Common use of Contract Enforcement Clause in Contracts

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. 7 A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. 7 A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1-2, 5-7. . A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.108(b)) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1-2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. 7 A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Travis County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO FOR A, B2, 5-7. 7 Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B.2), 5-7. B.5)-B.7) A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. B. Termination Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR B.2), B.5)- B.7) 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1‐2, 5-75‐7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by CustomerNon‐Appropriation

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO FOR A, B2, 5-7. 7 Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.108(b)) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,00025,000.00. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO FOR A, B2, 5-7. 7 A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1-2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDEREDResolution 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by CustomerDIR

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO FOR A, B2, 5-7. 5‐7 Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by CustomerNon‐Appropriation

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1‐2, 5-75‐7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Travis County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by CustomerNon‐Appropriation

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.108(b)) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. . A. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000.. 09/29/2017 Page 27 of 31 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO FOR A, B2, 5-7. 7 Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s 's failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s 's right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Customer, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.1115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by CustomerDIR

Contract Enforcement. Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO A, B2B1-2, 5-7. Enforcement of Contract and Dispute Resolution Note: NO EXCEPTIONS OR REVISIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED 1) Vendor and DIR agree to the following: (i) a party’s 's failure to require strict performance of any provision of the Contract shall not waive or diminish that party’s 's right thereafter to demand strict compliance with that or any other provision, (ii) for disputes not resolved in the normal course of business, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, shall be used, and (iii) actions or proceedings arising from the Contract shall be heard in a state court of competent jurisdiction in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Travis County, Texas. 2) Disputes arising between a Customer and the Vendor shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution process of the Customer that is not inconsistent with subparagraph A.1 above. DIR shall not be a party to any such dispute unless DIR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Vendor agree in writing. 3) State agencies are required by rule (34 TAC §20.111520.115) to report vendor performance through the Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) on every purchase over $25,000. 1) Termination for Non-Appropriation a) Termination for Non-Appropriation by Customer