CONCLUDING CONDITIONS. 26.1 All correspondence and the final report have to be written in English. 26.2 The Selected Third Parties’ consistent level in their respective field of expertise played a key role for the selection of their Experiment. It entails any total or partial transfer of provisions and the rights and duties in the prior formal approval of all signatories. 26.3 TETRAMAX intends to employ a dedicated Technical Coach (TC) and a dedicated Business Coach (BC) for each Experiment. In order to maximize the Experiment impact, the TC provides occasional technical review and advice to the Selected Third Parties, while the BC provides support and consultancy from a business perspective. The Selected Third Parties declare their willingness to cooperate with their respective TC and BC during the Experiment execution. The TETRAMAX Steering Committee will assign both the TC and the BC in mutual agreement with the Selected Third Parties. 26.4 The Selected Third Parties must take all measures to prevent any situation where the impartial and objective implementation of the action is compromised for reasons involving economic interest, political or national affinity, family or emotional ties or any other shared interest (‘conflict of interests’). They must formally notify without delay any situation to TETRAMAX constituting or likely to lead to a conflict of interests and immediately take all the necessary steps to rectify this situation. 26.5 During the implementation of the Experiment and for four years after the end of TETRAMAX, the Selected Third Parties must keep confidential any data, documents or other material (in any form) that is identified as confidential at the time it is disclosed. 26.6 The Selected Third Parties' responsibilities with respect to ownership and protection of results, exploitation and open access rights are listed in the Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 and Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013. 26.7 If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal or in conflict with the applicable law, the validity of the remaining provisions shall not be affected. The ineffective provision shall be replaced by an effective provision which is economically equivalent. The same shall apply in case of a gap. 26.8 This Agreement has to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Germany. 26.9 Any disagreement or dispute which may arise in connection with this Agreement and which the Selected Third Parties are unable to settle by mutual agreement will be brought before the courts of Aachen, Germany.
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Grant Agreement, Grant Agreement, Grant Agreement