BID EVALUATION PROCESS Sample Clauses

BID EVALUATION PROCESS. The State shall review all Vendor responses to this IFB to confirm that they meet the specifications and requirements of the IFB. a) Bids are requested for the items as specified. The State reserves the right to reject any bid on the basis of fit, form and function as well as cost. All information furnished on this bid may be used as a factor in determining the award of this contract. b) Bids will be received from each responsive Vendor in a sealed envelope or package. c) All bids shall be received by the issuing agency not later than the date and time specified on the cover sheet of this IFB. d) At that date and time specified as the bid opening, the package containing the bids from each responding firm will be opened publicly and the name of the Vendor and the price(s) bid announced. e) The State shall review all Vendor responses to this IFB to confirm that they meet the specifications and requirements of the IFB. f) For all responses that pass the initial review process, the State will review and assess the Vendors’ pricing. The State may request additional formal responses or submissions from any or all Vendors for the purpose of clarification or to amplify the materials presented in any part of the bid. Vendors are cautioned, however, that the State is not required to request clarification, and often does not. Therefore, all bids should be complete and reflect the most favorable terms available from the Vendor. Prices bid cannot be altered or modified as part of a clarification. Vendors are cautioned that this is a request for offers, not an offer or request to contract, and the State reserves the unqualified right to reject any and all offers at any time if such rejection is deemed to be in the best interest of the State. The State reserves the right to reject all original offers and request one or more of the Vendors submitting bids within a competitive range to submit a best and final offer (BAFO), based on discussions and negotiations with the State, if the initial responses to the IFB have been evaluated and determined to be unsatisfactory. Upon completion of the evaluation process, the State will make award(s) based on the evaluation and post the award(s) to IPS under the IFB number for this solicitation. Award of a Contract to one Vendor does not mean that the other bids lacked merit, but that, all factors considered, the selected bid was deemed most advantageous and represented the best value to the State.
View SourceView Similar (3)
BID EVALUATION PROCESS. The City is requesting pricing on the following three (3) contract term options: 1. Option 1: One-year base term with four (4) additional one-year options
View Source
BID EVALUATION PROCESS. The City is requesting pricing on the following three (3) contract term options: 1. Option 1: One-year term 2. Option 2: Three-year term (paid annually) 3. Option 3: Three-year term (paid upfront) Term Option Details: In lieu of a one-year term (Option 1), the City is willing to commit to a three-year term paid annually at the beginning of each year (Option 2). The City is also willing to consider paying the three-year term upfront at the beginning of year 1 (Option 3). The three-year commitment option will be dependent upon the pricing provided by bidders. The three-year commitment, paid upfront, option will be dependent upon available budget and additional discount provided by bidders. Bidders must bid on all items in the Option 1 - One Year Commitment tab but are also encouraged to provide pricing on Options 2 and 3.
View Source
BID EVALUATION PROCESS. 1) Part – I (Bid Security): Bidders who have submitted the valid bid security as per the format shall be considered for further evaluation. Similarly, if the RFP document fee has not been deposited / submitted in case of downloaded forms the Bid shall be out rightly rejected.
View Source
BID EVALUATION PROCESS. 4.1.1 Evaluation will be based on the bidder meeting the eligibility criteria and subsequent evaluation of financial bid. It is mandatory for the bidder to fulfil all the eligibility criteria to be technically qualified and for being considered for opening of their Financial Bid and evaluation thereof. The bidder(s) with lowest financial quote (Fs) shall be considered for award of contract.
View Source

Related to BID EVALUATION PROCESS

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;