AREA MAPS INDEX Sample Clauses

AREA MAPS INDEX. A. Map 1 = Irrigation Controller B. Map 2 = Irrigation Controller C. Map 3 = Irrigation Controller D. Map 4 = Irrigation Controller E. Map 5 = Irrigation Controller F. Map 6 = Irrigation Controller G. Map 7 = Irrigation Controller H. Map 8 = Irrigation Controller I. Map 9 = Irrigation Controller J. Map 10 = Irrigation Controller K. Map 11 = Irrigation Controller L. Map 12 = Irrigation Controller 1) Payments for services rendered by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall not exceed $89,952 annually, or $179,904 total, for the initial 24-month term beginning January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2023. 2) Payment to CONTRACTOR shall be made on a monthly basis for work completed in the previous month. CONTRACTOR shall submit monthly invoices for one-twelfth (1/12) of the annual contract amount for services provided as described in Exhibit “A”. CONTRACTOR shall submit a separate invoice for any approved extra work completed during the previous month. 3) Any additional work required beyond that set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be mutually agreed to in writing by the CITY and CONTRACTOR, and shall be billed on a time and materials basis.
View Source
AREA MAPS INDEX. A. Map 1 B. Map 2 C. Map 3 D. Map 4 E. Map 5
View Source
AREA MAPS INDEX. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Boulevard, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road, Nephi Drive AM–1 Rustle Court, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Drive AM–2 ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇–▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ AM–4 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ AM–5 Cement Hill Road, Peppertree Drive AM–6 1) The total contract price for services rendered by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall not exceed $36,696.00 for the initial 12-month term, which is effective January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. 2) Payment shall be made to CONTRACTOR based on monthly progress ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and final invoice. Final invoice to be submitted on completion of scope of work set forth in Exhibit “A”. 3) Any additional meetings or work required beyond that set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be mutually agreed to by the CITY and CONTRACTOR, and shall be billed on a time and materials basis to the City of Fairfield. EXHIBIT “C” GENERAL PROVISIONS‌
View Source
AREA MAPS INDEX. Texas Street AM–1
View Source

Related to AREA MAPS INDEX

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Market Adjustment The parties to this Agreement recognize the appropriateness of market pay adjustments in rare instances for compelling reasons. To effectuate judgments in such cases, the President and AAUP Chapter President, in consultation, shall each name three (3) individuals to a university Market Evaluation Committee. Deans may submit recommendations for market pay adjustments with supporting written reasons to the Committee. Said Committee shall consult with the President concerning proposed market pay adjustments reporting its advice not later than May 15 in each year. Upon the favorable recommendation of the President and the BOR President, market pay adjustments may be approved effective at the beginning of that pay period including September 1 of the following year. Not more than one (1) market pay adjustment per one hundred (100) full-time members, or fraction thereof, may be recommended in any contract year. A member’s salary may not be increased beyond the maximum for the rank. Funding for this program shall be governed by Article 12.10.2.

  • Market Adjustments Neither this Article nor any other in this Collective Agreement prevents the Employer from using other funds to increase a Member’s salary in response to offers received from other employers or to accommodate other market forces.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.