Common use of Continued verification arrangements Clause in Contracts

Continued verification arrangements. 3.1. The authority which has granted UN type-approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility. 3.1.1. The normal arrangements shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements) of this Schedule. 3.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the Technical Services (qualified or recognised as required in paragraph 1.3.3) shall be accepted as satisfying the requirements of paragraph 3. 1.1 concerning the procedures established at the initial assessment. 3.1.1.2. The normal frequency of these verifications by the approval authority (other than those referred to in paragraph 3.1. 1.1) shall be such as to ensure that the relevant controls applied in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Schedule are reviewed at intervals based on a risk assessment methodology consistent with the international standard ISO 31000:2009 — Risk Management — Principles and guidelines and, in all cases, with a minimum frequency of once every three years. This methodology should take particular account of any non-conformity raised by Contracting Parties under Article 4 of the 1958 Agreement. 3.2. At every review, the records of tests and checks and production records shall be available to the inspector; in particular, records of those tests or checks documented as required in paragraph 2.2. 3.3. The inspector may select samples at random to be tested in the manufacturer's laboratory or in the facilities of the Technical Service. In such a case only physical tests shall be carried out. The minimum number of samples may be determined according to the results of the manufacturer's own verification. 3.4. Where the level of control appears unsatisfactory, or when it seems necessary to verify the validity of the tests carried out in application of paragraph 3.2, the inspector shall select samples to be sent to the Technical Service to perform physical tests. 3.5. Where unsatisfactory results are found during an inspection or a monitoring review, the approval authority shall ensure that all necessary steps are taken to restore conformity of production as rapidly as possible.

Continued verification arrangements. 3.1. The authority which has granted UN type-type approval may at any time verify the conformity control methods applied in each production facility. 3.1.1. The normal arrangements shall be to monitor the continued effectiveness of the procedures laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 (initial assessment and product conformity arrangements) of this Schedule. 3.1.1.1. Surveillance activities carried out by the Technical Services technical services (qualified or recognised recognized as required in paragraph 1.3.3paragraphs 1.3.1 and 1.3.2) shall be accepted as satisfying the requirements of paragraph 3. 1.1 3.1.1 concerning the procedures established at the initial assessment. 3.1.1.2. The normal frequency of these verifications by the approval authority (other than those referred to in paragraph 3.1. 1.13.1.1.1) shall be such as to ensure that the relevant controls applied in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Schedule are reviewed at intervals based on a risk assessment methodology consistent with the international standard ISO 31000:2009 — Risk Management — Principles and guidelines and, in all cases, with a minimum frequency of once every three years. This methodology should take particular account of any non-non- conformity raised by Contracting Parties under Article 4 of the 1958 Agreement. 3.2. At every review, the records of tests and checks and production records shall be available to the inspector; in particular, records of those tests or checks documented as required in paragraph 2.2. 3.3. The inspector may select samples at random to be tested in the manufacturer's laboratory or in the facilities of the Technical Servicetechnical service. In such a case only physical tests shall be carried out. The minimum number of samples may be determined according to the results of the manufacturer's own verification. 3.4. Where the level of control appears unsatisfactory, or when it seems necessary to verify the validity of the tests carried out in application of paragraph 3.23.3, the inspector shall select samples to be sent to the Technical Service technical service to perform physical tests. 3.5. Where unsatisfactory results are found during an inspection or a monitoring review, the approval authority shall ensure that all necessary steps are taken to restore conformity of production as rapidly as possible.