Consideration for Reappointment. 1. Pre-Six Unit 18 faculty with a current Unit 18 Faculty appointment who submit interest as described in this section (“internal candidates”) will be considered for reappointment prior to the consideration of external Unit 18 applicants. A request for reappointment consideration shall be submitted by Pre-Six Unit 18 Faculty to the department chair, department chair equivalent, or designee in accordance with the deadlines in the chart below, or within thirty (30) calendar days from the date on which the appointment letter is transmitted to the Unit 18 faculty member, whichever is later. Initial Appointment Multi-year Appointment final year 9/12 Appointees October 15 October 15 1/9 quarter – Fall October 15 October 15 1/10 semester – Fall October 15 October 15 1/9 quarter – Winter February 1 October 15 1/10 semester – Spring only February 1 October 15 1/9 quarter – Spring only May 1 October 15 2. A request for reappointment consideration shall include the following: a. An affirmative statement of interest for reappointment and curriculum vitae; b. A list of courses and/or other assigned duties that the Unit 18 faculty member is interested in; c. For each quarter of a possible reappointment, the appointment percentage that the Unit 18 faculty member would like to receive. 3. Reappointment from the initial appointment to a two-year appointment is based on an assessment made by the department chair/equivalent. The assessment shall include all materials submitted pursuant to KJ.2.1. and other material available to the department chair or equivalent. The assessment shall be made on the basis of demonstrated competence in the field, ability in teaching ability, academic responsibility, and other assigned duties, which that may include University co-curricular and community service. The University shall provide written feedback. 4. A department, program, or unit is not precluded from offering courses, other duties, or an appointment percentage that are different or in addition to those requested by the Unit 18 faculty member. 5. If a Unit 18 faculty member fails to timely submit interest for reappointment or submits a written declaration of non-interest for the following academic year, the department, program, or unit shall not be obligated to conduct a Pre-Six Academic Review or consider them for subsequent appointments.
Appears in 1 contract
Consideration for Reappointment. 1. Pre-Six Unit 18 faculty with a current Unit 18 Faculty appointment who submit interest as described in this section (“internal candidates”) will be considered for reappointment prior to the consideration of external Unit 18 applicants. A request for reappointment consideration shall be submitted by Prepre-Six six Unit 18 Faculty faculty to the department chair, department chair equivalent, or designee in accordance with the deadlines in the chart below, or within thirty (30) calendar days from the date on which the appointment letter is transmitted to the Unit 18 faculty member, whichever is later. Initial Appointment Multi-year Appointment final year 9/12 Appointees October 15 October 15 1/9 quarter – Fall October 15 October 15 1/10 semester – Fall October 15 October 15 1/9 quarter – Winter February 1 October 15 1/10 semester – Spring only February 1 October 15 1/9 quarter – Spring only May 1 October 15
2. A request for reappointment consideration shall include the following:
a. An affirmative statement of interest for reappointment and curriculum vitae;
b. A list of courses and/or other assigned duties that the Unit 18 faculty member is interested in;
c. For each quarter of a possible reappointment, the appointment percentage that the Unit 18 faculty member would like to receive.
3. Reappointment from the initial appointment to a two-year appointment is based on an assessment made by the department chair/equivalent. The assessment shall include all materials submitted pursuant to KJ.2.1J.2. and other material available to the department chair or equivalent. The assessment shall be made on the basis of demonstrated competence in the field, ability in teaching ability, academic responsibility, and other assigned duties, which that may include University co-curricular and community service. The University shall provide written feedback.
4. A department, program, or unit is not precluded from offering courses, other duties, or an appointment percentage that are different or in addition to those requested by the Unit 18 faculty member.
5. If a Unit 18 faculty member fails to timely submit interest for reappointment or submits a written declaration of non-interest for the following academic year, the department, program, or unit shall not be obligated to conduct a Pre-Six Academic Review or consider them for subsequent appointments.
6. Section J.6. only applies to Unit 18 faculty who have undergone a Pre-Six Academic Review in the same department, program, or unit. In the event that department, program, or unit determines that a Unit 18 faculty member deemed “effective” will not be reappointed at the same or increased appointment percentage as the previous appointment, the Unit 18 faculty member will be provided with a written explanation.
a. The decision not to reappoint an “effective” instructor shall not be arbitrary or capricious.
b. The decision not to reappoint or to reappoint at a lower overall appointment percentage shall be based on one or more of the following:
i. lack of work (unavailability of a course assignment for which the Unit 18 faculty is qualified, as determined by the University);
ii. programmatic need or change (consistent with this article) that results in a lack of work as defined in J.6.b.1). above;
iii. budgetary considerations (subject to Section K.5 that results in a lack of work as defined in J.6.b.1). above;
iv. assignment of course(s) to Senate Faculty that were previously taught by a pre-six Unit 18 faculty member that results in a lack of work as defined in J.6.b.1). above;
v. assignment of course(s) to a graduate academic student employee or postdoctoral scholar that were previously taught by a pre-six Unit 18 faculty member that results in a lack of work as defined in J.6.b.1). above;
vi. assignment of course(s) to a pre-six Unit 18 faculty member on a time-limited or programmatic basis under Section E - Special Considerations;
vii. the University determined at its sole discretion that another current Unit 18 faculty member is more qualified to teach the course(s) that results in a lack of work as defined in J.6.b.1). above.
7. The University is not precluded from offering future work to a Unit 18 faculty member who has been deemed effective but not reappointed for a reason in Section J.6.b.
Appears in 1 contract