Common use of Continuous Review Clause in Contracts

Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other means. C.5.3.6. All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat for consideration at the next Meeting of the Accord signatories.

Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. C.5.3.1 The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. C.5.3.2 An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. C.5.3.3 Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. C.5.3.4 Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. C.5.3.5 The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other meansmeeting. C.5.3.6. C.5.3.6 All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. C.5.3.7 Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. C.5.3.8 If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat for consideration at the next General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories.

Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other meansmeeting. C.5.3.6. All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat for consideration at the next General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories.

Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. C.5.3.1 The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. C.5.3.2 An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. C.5.3.3 Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. C.5.3.4 Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. C.5.3.5 The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other meansmeeting. C.5.3.6. C.5.3.6 All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. C.5.3.7 Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. C.5.3.8 If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat for consideration at the next General or Mid-term Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.6 FULFILLMENT OF REPORTING OBLIGATIONS