Content Review Process Clause Samples

The Content Review Process clause establishes the procedures and standards for evaluating and approving content before it is published or distributed. Typically, this clause outlines the steps for submitting content for review, identifies who is responsible for reviewing and approving the material, and may set timelines for feedback or revisions. By formalizing how content is reviewed, the clause helps ensure that all published materials meet agreed-upon quality, legal, or branding requirements, thereby reducing the risk of errors, inappropriate content, or non-compliance with regulations.
Content Review Process. Upon approval of an Application, NASM/AFAA will review each CE Offering submitted by Approved Provider in order to allow NASM/AFAA to determine, in its sole judgment, if the proposed CE Offering is consistent with NASM/AFAA’s quality standards for continuing education content. • Approved Provider agrees that the nature and quality of the CE Offering shall be of the highest quality, provided free of defects and in full compliance with all laws and NASM/AFAA’s the quality standards. • These quality standards include, but are not limited to, the relevance of the content to health and fitness, the credibility of the content, whether the content is current and unique, whether it is at an appropriate level (designed for experienced fitness professionals), the credentials of the content developers and instructors, and whether it aligns with ▇▇▇▇’s and/or AFAA’s missions and reputations.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Content Review Process. Upon approval of an Application, ISSA will review each CE Offering submitted by Approved Preferred Provider to allow ISSA to determine, in its sole judgment, if the proposed CE Offering is consistent with ISSA’s quality standards for continuing education content. Approved Preferred Provider agrees that the nature and quality of the CE Offering shall be of the highest quality, provided free of defects and in full compliance with all laws and ISSA's quality standards. ● These quality standards include, but are not limited to, the relevance of the content to health and fitness, the credibility of the content, whether the content is current and unique, whether it is at an appropriate level (designed for experienced fitness professionals), the credentials of the content developers and instructors, and whether it aligns with ▇▇▇▇’s mission and reputation. ● ISSA will not award CEUs for certification programs in personal or fitness training, group fitness or any related field. As used herein, the term “certification” is defined to mean a credentialing process that implements an unbiased measure of an individual’s knowledge and competence in a given field and the term “continuing education” is defined to mean learning content intended to advance the skills and knowledge of an established professional or practitioner in a given field. ● An Approved Preferred Provider shall not use the term “certification” to describe or denote any continuing education content or in promotional materials concerning such continuing education content. ISSA will accept the use of terms such as “Certificate of Completion.”
View Source
Content Review Process. Upon approval of an Application, NASM/AFAA will review each CE Offering submitted by Approved Provider in order to allow NASM/AFAA to determine, in its sole judgment, if the proposed CE Offering is consistent with NASM/AFAA’s quality standards for continuing education content. Approved Provider agrees that the nature and quality of the CE Offering shall be of the highest quality, provided free of defects and in full compliance with all laws and NASM/AFAA’s the quality standards.  These quality standards include, but are not limited to, the relevance of the content to health and fitness, the credibility of the content, whether the content is current and unique, whether it is at an appropriate level (designed for experienced fitness professionals), the credentials of the content developers and instructors, and whether it aligns with NASM’s and/or AFAA’s missions and reputations.  NASM/AFAA will not award CEUs for certification programs in personal or fitness training, group fitness or any related field. As used herein, the term “certification” is defined to mean a credentialing process that implements an unbiased measure of an individual’s knowledge and competence in a given field and the term “continuing education” is defined to mean learning content intended to advance the skills and knowledge of an established professional or practitioner in a given field.  An Approved Provider shall not use the term “certification” to describe or denote any continuing education content or in promotional materials concerning such continuing education content. NASM/AFAA will accept the use of the following terms in conjunction with continuing education materials: “Certificate of Advanced Qualification”, “Specialty Certificate”, “Certificate of Achievement”, or “Certificate of Completion.”
View Source

Related to Content Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.