Competitive Conditions Sample Clauses

The Competitive Conditions clause defines the standards and requirements that parties must adhere to in order to maintain fair competition within the scope of the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines acceptable business practices, restricts anti-competitive behavior such as price-fixing or collusion, and may require parties to comply with relevant competition laws. By setting these boundaries, the clause helps prevent unfair advantages and ensures that all parties operate on a level playing field, thereby protecting the integrity of the market and reducing the risk of legal disputes related to anti-competitive conduct.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Competitive Conditions. The parties listed below agree that this Addendum for Private Sector Work is provided for the purpose of giving the signatory contractor the opportunity to be competitive in negotiating and bidding projects in the private sector limited to the scope listed in paragraph 3 below.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Competitive Conditions. In our service areas, we have no direct competition from other natural gas distributors, but we compete with other forms of energy in each customer class. This competition among energy suppliers is based on price, efficiency, reliability, performance, preference, market conditions, technology, federal, state, and local energy policy, and environmental impacts. For residential and small to mid-size commercial customers, we compete primarily with providers of electricity, fuel oil, and propane. In the industrial and large commercial markets, we compete with all forms of energy, including competition from wholesale natural gas marketers. In addition, large industrial customers could bypass our local gas distribution system by installing their own direct pipeline connection to the interstate pipeline system. We have designed custom transportation service agreements with several of our largest industrial customers to provide transportation service rates that are competitive with the customer’s costs of installing their own pipeline; these agreements generally prohibit bypass. Due to the cost pressures confronting a number of our largest customers competing in global markets, bypass continues to be a competitive threat. Although we do not expect a significant number of our large customers to bypass our system in the foreseeable future, we could experience deterioration of utility margin if customers bypass or switch over to custom contracts with lower profit margins.
View Source
Competitive Conditions. The parties listed below agree that this Memorandum of Understanding for Private Sector Work is provided for the purpose of giving the signatory contractor the opportunity to be competitive in negotiating and bidding in the private sector limited to the scope listed in paragraph 3 below.
View SourceView Similar (27)
Competitive Conditions. User understands that Aciety System promotes trust between its Users and that Aciety encourages simplified information and human resource exchange for the purposes of sub-contracting. In the event a User employs an Employee from its Sub-contractor within two years such Employee was involved in fulfilling an associated Work Agreement, such User is regarded as dishonoring trust practices of Aciety System. As such action demotes the trust between Aciety and its users, User is obligated to compensate Sub-contractor by 10,000 EUR (ten thousand Euro) and Aciety by 2,500 EUR (two thousand five hundred Euro) for each such action.
View Source
Competitive Conditions. The principal factors for competition in vehicle management services are service quality and price. We are competitively positioned as a fully integrated provider of fleet management services with a broad range of product offerings. We rank second in the United States in the number of vehicles under management and first in the number of proprietary fuel and maintenance cards for fleet use in circulation. There are four other major providers of fleet management services in the United States, hundreds of local and regional competitors, and numerous niche competitors who focus on only one or two products and do not offer the fully integrated range of products provided by us. In the United States, it is estimated that only 45% of fleets are leased by third-party providers. The unpenetrated market and the continued focus by corporations on cost efficiency and outsourcing will provide the growth platform in the future.
View Source

Related to Competitive Conditions

  • Unsafe Conditions In accordance with 29 CFR § 1977, occasions might arise when an employee is confronted with a choice between not performing assigned tasks or subjecting himself/herself to serious injury or death arising from a hazardous condition at the workplace. If the employee, with no reasonable alternative, refuses in good faith to expose himself/herself to the dangerous condition, he/she would be protected against subsequent discrimination. The condition causing the employee's apprehension of death or injury must be of such a nature that a reasonable person, under the circumstances then confronting the employee, would conclude that there is a real danger of death or serious injury and that there is insufficient time, due to the urgency of the situation, to eliminate the danger by resorting to regular statutory enforcement channels. In addition, in such circumstances, the employee, where possible, must also have sought from his Employer, and been unable to obtain, a correction of the dangerous condition.

  • TEACHING CONDITIONS The parties recognize that optimum school facilities for both student and teacher are desirable to insure the high quality of education that is the goal of both the Association and the Board. It is also acknowledged that the primary duty and responsibility of the teacher is to teach and that the organization of the school and school day should be directed toward ensuring that the energy of the teacher is primarily utilized to this end.

  • SUSPENSIVE CONDITION i) The contract only becomes binding and enforceable once: a. the Parties have signed this contract and the PRODUCER has received a MEATCO confirmation letter stipulating the applicable ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ period and cattle quantity to be delivered to MEATCO; b. MEATCO agrees to provide a ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ allocation to the PRODUCER on a first come first served basis principle, and at the sole discretion of MEATCO; and c. the PRODUCER has provided, within 10 business days of MEATCO’s request, a guarantee or security for the payment of the maximum penalty capable of being imposed in terms of clause A. vi) above to the satisfaction of MEATCO.