Application Assessment Clause Samples

Application Assessment. Applications shall be assessed based on the following criteria: 18.08.1 the merit of the proposed project, program of work or study; 18.08.2 the anticipated significance of the proposed project, program of work or study to both the applicant and the Institute; 18.08.3 the feasibility of concluding the project, program of work or study, as described; 18.08.4 confirmation that the project, program of work or study is beyond the scope of normal employment expectations; 18.08.5 achievement of Faculty Objectives and Responsibilities as described in Article 12.
View SourceView Similar (12)
Application Assessment. Applications for Educational Leave shall be assessed by the Sabbatical and Educational Leave Committee based on the following criteria: 20.11.6.1 the anticipated significance and relevance of the proposed program of study to both the applicant and the University; 20.11.6.2 the feasibility of concluding the program of study; 20.11.6.3 confirmation that the program of study cannot be completed while maintaining employment workload; 20.11.6.4 achievement of Faculty Objectives and Responsibilities as described in Article 13.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Application Assessment. When assessing the repayment ability of consumers the creditors should :
View SourceView Similar (2)
Application Assessment. When assessing the repayment ability of consumers the creditors should : (i) Assess the completeness of the financial information submitted by the consumer, and (ii) critically assess the reasonableness of the data presented in the financial information submitted by the consumer. (i) The credit analysts have the responsibility of performing a thorough assessment of the financial situation of the consumer and to clearly justify their proposal to approve or decline the application for granting credit. (ii) The credit analysts and the credit approving authorities must take into account the creditor’s credit policy, the creditor’s risk appetite, concentration limits and risk diversification efforts, as well as the relevant directives and circulars issued by the Central Bank. (iii) The credit analysts and the credit approving authorities, when assessing a credit application must:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Application Assessment. All applications will be assessed based on the application criteria outlined in section 5 below. eSafety may contact an applicant during the assessment process to request additional information or to clarify aspects of an application. Upon satisfying the assessment criteria and all other mandatory requirements, a successful TEP candidate will be invited to participate in an online CoP session. These will be held a minimum of four times per financial year to align with eSafety’s assessment periods. TEP candidates are encouraged to make provision for all of their presenters and/or content developers to attend CoP sessions. However, they may also choose to be represented by one person only. That person must have the ability to influence TEP program content and contribute to CoP discussions. That person should also be able to both update the CoP on recent observations/trends relating to online safety or their programs and report back within their organisation on the content of the CoP.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Application Assessment. Applications shall be assessed based on the following criteria: 21.08.1 the merit of the proposed project, program of work or study; 21.08.2 the anticipated significance of the proposed project, program of work or study to both the applicant and the University; 21.08.3 the feasibility of engaging in the project, program of work or study, as described; 21.08.4 achievement of Faculty Objectives and Responsibilities as described in Article 13. 21.08.5 the length of time since the faculty member’s last sabbatical. Faculty who have not received a sabbatical for more than six years will be prioritized.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Application Assessment. (a) An administrative eligibility check is performed immediately after the end of the Call of Application by the Coordinating Institution, or by the Japanese Coordinating Institution for TUT students applying through the Japanese Coordinating Institution. This eligibility check covers: a. respect of application deadline; b. completeness of the application file; c. eligibility of the candidate in relation to the EMJMD/▇▇▇▇▇ criteria. Ineligible applicants will be notified of the outcome. (b) An academic eligibility check is performed by the Coordinating Institution (Academic Coordinator). (c) Complete eligible applications will be evaluated by IMLEX Academic and Management Board members, grading each criterion for each application. The selection criteria are: (d) Best applications are moderated by all Local Academic Coordinators of the Full Partners, using the same criteria and weighting system. (e) The final selection is agreed during an Academic and Management Board by full consensus of the four (4) Local Academic Coordinators on the basis of pre-evaluation and academic evaluation grades. Selection outcome and final rank is not based only on the averaged grade, but reflect the discussion and agreement of the Academic and Management Board. Similarly, the final selection of TUT nominees will also be agreed during the Board meeting. In the meeting, the following lists are defined: • a main list (best ranked successful applicants with an EMJMD scholarship or ▇▇▇▇▇/TUT financial support) and; • a reserve list (successful applicants with a Consortium scholarship and successful applicants without scholarships). (f) Final selection results will be sent to all applicants by email. a. a model of the Student Agreement; b. links to online guidelines and information on the Programme and to prepare arrival in Finland; c. Procedure to confirm participation, guidelines and deadlines for confirmation and inception of visa procedures; d. EMJMD/▇▇▇▇▇ scholarship attribution (and applicable amount); e. Academic / linguistic level of competence expected from the Students prior and during the f. Consortium scholarship attribution; g. information regarding the management / use of the reserve list (in case of drop-out of Students in the main list); h. the procedure to follow far an appeal to the selection decision in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. (g) Non selected applicants will be notified by email. The email will include information on the procedure t...
View Source
Application Assessment. All Applications will be assessed by an expert panel of officers and moderated by independent industry representatives nominated by the Director General, Department of Mines and Petroleum. The panel will use the predefined assessment criteria specified in the online application. On completion of the assessment process all Applicants will be notified of the outcome of their application via email, prior to the public announcement of successful Applicants. Successful Applicants will be formally notified in writing and of the date of the compulsory briefing. There will be no right of appeal.
View Source
Application Assessment. (a) An administrative eligibility check is performed immediately after the end of the Call of Application by the Coordinating Institution. This eligibility check covers: a. respect of application deadline; b. completeness of the application file; c. eligibility of the candidate in relation to the EMJMD criteria. Ineligible applicants will be informed immediately after the eligibility check and provided with the reasons of ineligibility and the procedure to follow for an appeal to the selection decision in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. Ineligible applicants will be notified of the outcome one (1) month after the end of the Call for Application at the latest. (b) An academic eligibility check is performed by the Coordinating Institution (Academic Coordinator). Applicants who are considered not complying with minimal academic requirements will received a personalized feedback immediately after the eligibility check and provided information on the appeal procedure in accordance with the terms laid down in article III.4.6. (c) Each eligible applications are first pre-evaluated by two
View Source

Related to Application Assessment

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors: a. Number or proportion of persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) eligible to be served or encountered by the program. b. Frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with the program. c. Nature and importance of the services provided. d. Local or frequently used resources available to the Contractor. This group-needs assessment will serve as the basis for the Contractor’s determination of “reasonable steps” and provide documentary evidence of compliance with Cal. Gov. Code § 11135 et seq.; 2 CCR 11140, 2 CCR 11200 et seq., and 22 CCR98300 et seq. 2. The Contractor shall prepare and make available a report of the findings of the group-needs assessment that summarizes: a. Methodologies used. b. The linguistic and cultural needs of non-English speaking or LEP groups. c. Services proposed to address the needs identified and a timeline for implementation. [22 CCR 98310] 3. The Contractor shall maintain a record of the group-needs assessment on file at the Contractor’s headquarters at all times during the term of this Agreement. [22 CCR 98310, 98313]

  • Report on Assessment of Compliance and Attestation (a) On or before March 15 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, unless no reporting obligation under the Exchange Act exists at such time with respect to the Trust Fund: (i) Each of the Servicer and the Trustee shall deliver to the Depositor and the Servicer a report (in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Depositor) regarding the Servicer's or the Trustee's, as applicable, assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria during the immediately preceding calendar year, as required under Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 of the Exchange Act and Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Such report shall be signed by an authorized officer of such Person and shall address each of the Servicing Criteria applicable to such party specified on a certification delivered to the Depositor concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. To the extent any of the Servicing Criteria are not applicable to such Person, with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving such Person and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Certificates, such report shall include such a statement to that effect. The Depositor and the Servicer, and each of their respective officers and directors shall be entitled to rely on upon each such servicing criteria assessment. (ii) Each of the Servicer and the Trustee shall deliver to the Depositor and the Servicer a report of a registered public accounting firm reasonably acceptable to the Depositor that attests to, and reports on, the assessment of compliance made by Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, and delivered pursuant to the preceding paragraphs. Such attestation shall be in accordance with Rules 1-02(a)(3) and 2-02(g) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including, without limitation that in the event that an overall opinion cannot be expressed, such registered public accounting firm shall state in such report why it was unable to express such an opinion. Such report must be available for general use and not contain restricted use language. To the extent any of the Servicing Criteria are not applicable to such Person, with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving such Person and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Certificates, such report shall include such a statement to that effect. (iii) The Servicer shall cause each Reporting Subcontractor to deliver to the Depositor an assessment of compliance and accountant's attestation as and when provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section 11.07. (iv) The Trustee shall cause each Reporting Subcontractor to deliver to the Depositor and the Servicer an assessment of compliance and accountant's attestation as and when provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section. (v) The Servicer shall execute (and the Servicer shall cause each Reporting Subcontractor to execute) a reliance certificate to enable the Certification Parties to rely upon each (A) annual compliance statement provided pursuant to Section 3.17, (B) annual report on assessments of compliance with servicing criteria provided pursuant to this Section 11.07 and (C) accountant's report provided pursuant to this Section 11.07 and shall include a certification that each such annual compliance statement or report discloses any deficiencies or defaults described to the registered public accountants of such Person to enable such accountants to render the certificates provided for in this Section 11.07. (vi) The Trustee shall execute (and the Trustee shall cause each Reporting Subcontractor to execute) a reliance certificate to enable the Certification Parties to rely upon each (A) annual report on assessments of compliance with servicing criteria provided pursuant to this Section 11.07 and (C) accountant's report provided pursuant to this Section 11.07 and shall include a certification that each such report discloses any deficiencies or defaults described to the registered public accountants of such Person to enable such accountants to render the certificates provided for in this Section 11.07. (b) In the event the Servicer, the Trustee or Reporting Subcontractor is terminated or resigns during the term of this Agreement, such Person shall provide documents and information required by this Section 11.07 with respect to the period of time it was subject to this Agreement or provided services with respect to the Trust Fund, the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans. (c) An assessment of compliance provided by a Subcontractor pursuant to Section 11.07(a)(iii) or (iv) need not address any elements of the Servicing Criteria other than those specified by the Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, pursuant to Section 11.07(a)(i).