Audit by Operator Sample Clauses

Audit by Operator. (a) Subject to clause 10.4(b), the Operator may at any time, at its cost and risk, audit any of the railway track and lines comprising the Network for the purpose of monitoring ARTC’s compliance with clause 6.1. (b) The Operator’s audit under clause 10.4(a) will: (i) be subject to the ability of ARTC to issue an Instruction to the Operator at any time during the audit to ensure the proper, efficient, safe and lawful use of and access to the Network by the Operator and other operators; (ii) be conducted in such a manner so that it does not cause any disruption to any service of any other operator granted access to the Network by ARTC or the provision of services by ARTC to such operators.
View SourceView Similar (19)
Audit by Operator. (a) Subject to clause 10.4(b), the Operator may at any time, at its cost and risk, audit any of the railway track and lines comprising the Network for the purpose of monitoring ARTC’s compliance with clause 6.1. (b) The Operator’s audit under clause 10.4(a) will:
View SourceView Similar (4)
Audit by Operator. (1) Subject to clause 8.6(2), the Operator may at any time, at its cost and risk, audit any of the railway track and lines comprising the Network for the purpose of monitoring GWAN’s compliance with the Service Quality Policy. (2) The Operator’s audit under clause 8.6(1) is: (a) subject to the ability of GWAN to issue an Instruction to the Operator at any time during the audit to ensure the proper, efficient, safe and lawful use of and access to the Network by the Operator and other operators; and (b) to be conducted in a manner that does not cause any disruption to any service of any other operator granted access to the Network by GWAN, or the provision of services by GWAN to such operators.
View Source
Audit by Operator. (a) Subject to clause 10.5(b), the Operator may at any time, at its cost and risk, appoint an Independent Auditor to audit any of the railway track and lines comprising the Network for the purpose of monitoring TfNSW’s compliance with clause 6.1. (b) The Operator’s audit under clause 10.5(a) shall: (1) provide TfNSW with 60 days written notice of the proposed inspection; (2) if required by TfNSW, be conducted under the supervision of TfNSW or its nominee and at a time that a representative of TfNSW or its nominee is available to conduct the inspection provided that TfNSW uses reasonable endeavours to make the representative available at a time that is reasonable and convenient to the Operator; (3) be subject to the ability of TfNSW to issue an Instruction to the Operator at any time during the audit to ensure the proper, efficient, safe and lawful use of and access to the Network by the Operator and Other Operators; and (4) be conducted in such a manner so that it does not cause any disruption to any service of any Other Operator granted access to the Network by TfNSW or the provision of services by TfNSW to such operators. (c) The Operator will provide TfNSW promptly with a copy of the audit findings of any audit carried out pursuant to clause 10.5(a).
View Source
Audit by Operator. ‌ (a) Subject to clause 10.5(b), the Operator may at any time, at its cost and risk, appoint an Independent Auditor to audit any of the railway track and lines comprising the Network for the purpose of monitoring TAHE’s compliance with clause 6.1.‌ (b) The Operator’s audit under clause 10.5(a) shall:‌ (1) provide TAHE with 60 days written notice of the proposed inspection; (2) if required by TAHE, be conducted under the supervision of TAHE or its nominee and at a time that a representative of TAHE or its nominee is available to conduct the inspection provided that TAHE uses reasonable endeavours to make the representative available at a time that is reasonable and convenient to the Operator; (3) be subject to the ability of TAHE to issue an Instruction to the Operator at any time during the audit to ensure the proper, efficient, safe and lawful use of and access to the Network by the Operator and Other Operators; and (4) be conducted in such a manner so that it does not cause any disruption to any service of any Other Operator granted access to the Network by TAHE or the provision of services by TAHE to such operators. (c) The Operator will provide TAHE promptly with a copy of the audit findings of any audit carried out pursuant to clause 10.5(a).
View Source

Related to Audit by Operator

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, inspection or investigation of the Grant Agreement and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency. B. As part of the services, Grantee must provide to HHS upon request a copy of those portions of Grantee's and its Subcontractors' internal audit reports relating to the services and Deliverables provided to the State under the Grant Agreement. C. Grantee shall include the requirement to provide to System Agency (and any of its duly authorized federal, state, or local authorities) internal audit reports related to this Grant Agreement in any Subcontract it awards. Upon request by System Agency, Grantee shall enforce this requirement against its Subcontractor. Further, Grantee shall include in any Subcontract it awards a requirement that all Subcontractor Subcontracts must also include these provisions.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CCH has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things: A. whether Project activities are consistent with those set forth in Exhibit A, the Grant Application, and the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement; B. the actual expenditure of state, local and/or private funds expended to date on the Project is in conformity with the amounts for each Budget line item as set forth in Exhibit B and that unpaid costs have been properly accrued; C. that Grantee is making timely progress with the Project, and that its project management, financial management and control systems, procurement systems and methods, and overall performance are in conformance with the requirements set forth in this Grant Agreement and are fully and accurately reflected in Project reports submitted to the State.

  • Independence of the Servicer For all purposes of this Agreement, the Servicer shall be an independent contractor and shall not be subject to the supervision of the Issuer, the Trust Collateral Agent, the Trustee or the Owner Trustee with respect to the manner in which it accomplishes the performance of its obligations hereunder. Unless expressly authorized by this Agreement or any other Basic Document, the Servicer shall have no authority to act for or represent the Issuer or the Owner Trustee in any way and shall not otherwise be deemed an agent of the Issuer or the Owner Trustee.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.