Continued Infringement Sample Clauses

The Continued Infringement clause allows a party to address situations where the other party persists in infringing intellectual property rights, even after being notified of the issue. Typically, this clause outlines the steps that must be taken if infringement continues, such as providing written notice and allowing a cure period, and may permit termination of the agreement if the infringement is not resolved. Its core function is to protect the non-infringing party from ongoing legal or financial risk by providing a clear mechanism to stop the relationship if intellectual property violations are not remedied.
Continued Infringement. 6.6.4.1 If Neose fails to either bring suit against or enter into negotiations for settlement with such Third Party within six (6) months after receipt of notice of such infringement and Novo is of the opinion that the alleged infringement or misappropriation of Neose Technology is occurring in the Field of Use then, upon Novo’s written request, the Parties shall seek the opinion of patent counsel acceptable to both Parties as to whether there has been or continues to be a misappropriation or infringement of the Neose Technology in the Field of Use by such Third Party. If such patent counsel concurs with Novo’s opinion, Novo shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring suit against such Third Party under the Neose Technology and to join Neose as a party plaintiff. Neose will cooperate with Novo in any such suit brought against a Third Party and shall have the right to consult with Novo and to participate in and be represented by counsel in such suit at its own expense. In the event that Novo recovers any sums in such suit by way of damages or in settlement thereof, such sums shall be used first to reimburse each of Novo and Neose for their documented, out-of-pocket legal expenses, with Novo retaining any remaining amounts. ****** — Material has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. 6.6.4.2 If Novo fails to either bring suit against or enter into negotiations for settlement with such Third Party within six (6) months after receipt of notice of such infringement and Neose is of the opinion that the alleged infringement or misappropriation of the relevant Neose License Claims is occurring with regard to a Neose Exclusive Compound then, upon Neose’s written request, the Parties shall seek the opinion of patent counsel acceptable to both Parties as to whether there has been or continues to be a misappropriation or infringement of the Neose License Claims that affects a Neose Exclusive Compound by such Third Party. If such patent counsel concurs with Neose’s opinion, Neose shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring suit against such Third Party under the Neose License Claims and to join Novo as a party plaintiff. Novo will cooperate with Neose in any such suit brought against a Third Party and shall have the right to consult with Neose and to participate in and be represented by counsel in such suit at its own expense. In the event that Neose recovers any sums in such suit by way of damages or in settlement thereof, such su...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Continued Infringement. If Neose fails to either bring suit against or enter into negotiations for settlement with such Third Party within six (6) months after receipt of notice of such infringement and Novo is of the opinion that the alleged infringement or misappropriation of Neose Technology is occurring in the Field of Use then, upon Novo’s written request, the Parties shall seek the opinion of patent counsel acceptable to both Parties as to whether there has been or continues to be a misappropriation or infringement of the Neose Technology in the Field of Use by such Third Party. If such patent counsel concurs with Novo’s opinion, Novo shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring suit against such Third Party under the Neose Technology and to join Neose as a party plaintiff. Neose will cooperate with Novo in any such suit brought against a Third Party and shall have the right to consult with Novo and to participate in and be represented by counsel in such suit at its own expense. In the event that Novo recovers any sums in such suit by way of damages or in settlement thereof, such sums shall be used first to reimburse each of Novo and Neose for their documented, out-of-pocket legal expenses, with Novo retaining any remaining amounts.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Continued Infringement

  • Claimed Infringement Each Party will promptly notify the other Party if a Third Party brings any Action alleging patent infringement by Lian or Landos or any of their respective Affiliates or Sublicensees with respect to the Development, Manufacture or Commercialization of any Licensed Product or Joint Patent Rights (any such Action, an “Infringement Claim”) in the Territory. Lian will have the right, but not the obligation, to control the defense and response to any such Infringement Claim in the Territory with respect to Lian’s activities, at Lian’s sole cost and expense, and Landos will have the right, at its own expense, to be represented in any such Infringement Claim in the Territory by counsel of its own choice. Landos will have the sole right, but not the obligation, to control the defense and response to any such Infringement Claim with respect to Landos’ activities, including any such Infringement Claim in the Territory or outside of the Territory. Upon the request of the Party controlling the response to the Infringement Claim, the other Party will reasonably cooperate with the controlling Party in the reasonable defense of such Infringement Claim. The other Party will have the right to consult with the controlling Party concerning any Infringement Claim and to participate in and be represented by independent counsel in any associated litigation. If the Infringement Claim is brought against both Parties, then each Party will have the right to defend against the Infringement Claim. The Party defending an Infringement Claim under this Section 7.4 (Claimed Infringement) will (a) consult with the other Party as to the strategy for the prosecution of such defense, (b) consider in good faith any comments from the other Party with respect thereto and (c) keep the other Party reasonably informed of any material steps taken and provide copies of all material documents filed, in connection with such defense. The Party controlling the defense against an Infringement Claim will have the right to settle such Infringement Claim on terms deemed reasonably appropriate by such Party, provided, that, neither Party will have the right to settle any Infringement Claim under this Section 7.4 (Claimed Infringement) in a manner that diminishes the rights or interests of the other Party under this Agreement without the consent of such other Party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.

  • Patent Infringement 18.1 If either party learns of infringement of potential commercial significance of any of the REGENTS' PATENT RIGHTS, it will provide the other with: (i) written notice of such infringement and (ii) any evidence of such infringement available to it (the "Infringement Notice"). Neither party will put an alleged infringer on notice of the existence of any of the REGENTS' PATENT RIGHTS without first obtaining consent of the other. Both the REGENTS and the LICENSEE will use their diligent efforts to terminate such infringement without litigation. 18.2 If the matter described in the Infringement Notice is not resolved within ninety (90) days of receipt of the Infringement Notice, then the LICENSEE may institute suit for patent infringement. The LICENSEE may not join the REGENTS as a party in such suit without the REGENTS' prior written consent. If the REGENTS joins such suit at the LICENSEE’s request or is involuntarily joined, the LICENSEE will pay all out-of-pocket costs incurred by the REGENTS arising out of such suit. 18.3 If, within a hundred and twenty (120) days of receipt of the Infringement Notice, the matter described in the Infringement Notice has not been resolved and the LICENSEE has not filed suit against the infringer, then the REGENTS may institute suit for patent infringement against the infringer. If the REGENTS institutes such suit, then the LICENSEE may not join such suit without the REGENTS' consent and may not thereafter commence suit against the infringer for the acts of infringement that are the subject of the REGENTS' suit or any judgment rendered in that suit. 18.4 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this AGREEMENT, in the event that either party receives written notice of infringement under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (and/or foreign counterparts of this Law) (“The Act”), then the party in receipt of such notice under the Act will promptly provide the Infringement Notice to the other party. If under the Act the LICENSEE will lose the right to pursue legal remedies for infringement by not filing suit, the notification period and the time period to file suit under Paragraph 18.2 will be accelerated to within forty-five (45) days from receipt of the Infringement Notice to either party. 18.5 Any recovery or settlement received in connection with any suit will first be shared by the REGENTS and the LICENSEE equally to cover any litigation costs each incurred and will next be paid to the REGENTS or the LICENSEE to cover any litigation costs it incurred in excess of the litigation costs of the other. In any suit initiated by the LICENSEE, any recovery in excess of litigation costs will be shared between LICENSEE and the REGENTS as follows: (a) for any recovery other than amounts paid for willful infringement: (i) the REGENTS will receive fifteen percent (15%) of the recovery if the REGENTS did not incur any litigation costs or all of the REGENTS’ litigation costs were reimbursed by LICENSEE, (ii) the REGENTS will receive thirty percent (30%) of the recovery if the REGENTS incurred any litigation costs in connection with the litigation that were not reimbursed by LICENSEE; and

  • Non-Infringement To the knowledge of the Company, there is no unauthorized use, unauthorized disclosure, infringement or misappropriation of any Company-Owned Intellectual Property by any third party. The Company has not brought any Legal Proceeding for infringement or misappropriation of any Company-Owned Intellectual Property. The Company has no Liability for infringement or misappropriation of any Third-Party Intellectual Property. The operation of the Business, including (i) the design, development, manufacturing, reproduction, marketing, licensing, sale, offer for sale, importation, distribution, provision and/or use of any Company Product and/or Company-Owned Intellectual Property and (ii) the Company’s use of any product, device, process or service used in the Business as previously conducted, currently conducted and as proposed to be conducted by the Company, has not, does not and will not infringe (directly or indirectly, including via contribution or inducement), misappropriate or violate any Third-Party Intellectual Property, breach any terms of service, click-through agreement or any other agreement or rules, policies or guidelines applicable to use of such Third-Party Intellectual Property, and does not constitute unfair competition or unfair trade practices under the Applicable Law of any jurisdiction in which the Company conducts its business or in which Company Products are manufactured, marketed, distributed, licensed or sold and there is no basis for any such claims. The Company has not been sued in any Legal Proceeding or received any written communications (including any third-party reports by users) alleging that the Company has infringed, misappropriated, or violated or, by conducting the Business, would infringe, misappropriate, or violate any Intellectual Property of any other Person or entity. No Company Intellectual Property or Company Product is subject to any Legal Proceeding, Order, settlement agreement or right that restricts in any manner the use, transfer or licensing thereof by the Company, or that may affect the validity, use or enforceability of any Company Intellectual Property. The Company has not received any opinion of counsel that any Company Product or Company-Owned Intellectual Property or the operation of the business of the Company, as previously or currently conducted, or as currently proposed to be conducted, infringes or misappropriates any Third-Party Intellectual Property Rights. The Company has not received any opinion of counsel that any Company Product or Company Owned Intellectual Property or the operation of the business of the Company, as previously or currently conducted, or as currently proposed to be conducted by the Company, infringes or misappropriates any Third Party Intellectual Property Rights.

  • Copyright Infringement Contractor shall also indemnify, defend and hold harmless all Indemnitees from all suits or claims for infringement of the patent rights, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, service ▇▇▇▇, or any other proprietary right of any person or persons in consequence of the use by the City, or any of its boards, commissions, officers, or employees of articles, work or deliverables supplied in the performance of Services. Infringement of patent rights, copyrights, or other proprietary rights in the performance of this Agreement, if not the basis for indemnification under the law, shall nevertheless be considered a material breach of contract.

  • Non-Infringement Warranty Seller warrants that all Goods and Services do not and shall not infringe any patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret or other intellectual property right of a third party.