Capability Assessment Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Capability Assessment. Where Services Australia has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Capability Assessment. Where DHS has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Capability Assessment the process by which you contact all the Contractors qualified in a Lot to determine which are interested in bidding for your requirement. Catalogue – refers to the information provided by Contractors on the Government Procurement Service website including product details, pricing and the Contractor’s profile. Confidential Information – the information deemed confidential by you or the Contractor. Contract – the binding agreement between you and the Contractor for the provision of IT goods based on the Terms and Conditions of the Model Contract.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Capability Assessment. (a) Teachers who satisfy the eligibility requirements in clause 50.2 shall be subject to a Capability Assessment based on the following criteria: (b) The teacher demonstrates a clear understanding of, and contribution and commitment to the Quality Improvement Plan of the service. (c) The teacher must demonstrate a well-developed level of understanding of and developing capabilities relevant to the roles and responsibilities and professional standards of a Level 3 teacher in the following areas: (i) Pedagogical excellence and expert teaching skills; (ii) Comprehensive knowledge and practice in developing innovative programs and curriculum; (iii) An ability to respond to emerging trends and issues within early childhood education, their service and community; (iv) Provision of leadership and role modelling to other early childhood staff within the service; (v) Provision of expert advice and support to parents and the broader community in the development and delivery of early childhood education; and (vi) Actively pursues opportunities to advocate on behalf of children and the development and delivery of early childhood education by working collaboratively and effectively with appropriate groups in the broader community. (vii) Plays a significant role in leading and supporting programs determined by state and federal authorities.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Capability Assessment. In requesting the delegation, the Territorial Authority has provided NZTA with the capability assessment attached as Schedule V. Should any material factor (noted as such in the schedule) in the capability assessment change, the Territorial Authority shall notify NZTA in writing of the change within 7 days of such change together with any proposed action to alleviate any reduction in the Territorial Authority's capability arising from the change.
View Source
Capability Assessment. This assessment will be conducted to inventory those existing plans, policies, and procedures that the City has in place to temper the effect of hazards. This will include protective measures under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), building codes, zoning ordinances, completed or ongoing mitigation projects, and mitigation polices established in the general or comprehensive plans of participating jurisdictions. Technological and infrastructure vulnerabilities will also be noted in detail. Photographs of the vulnerabilities in Costa Mesa will be incorporated as appropriate or requested.
View Source
Capability Assessment. Trials for each Ship shall be carried out in accordance with Schedule 2 (Project Management Specification).
View Source
Capability Assessment. A Capability Assessment is not required by DMA 2000 and its implementing regulations. However, a Capability Assessment is recommended by Cal EMA/FEMA. As such URS will work with participating jurisdictions to complete tables which capture information regarding the following for each jurisdiction: ▪ Human and Technical Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Financial Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Legal and Regulatory Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Current, Ongoing, and Completed Hazard Mitigation Projects and Programs
View Source
Capability Assessment. As part of the Plan update and as required by Cal OES, Wood will evaluate the County’s and participating jurisdictions’ existing capabilities to mitigate risk and vulnerabilities from natural, technological, and manmade hazards. The Capability Assessment will identify existing legal and regulatory tools addressing each hazard; discuss any applicable past, present, and future hazard mitigation programs; and assess the administrative, technical, and financial capabilities of first responders. The customized data collection guide discussed under Task 2 will be used to gather updated capability information from participating jurisdictions and agencies. By collecting information about existing programs, policies, regulations and emergency plans, Wood can assess those activities and measures already in place that contribute towards mitigating some of the vulnerabilities identified. Once updated, the Capability Assessment is compared to the Risk Assessment to “paint a picture” of the potential disaster impacts. The information obtained during this process details the “net vulnerability” of the area (i.e., vulnerability tempered by existing capabilities), and it provides a platform for developing mitigation goals. In addition, this information provides a baseline of what these likely impacts would cost, thus providing an estimate of the benefits of any resulting mitigation actions. This provides added value to the LHMP by ensuring integration of the plan with existing policies, procedures, and other plans and assists in the identification of additional mitigation strategies. • Prepare and distribute Data Collection Guide to HMPC • Draft Capability Assessment The first sub-task of the Risk Assessment and Natural Hazards Assessment is the Hazard Identification, which involves identifying and profiling hazard events that present a threat to both the incorporated and unincorporated parts of the County. The planning effort will identify natural hazards and prioritize them by significance. As part of the plan development process, the HMPC will then review the list of hazards during HMPC Meeting #2. Hazards evaluated will include, but not be limited to: • Adverse weather – including drought and extreme weather events • Agricultural pests and plant diseases • Biological agents • Coastal erosion • Coastal flooding and inundation • Earthquakes – including fault rupture and groundshaking • Flooding • Debris Flows • Hazardous Trees • Liquefaction • Radon Hazards • Sea Level R...
View Source

Related to Capability Assessment

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.