Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs Clause Samples

The Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs clause establishes a structured approach to identifying and addressing the reliability requirements of a system or service. It typically involves regular assessments, stakeholder consultations, and the development of action plans to ensure that reliability standards are met. For example, this process may require periodic reviews of system performance data and the implementation of upgrades or maintenance schedules to prevent outages. The core function of this clause is to proactively manage and mitigate risks to reliability, ensuring consistent and dependable operation while minimizing the likelihood of service disruptions.
Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs. ‌ a. Notwithstanding any provision, including Section 3.08(e) contained in this Agreement, the NTO acknowledges its obligations described in the ISO’s Reliability Planning Process set forth in Attachment Y of the ISO OATT and in the Generator Deactivation Process set forth in Attachment FF of the ISO OATT, that arise when the ISO designates the NTO as a “Responsible Transmission Owner,” pursuant to Section 31.2.4.3 of the ISO OATT or Attachment FF of the ISO OATT, to address a reliability need(s) related to the transmission facilities that the NTO owns and that are subject to this Agreement. b. The NTO’s obligations described in Section 2.13(a) above shall be subject to the full recovery in wholesale rates on a current basis by the NTO, in accordance with the rate mechanism set forth in Section 6.10 of the ISO OATT (Rate Schedule 10) or Section 6.16 of the ISO OATT (Rate Schedule 16), of all reasonably incurred costs, including a reasonable return on investment and any applicable regulatory incentives, related to the preparation of a proposal for, and the development, construction, operation, and maintenance of, regulated transmission projects undertaken, or caused to be undertaken, by the NTO to meet a reliability need identified in the ISO’s Reliability Planning Process or Generator Deactivation Process as a result of being designated as the Responsible Transmission Owner, including those regulated transmission projects that were subsequently determined by the ISO not to be necessary to meet a reliability need or that cannot be completed because of the failure to obtain necessary federal, state, or local authorizations or for any other circumstance beyond the NTO’s reasonable control; c. The NTO’s obligations described in Section 2.13(a) above shall be further conditioned on: 1. The recovery of transmission-related costs in rates, as provided for in Section 2.13(b) above, will include, but not be limited to, all reasonable costs related to (i) obtaining or attempting to obtain all federal, state and local authorizations necessary for completion of the project included in the Comprehensive Reliability Plan and (ii) acquiring or attempting to acquire all necessary real property rights for such project; 2. The receipt by the NTO of all federal, state, and local authorizations necessary for completion of the regulated transmission project and acquisition by the NTO of all necessary property rights; and 3. The right of the NTO to request any incentives availa...
View SourceView Similar (75)
Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs. Notwithstanding any provision, including Section 3.08(e) contained in this Agreement, the NTO acknowledges its obligations described in the ISO’s Reliability Planning Process set forth in Attachment Y of the ISO OATT and in the Generator Deactivation Process set forth in Attachment FF of the ISO OATT, that arise when the ISO designates the NTO as a “Responsible Transmission Owner,” pursuant to Section 31.2.4.3 of the ISO OATT or Attachment FF of the ISO OATT, to address a reliability need(s) related to the transmission facilities that the NTO owns and that are subject to this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs a. Notwithstanding any provision, including Section 3.08(e), contained in this Reliability Planning Process set forth in Attachment Y of the ISO OATT, including those that arise when the ISO designates the NTO as a “Responsible Transmission Owner,” pursuant to Section 31.2.4.3 of the ISO OATT, to address a reliability need(s) related to the transmission facilities that that NTO owns. b. The NTO’s obligations described in Section 2.13(a) above shall be subject to the full recovery in wholesale rates on a current basis by the NTO, in accordance with the rate mechanism set forth in Section 6.10 of the ISO OATT (Rate Schedule 10), of all reasonably incurred costs related to the preparation of a proposal for, and the development, construction, operation, and maintenance of, regulated transmission projects undertaken, or caused to be undertaken, by the NTO, including those regulated transmission projects that were subsequently determined by the ISO not to be necessary to meet a reliability need or that cannot be completed because of the failure to obtain necessary federal, state, or local authorizations or for any other circumstance beyond the NTO’s reasonable control; c. The NTO’s obligations described in Section 2.13(a) above shall be further authorizations necessary for completion of the regulated transmission project and acquisition by the NTO of all necessary property rights. d. Nothing contained in Section 2.13 of this Agreement shall limit the right of the NTO to protest, comment on, or engage in litigation before FERC, the New York Public Service Commission, or any court with respect to proposed changes to the Reliability Planning Process.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ISO
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Comprehensive Planning Process for Reliability Needs

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/508.htm.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Information Technology Enterprise Architecture Requirements If this Contract involves information technology-related products or services, the Contractor agrees that all such products or services are compatible with any of the technology standards found at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/iot/2394.htm that are applicable, including the assistive technology standard. The State may terminate this Contract for default if the terms of this paragraph are breached.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.