Application for Re-evaluation of a Position Sample Clauses

The 'Application for Re-evaluation of a Position' clause establishes a process by which an employee or relevant party can formally request a review of their job classification, title, or compensation. Typically, this involves submitting a written application outlining the reasons for re-evaluation, which is then assessed by human resources or a designated committee. This clause ensures that employees have a clear and structured avenue to address concerns about their role or pay, promoting fairness and transparency in organizational job management.
Application for Re-evaluation of a Position. (a) An application for re-evaluation of a position may be made by the employee holding the position or by the supervisor of the position. Where a supervisor requests the re-evaluation of a position, the employee who holds the relevant position will be advised. (b) Prior to making an application for re-evaluation, an employee may request that their supervisor provide them with a written description of their current position that can be used for the purposes of the job evaluation (such as a position description). (c) Unless exceptional circumstances exist, position re-evaluations will be completed and the employee advised of the outcome within 8 weeks from the date the application and supporting documentation is received by Human Resources. (d) An employee who submits an application for a re-evaluation of their position will not be able to make a further application for a re-evaluation of their position until a period of 12 months has elapsed. (e) Where an existing position is re-evaluated to a higher level, the effective date of the re-evaluation will be the date of submission of the application for re- evaluation to the University, unless the Director, Human Resources (or nominee) can determine that the position has changed from an identifiable earlier date. (f) Where a decision is made not to reclassify a position, the Director, Human Resources (or nominee) will, upon request, provide written reasons for the decision or, if the employee requests, meet with the employee to discuss the outcome of the re-evaluation within a reasonable period following the decision being made. (g) Without limiting the University’s ability to change a position under clause 29.0 – Managing Change in the Workplace - of this Agreement, an application for re- evaluation under subclause 21.2(a) will only result in a position being reclassified to a higher level or no change to the current level.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Application for Re-evaluation of a Position. (a) If an employee is of the view that their level of work has so changed as to merit re-evaluation and a supervisor refuses to apply for such re-evaluation, the employee may have the position re-evaluated by Human Resources. (b) Where an existing position is re-evaluated to a higher level, the effective date of the re-evaluation will be the date of submission to the University, or an earlier date as agreed between the supervisor and the employee. (c) Without limiting the University’s ability to change a position under clause 29.0 – Managing Change in the Workplace - of this Agreement, an application for re- evaluation under subclause 21.2(a) will only result in a position being reclassified to a higher level or no change to the current level.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Application for Re-evaluation of a Position. (a) If an employee is of the view that their level of work has so changed as to merit re-evaluation and a supervisor refuses to apply for such re-evaluation, the employee may have the position re-evaluated by Human Resources. (b) Where an existing position is re-evaluated to a higher level, the effective date of the re- evaluation will be the date of submission to the University or an earlier date as agreed between the supervisor and the employee. (c) Without limiting the University’s ability to change a position under clause 24.3 of this Agreement, an application for re-evaluation under clause 17.2(a) above will only result in a position being reclassified to a higher level or no change to the current level.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Application for Re-evaluation of a Position

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Initiation of Appeal Following the entry of the Arbitration Award, either party (the “Appellant”) shall have a period of thirty (30) calendar days in which to notify the other party (the “Appellee”), in writing, that the Appellant elects to appeal (the “Appeal”) the Arbitration Award (such notice, an “Appeal Notice”) to a panel of arbitrators as provided in Paragraph 5.2 below. The date the Appellant delivers an Appeal Notice to the Appellee is referred to herein as the “Appeal Date”. The Appeal Notice must be delivered to the Appellee in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 4.1 above with respect to delivery of an Arbitration Notice. In addition, together with delivery of the Appeal Notice to the Appellee, the Appellant must also pay for (and provide proof of such payment to the Appellee together with delivery of the Appeal Notice) a bond in the amount of 110% of the sum the Appellant owes to the Appellee as a result of the Arbitration Award the Appellant is appealing. In the event an Appellant delivers an Appeal Notice to the Appellee (together with proof of payment of the applicable bond) in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph 5.1, the Appeal will occur as a matter of right and, except as specifically set forth herein, will not be further conditioned. In the event a party does not deliver an Appeal Notice (along with proof of payment of the applicable bond) to the other party within the deadline prescribed in this Paragraph 5.1, such party shall lose its right to appeal the Arbitration Award. If no party delivers an Appeal Notice (along with proof of payment of the applicable bond) to the other party within the deadline described in this Paragraph 5.1, the Arbitration Award shall be final. The parties acknowledge and agree that any Appeal shall be deemed part of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate for purposes of these Arbitration Provisions and the Arbitration Act.