Competitive Evaluation Sample Clauses

The Competitive Evaluation clause establishes a process for comparing proposals, products, or services from multiple vendors or parties to determine the most suitable option. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria and procedures for evaluating submissions, such as technical merit, pricing, and compliance with requirements, and may allow the evaluating party to request additional information or demonstrations. Its core function is to ensure a fair and transparent selection process, helping the contracting party make informed decisions and fostering competition among potential suppliers.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Competitive Evaluation. If, at any time beginning with the thirteenth (13th) Monthly Period following the Services Effective Date, Customer receives a bona fide offer from a telecommunications company to provide a package of telecommunications services that is substantially similar to the range of MCI WorldCom services offered under this Agreement, including, without limitation, revenue commitments, term, volume, product mix, functionality, features, credits offered, level of service and geographic breadth (a “Competitive Offer”), and such Competitive Offer would result in an overall cost savings to Customer of greater than *** (***%) over the then remaining term of this Agreement when compared to the effective rates charged by MCI WorldCom hereunder, then MCI WorldCom agrees to either match the Competitive Offer or to release Customer from this Agreement. Customer shall have the right to invoke this provision only once per year (starting with the thirteenth (13th) Monthly Period following the Services Effective Date) during the term of this Agreement. If MCI WorldCom does not elect to match the Competitive Offer within sixty (60) days after it is presented to MCI WorldCom by Customer in writing (with sufficient documentation of the Competitive Offer), (1) Customer shall be released from its obligations under this Agreement and this Agreement shall be deemed terminated as of the date which is ninety (90) days after (A) the conclusion of the sixty (60) day period specified above, or (B) the date on which MCI WorldCom notifies Customer that it will not match the Competitive Offer, whichever is earlier, and (2) Customer shall not be responsible for the early termination charges set forth in Section 7(b)-(c) of this Schedule 1, but Customer will be required, under Section 10.1 of this Schedule 1, to *** applicable to any circuits that were installed less than twelve (12) months prior to the date of such termination.
View Source
Competitive Evaluation. Unless specifically authorized by 3D Systems in writing, if Licensee is a competitor to 3D Systems’ business, it may not use the Software for competitive evaluation.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Competitive Evaluation. A competitive evaluation is performed by cross-functional teams, including Solectron stakeholders. The approach is collaborative with IBM and Solectron stakeholders to pre-define scoring criteria and weighting and may include factors other than price (i.e. delivery performance, technical advantages, etc).
View Source

Related to Competitive Evaluation

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Comprehensive Evaluation The Comprehensive evaluation is a growth-oriented, teacher/evaluator collaborative process that requires teachers to be evaluated on the eight (8) state criteria. A teacher must complete a Comprehensive evaluation once every six (6) years. Subsequent years they will be evaluated on a Focused evaluation, unless they have received a Basic or Unsatisfactory rating on their final comprehensive summative evaluation. Then they shall continue using the Comprehensive evaluation for the following year. All teachers during their provisional status must be on the Comprehensive evaluation.