appropriate facilities to conduct Anti-Doping controls according to the FIS Anti-Doping Rules on the FIS Website. If the event is subject to Doping Controls (as determined by FIS), FIS pays for the Doping Control services carried out by the FIS-appointed Doping Control Agency, whilst the local Organising Committee will be responsible for the lositical costs of the Doping Control Officers on site, including accommodation and meals for two to four persons depending on whether urine and blood Testing will be carried out. The LOC is also requested to arrange for Chaperones to assist with the Doping Control operations (normally between 4 – 7):
View SourceView Similar (8)
Anti-Doping Controls. The LOC is responsible for conducting the doping controls for in-Competition testing at all medal events of the Competitions at the FIS Championships (up to six (6) tests per medal event of the Competitions as defined in the FIS test distribution plan and FIS instructions for in-Competition testing at FIS World Championships). FIS will appoint (as is does at the FIS World Cup events) a service provider (national anti-doping agency or private sample collection provider) to carry out the doping controls after having consulted with the LOC. Such service agency will meet the World Anti-Doping Code, World Anti-Doping Agency’s International Standards’ and FIS Anti- Doping Rules’ requirements. The relevant documents can be found with the following link to the relevant sections on the FIS website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/inside- fis/governance/fis-anti-doping. All costs relating to the provision of doping controls (up to six (6) tests per Competition (medal event only) shall be borne by the LOC and will be invoiced to the LOC by FIS after the end of the FIS Championships. For clarification, all additional tests above the six (6) per Competition (medal event only) will be covered by FIS (which allows on the one hand the LOC to plan financially and on the other hand FIS to implement an intelligent programme with short notice adaptations in terms of numbers and analyses). The LOC, after consultation with FIS and the service provider, shall provide all facilities for doping controls (such as the doping control station incl. office space, transportation, accommodation, accreditation, full board, etc) and all other obligations (e.g. chaperones). Additional accommodation for the doping control personnel (up to four (4) rooms) carrying out out-of-Competition testing prior to the event (e.g. four (4) days prior to opening ceremony) shall be provided by the LOC, if applicable (as per FIS test distribution plan). FIS shall be free to withdraw the right to host the FIS Championships awarded to the National Association and the City, without any compensation or penalty to the National Association, the City and/or the LOC, if the country in which the FIS Championships shall take place, or the respective national anti-doping agency has been ruled non- compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code and declared ineligible under the WADA International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories. FIS shall withdraw the hosting right as soon as possible (but no later than thirty (30) d...
View Source

Related to Anti-Doping Controls

  • Accounting Controls The Company and its Subsidiaries maintain systems of “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act Regulations) that comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act and have been designed by, or under the supervision of, their respective principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including, but not limited to, internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any material weaknesses in its internal controls. The Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company have been advised of: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are known to the Company’s management and that have adversely affected or are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud known to the Company’s management, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

  • Access Controls a. Authorized Access - DST shall have controls that are designed to maintain the logical separation such that access to systems hosting Fund Data and/or being used to provide services to Fund will uniquely identify each individual requiring access, grant access only to authorized personnel based on the principle of least privileges, and prevent unauthorized access to Fund Data. b. User Access - DST shall have a process to promptly disable access to Fund Data by any DST personnel who no longer requires such access. DST will also promptly remove access of Fund personnel upon receipt of notification from Fund.

  • S▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the S▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

  • Internal Accounting Controls The Company and each of its Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient, in the judgment of the Company’s board of directors, to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.

  • ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.