Child Support Orders Clause Samples

Child Support Orders. Consultant expressly agrees, as part of its obligations under this Contract, to comply with the terms of the Child Support Assignment Orders Ordinance as set forth in Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 10.10, et seq., Ordinance No. 172,401, including any future amendments thereto.

Child Support Orders. This Agreement is subject to Section 10.10, Article I, Chapter 1, Division 10 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code related to Child Support Assignment Orders, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Pursuant to this Section, Concessionaire (and any sub-concessionaire of Concessionaire providing services to City under this Agreement) shall (1) fully comply with all State and Federal employment reporting requirements for Concessionaire's or Concessionaire's sub-concessionaire's employees applicable to Child Support Assignment Orders; (2) certify that the principal owner(s) of Concessionaire and applicable sub-concessionaires are in compliance with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally; (3) fully comply with all lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment in accordance with California Family Code Section 5230, et seq.; and (4) maintain such compliance K:RT/CDG/Concessions/Food&Beverage/Areas/T7-LAX-F&B 2017-02-27-Contract-T7-LAX-F&B-v3 throughout the term of this Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.10(b) of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, failure of Concessionaire or an applicable sub-concessionaire to comply with all applicable reporting requirements or to implement lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment or the failure of any principal owner(s) of Concessionaire or applicable sub-concessionaires to comply with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally shall constitute a default of this Contract subjecting this Agreement to termination where such failure shall continue for more than ninety (90) days after notice of such failure to Concessionaire by City (in lieu of any time for cure provided elsewhere in this Agreement).

Child Support Orders. 20.1. This Contract is subject to §10.10, Article I, Chapter 1, Division 10 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, related to Child Support Assignment Orders, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Pursuant to this section, Contractor (and any subcontractor of Contractor providing services to City under this Contract) shall (1) fully comply with all State and Federal employment reporting requirements for Contractor's, or Contractor's subcontractor's, employees applicable to Child Support Assignments Orders; (2) certify that the principal owner(s) of Contractor and applicable subcontractors are in compliance with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally; (3) fully comply with all lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment in accordance with California Family Code §5230, et seq.; and (4) maintain such compliance throughout the term of this Contract. 20.2. Pursuant to §10.10(b) of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, failure of Contractor, or an applicable subcontractor, to comply with all applicable reporting requirements, or to implement lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment, or the failure of any principal owner(s) of Contractor or applicable subcontractors to comply with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally, shall constitute a default of this Contract, thereby subjecting this Contract to termination, where such failure(s) shall continue for more than ninety (90) days after notice of such failure(s) to Contractor by City (in lieu of any time for cure provided elsewhere in this Contract).

Child Support Orders. This Agreement is subject to Section

Child Support Orders. This Contract is subject to Los Angeles Administrative Code, Division 10, Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 10.10, et seq. related to Child Support Assignment Orders, which is incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of Section

Child Support Orders. 12.1 This Contract is subject to §10.10, of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, related to Child Support Assignment Orders, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Pursuant to this section, Contractor (and any subcontractor of Contractor providing services to City under this Contract) shall (1) fully comply with all State and Federal employment reporting requirements for Contractor's, or Contractor's subcontractor's, employees applicable to Child Support Assignments Orders; (2) certify that the principal owner(s) of Contractor and applicable subcontractors are in compliance with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally; (3) fully comply with all lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment in accordance with California Family Code §5230, et seq.; and (4) maintain such compliance throughout the term of this Contract. 12.2 Pursuant to §10.10(b) of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, failure of Contractor, or an applicable subcontractor, to comply with all applicable reporting requirements, or to implement lawfully served Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment, or the failure of any principal owner(s) of Contractor or applicable subcontractors to comply with any Wage and Earnings Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignment applicable to them personally, shall constitute a default of this Contract, thereby subjecting this Contract to termination, where such failure(s) shall continue for more than ninety (90) days after notice of such failure(s) to Contractor by City (in lieu of any time for cure provided elsewhere in this Contract).

Child Support Orders. Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for child support orders from fathers to mothers, fathers to government (“the state”), and mothers to government in the month prior to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ care placement and during placement. In the month prior to having a child placed in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ care, 43.5% of mothers had an order in place for the father to pay them child support and a small fraction had an order in place for the father (3.8%) or them (2.1%) to pay child support to the state government for ▇▇▇▇▇▇ care cost-recovery, presumably from a spell prior to July 2004. During at least one month of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ care episode, 52.1% of mothers had father-to- mother orders, 41.1% had father-to-government orders, and 27.1% had mother-to-government orders in place and, in the month prior to the child exiting care, these figures were 28.9%, 27.8%, and 18.1%. Among mothers with such orders, the order was in place on average for 60.6%, 70.0%, and 60.3% of the months during which children were in care. Orders from fathers to mothers tended to be larger than those from fathers or mothers to government, both prior to and during the placement episode. For example, among those with orders in place, mean orders from fathers to mothers, fathers to government, and mothers to government were $517, $272, and

Child Support Orders. The simulations illustrate the potential impact of different policy options, and incorporate a number of simplifying assumptions:  We assume noncustodial fathers pay, and custodial mothers receive, all child support ordered. To the extent that low-income noncustodial fathers are more likely to comply with lower child support orders (▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, & ▇▇, 2008; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, & ▇▇▇▇▇, 2019; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2011), actual payments and receipts may decline less than orders when an SSR is applied. However, our simulations assume full compliance at all levels of support.  We account for multiple partners, and in doing so assume that couples, and orders, are sequenced in the order of the birth of the oldest child in each sibship. This sequencing is relevant given Wisconsin child support policy for serial payers, which considers each subsequent order based on the income available after paying prior orders.  We set orders based on father’s earnings in 2015 (the year prior to the order), and calculate income poverty based on the resulting order (under each scenario) and 2016 earnings.5 Simulated child support orders for our full sample are shown in the first panel of Table 2. The four columns show orders based on (1) current Wisconsin guidelines without the low-income adjustment, (2) with the low-income adjustment, (3) with an SSR with a catch-up provision (up to 60 percent of income above the SSR dedicated to child support), and (4) an SSR with the child 5Consequently, noncustodial parents with substantial changes in earnings between 2015 and 2016 will have orders that are higher (if their earnings fell), or lower (if their earnings rose) than would be called for based on their 2016 earnings. This reflects how the child support system typically works, in which orders often do not change when income does (Ha, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, & ▇▇▇▇▇, 2010). Table 2: Simulated child support orders Wisconsin guidelines, no adjustment Low-income adjustment Self-support reserve #1: 60% of income above FPL up to standard guideline amount Self-support reserve #2: 17% of income above FPL Percentage owing $0 7.7% 7.7% 26.7% 26.7% Mean order $671 $662 $639 $485 Distribution of orders 25th percentile $187 $143 $0 $0 Median 508 504 497 301 75th percentile ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ 671 Percentage owing $0 9.3% 9.3% 35.0% 35.0% Mean order $452 $441 $413 $287 Distribution of orders 25th percentile $107 $71 $0 $0 Median 359 349 329 154 75th percentile 645 642 638 437 Percentage owing $0 6.1% 6.1% 18.1% 18.1% Mean order $896...

Child Support Orders. This License is subject to Section 10.10, Article I, Chapter 1, Division 10 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code related to Child Support Assignment Orders, which is incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of Section 10.10 has been attached hereto for the convenience of the parties on Exhibit