Capacity and Scalability Clause Samples

Capacity and Scalability. This test is to assess the capacity and scalability of Flix, a vital component of an asset store.
View Source
Capacity and Scalability. ‌ SEN backbone systems for last mile connections shall support LACP link aggregation for incremental capacities. Last mile connection capacity shall be based upon the anticipated number of end users supported at each SEN participant location. SEN capacity calculation shall be based upon 10 Mbps per end user. Table 4 – Example Last-Mile Connection Capacity Calculations Example Calculations End Users Baseline Network Capacity (Gbps) (assumes 10 Mbps per end user) Last-mile Capacity Requirement (Gbps) (oversubscribed @ 10:1) Example 1 256 2.50 0.25 Example 2 1024 10.0 1.00 Example 3 2048 20.0 2.00 Network capacity oversubscription on last mile connections may be used but should not exceed a 10:1 ratio. It is recommended that last mile connections can support a QoS policy with which it is compatible, i.e., it can be mapped to QoS policy on the SEN backbone.
View Source
Capacity and Scalability. The system must have the capability of adding additional EV charging stations as deemed necessary by the District.
View Source

Related to Capacity and Scalability

  • Experience, Financial Capability and Suitability Subscriber is: (i) sophisticated in financial matters and is able to evaluate the risks and benefits of the investment in the Shares and (ii) able to bear the economic risk of its investment in the Shares for an indefinite period of time because the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act (as defined below) and therefore cannot be sold unless subsequently registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from such registration is available. Subscriber is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of its investment in the Company and has the capacity to protect its own interests. Subscriber must bear the economic risk of this investment until the Shares are sold pursuant to: (i) an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or (ii) an exemption from registration available with respect to such sale. Subscriber is able to bear the economic risks of an investment in the Shares and to afford a complete loss of Subscriber’s investment in the Shares.

  • Start-Up and Synchronization Consistent with the mutually acceptable procedures of the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner, the Developer is responsible for the proper synchronization of the Large Generating Facility to the New York State Transmission System in accordance with NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner procedures and requirements.

  • Power Quality Neither the facilities of Developer nor the facilities of Connecting Transmission Owner shall cause excessive voltage flicker nor introduce excessive distortion to the sinusoidal voltage or current waves as defined by ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, in accordance with IEEE Standard 519, or any applicable superseding electric industry standard. In the event of a conflict between ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, or any applicable superseding electric industry standard, ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, or the applicable superseding electric industry standard, shall control.

  • Compatibility 1. Any unresolved issue arising from a mutual agreement procedure case otherwise within the scope of the arbitration process provided for in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall not be submitted to arbitration if the issue falls within the scope of a case with respect to which an arbitration panel or similar body has previously been set up in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral convention that provides for mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved issues arising from a mutual agreement procedure case. 2. Nothing in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall affect the fulfilment of wider obligations with respect to the arbitration of unresolved issues arising in the context of a mutual agreement procedure resulting from other conventions to which the Contracting States are or will become parties.”.

  • Year 2000 Compatibility Take all actions necessary to assure the Borrower's computer based systems are able to operate and effectively process data on and after January 1, 2000. At the request of the Lender, the Borrower shall provide the Lender with assurance acceptable to the Lender that Borrower's computer systems have Year 2000 compatibility.