Common use of Contract Dispute Resolution Board Clause in Contracts

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 Section as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established established, and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 60.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 60.6.2. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 60.6.3. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 51.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 51.6.1.1. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 51.6.2. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 27.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 27.6.2. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 27.6.3. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 60.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 60 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 60.6.2. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 60.6.3. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 Section 12.03 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established established, and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 60.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 60.6.1.1. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 60.6.2. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 51.6.1. The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 51 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 51.6.2. The CCPO or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 51.6.3. A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The (a) the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 section as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO (b) the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; participated , and 27.6.3 A (c) a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 Section 12.03 as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s CDRB's functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established established, and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 Section as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established established, and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-decision‐ makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 The 1. the chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/his or her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 Section as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 The CCPO 2. the City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/his or her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; and 27.6.3 A 3. a person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established established, and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers decision‐makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.

Contract Dispute Resolution Board. There shall be a Contract Dispute Resolution Board composed of: 27.6.1 (a) The chief administrative law judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (“OATH”) or his/her designated OATH administrative law judge, who shall act as chairperson, and may adopt operational procedures and issue such orders consistent with this Article 27 section as may be necessary in the execution of the Contract Dispute Resolution BoardCDRB’s functions, including, but not limited to, granting extensions of time to present or respond to submissions; 27.6.2 (b) The CCPO City Chief Procurement Officer (“CCPO”) or his/her designee; any designee shall have the requisite background to consider and resolve the merits of the dispute and shall not have participated personally and substantially in the particular matter that is the subject of the dispute or report to anyone who so participated; , and 27.6.3 (c) A person with appropriate expertise who is not an employee of the City. This person shall be selected by the presiding administrative law judge from a prequalified panel of individuals, established and administered by OATH OATH, with appropriate background to act as decision-makers in a dispute. Such individual individuals may not have a contract or dispute with the City or be an officer or employee of any company or organization that does, or regularly represents represent persons, companies, or organizations having disputes with the City.