Case Description Sample Clauses
The 'Case Description' clause serves to provide a clear and detailed summary of the facts, background, and context relevant to a particular legal matter or dispute. Typically, this clause outlines the key events, parties involved, and the circumstances leading up to the case, ensuring that all stakeholders have a shared understanding of the situation. By establishing a factual foundation, the clause helps prevent misunderstandings and sets the stage for the application of other contractual or legal provisions, ultimately ensuring clarity and consistency throughout the document.
Case Description. ▇▇▇▇ was a 7-year-old boy with a diagnosis of AS who was referred to a tertiary Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAHMS) Neurodevelopmental Team for support around anxiety. ▇▇▇▇’s parents worked in education and ▇▇▇▇ had two brothers aged 9 and 5.
Case Description year-old male with a past medical history of incomplete quadriplegia secondary to a C8-T1 spinal cord injury (SCI) presented to the ED with two separate concerns. Firstly, he had a prolapsed stoma (colostomy) which General Surgery reduced without issue. Secondly, while bathing he noted that there was significant swelling and hardness of the left testicle. He has no sensation at this level. He experienced a prior episode of left EO, 5 years ago, which was treated and resolved without complication. Systemically he was well, with no fever, chills or vomiting. He appeared alert and oriented. His ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ were within normal limits. He has a neurogenic bladder managed with an indwelling urethral catheter, which was ordered to be changed every 4 weeks; however, the current one was changed 7-weeks prior. Examination of his scrotum revealed an enlarged, firm left hemiscrotum. The scrotal skin was not erythematous. No evidence of skin breakdown along with the scrotum or perineum, no crepitus or fluctuance. The clinical diagnosis was a possible EO. A scrotal ultrasound was requested for confirmation. Empiric therapy of intravenous (IV) antibiotics was implemented. The ▇▇▇▇▇ catheter was exchanged without issue and the scrotal ultrasound was performed. The sonogram was performed with a Philips IU22, using a high-resolution linear probe, 12-5 MHz. The sonogram revealed on the right side a focal area of enlargement of the epididymal tail with associated hyperemia. As well as an unremarkable right testicle with normal colour flow and spectral analysis (Figure 1).
Case Description. A pending action is covered by the settlement memorialized in this Agreement: a putative class action filed on June 15, 2011, in the Marin County Superior Court, Case Number CIV 1102982, entitled ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Arcadia Health Services, Inc. and removed by Defendant to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case Number CV-11-3552 EDL (the “Lawsuit”). That pleading asserted claims for non-payment of minimum wage in alleged violation of California Labor Code section 1194; failure to provide rest and meal periods in alleged violation of California Labor Code sections 226.7 and 512; failure to timely pay wages in alleged violation of California Labor Code sections 201, 202, and 203; and alleged unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code section 17200 et. seq. Counsel for the parties have engaged in extensive exchanges of information and held numerous meetings and discussions in an effort to arrive at settlement. As part of that discussion, the parties hereby agree to stipulate to the filing of a First Amended Complaint, which will include as additional claims for relief alleged damages under California Labor Code section 226 and alleged civil penalties under California Labor Code section 2699.
Case Description