Business-IT Alignment Maturity Model Clause Samples

The Business-IT Alignment Maturity Model clause defines a framework for assessing how well an organization's information technology strategies and operations are integrated with its overall business objectives. Typically, this clause outlines various maturity levels—such as initial, managed, defined, quantitatively managed, and optimizing—each describing progressively advanced states of alignment between IT and business functions. By providing clear criteria and benchmarks for each level, the clause helps organizations identify their current alignment status and set goals for improvement. Its core practical function is to guide organizations in systematically enhancing collaboration and strategic coherence between business and IT, thereby improving efficiency, competitiveness, and value delivery.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Business-IT Alignment Maturity Model. Description: Business-IT alignment implies applying IT in a relevant, timely and appropriate way that in in line with business needs, goals and strategy. It has been one of the main concerns of both business and IT experts and there is even a field dedicated on this problem, Enterprise Architecture. Its relevance has been further elevated by evidence that IT can influence and enhance industries and markets. [11] Aim: Raise awareness of the alignment between business and IT in an organization. Scope: Generic for any organization that uses IT in their business. How to Assess: There is an assessment process to evaluate an organization, but there are no details on it. Term used to name of the Attributes: IT-business alignment criteria. Attributes (6): Communications Maturity; Competency/Value Measurement Maturity; Governance Maturity; Partnership Maturity; Scope & Architecture Maturity; Skills Maturity. Level Name Description 1 Initial/Ad-Hoc process Business and IT lack understanding; there are some technical measurements on competency and value. There are no formal processes, cost center and no reactive priorities. There is a conflict between IT and business as business sees IT as a cost of doing business. There is a traditional scope and architecture based on emails and accounting. Regarding skills, the IT takes risk and there is little reward. There is technical training.
Business-IT Alignment Maturity Model. ‌ Description: Business-IT alignment implies applying IT in a relevant, timely and appropriate way that in in line with business needs, goals and strategy. It has been one of the main concerns of both business and IT experts and there is even a field dedicated on this problem, Enterprise Architecture. Its relevance has been further elevated by evidence that IT can influence and enhance industries and markets. [11] 1 Initial/Ad-Hoc process Business and IT lack understanding; there are some technical measurements on competency and value. There are no formal processes, cost centre and no reactive priorities. There is a conflict between IT and business as business sees IT as a cost of doing business. There is a traditional scope and architecture based on emails and accounting. Regarding skills, the IT takes risk and there is little reward. There is technical training.

Related to Business-IT Alignment Maturity Model

  • Security of All Software Components Supplier will inventory all software components (including open source software) used in Deliverables, and provide such inventory to Accenture upon request. Supplier will assess whether any such components have any security defects or vulnerabilities that could lead to a Security Incident. Supplier will perform such assessment prior to providing Accenture with access to such software components and on an on-going basis thereafter during the term of the Agreement. Supplier will promptly notify Accenture of any identified security defect or vulnerability and remediate same in a timely manner. Supplier will promptly notify Accenture of its remediation plan. If remediation is not feasible in a timely manner, Supplier will replace the subject software component with a component that is not affected by a security defect or vulnerability and that does not reduce the overall functionality of the Deliverable(s).

  • Commercial Computer Software If performance involves acquisition of existing computer software, the following Company Exhibit is incorporated by reference: CCS Commercial Computer Software License (Company – July 2010).

  • Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Sayville Union Free School District and Sayville Union Free School Custodial and Maintenance Employees Unit, United Public Service Employees Union (UPSEU), Local 424 (2011) Employer Name: Sayville Union Free School District Union: Sayville Union Free School Custodial and Maintenance Employees Unit, United Public Service Employees Union (UPSEU) Local: 424 Effective Date: 07/01/2011 Expiration Date: 06/30/2015 PERB ID Number: 6131 Unit Size: 55 Number of Pages: 24 For additional research information and assistance, please visit the Research page of the Catherwood website - ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/library/research/ For additional information on the ILR School - ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ 55 People TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE Page XXII ANNUAL LEAVE DAYS 14 XXV BREAKS 18 XXVI CIVIL SERVICE LAW ARTICLE SECTION 75 18 XXVIII DURATION 19 XIV EMERGENCY WORK 11 XXI FOUL WEATHER CLOTHING 14 XI GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 9 XVI HIGHER JOB CLASSIFICATION 12 XVIII HOLIDAYS 13 XV HOLIDAY AND WEEKEND BUILDING CHECKS 12 V INSURANCE 4 X LAYOFF, DISPLACEMENT AND RECALL ORDER 8 VII MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 7 XXVII MISCELLANEOUS 19 XVII NOTICES OF PROMOTIONS 13 XIII OVERTIME 10 II PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 1 III PERSONNEL FILES 2 XXIV PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 18 XXIII RETIREMENT 16 IX STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS 7 XIX VACATIONS 13 XX VISITATION 14 IV WAGES 3 VI WORKERS' COMPENSATION 6 XII WORKWEEK 10 VIII WRITTEN BOARD POLICY 8 APPENDIX A 20 4/20/2016 AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of November 2013 between the SAYVILLE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the “District”) and United Public Service Employees Union, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, N.Y. 11779 (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”).

  • How Do I Get More Information? This Notice summarizes the Action, the terms of the Settlements, and your rights and options in connection with the Settlements. More details are in the Settlement Agreements, which are available for your review at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. The Settlement Website also has the Second Amended Complaint and other documents relating to the Settlements. You may also call toll-free ▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or write the Claims Administrator at: Financial Aid Antitrust Settlements, c/o Claims Administrator, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. To: Settlement Class Member Email Address From: Claims Administrator Subject: Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement – ▇▇▇▇▇, et al. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ University, et al. Please visit ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for more information. • The Court has preliminarily approved proposed settlements (“Settlements”) with the following ten schools: Brown University, the University of Chicago, the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Trustees of Dartmouth College, Duke University, Emory University, Northwestern University, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ University, Vanderbilt University, and Yale University (collectively the “Settling Universities”). • The Court has also preliminarily approved a class of students who attended one or more of the Settling Universities during certain time periods. This is referred to as the “Settlement Class,” which is defined in more detail below.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.