Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency Clause Samples

The 'Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency' clause governs the process and requirements for entering into contracts with the chief executive officer or equivalent leader of a state agency. Typically, this clause outlines who has the authority to bind the agency to contractual obligations and may specify any additional approvals or disclosures needed when the executive head is a party to the contract. Its core function is to ensure transparency and proper authorization in high-level agreements, thereby preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring compliance with state procurement laws.
Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency. A. The Offeror represents and certifies that they are in compliance with Texas Government Code, Section 669.003, relating to contracting with the executive head of a State Agency. B. If Section 669.003 applies, the Offeror shall complete the following information in order for the proposal to be evaluated: Name of Former Executive: Name of State Agency: Date of Separation from State Agency: Date of Employment with Offeror:
View SourceView Similar (14)
Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency. Contractor certifies this contract is in compliance with Texas Government Code Section 669.003 relating to contracting with the executive head of a State agency. If Texas Government Code Section 669.003 applies, bidder will provide the following information in order for the bid to be evaluated: Name of Former Executive; Name of State Agency; Date of Separation from State Agency; Position with Bidder; and Date of Employment with Bidder.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency. Contractor certifies that Contractor is in compliance with TEX. GOV’T. CODE § 669.003, relating to employment of the executive head of a state agency. If Contractor currently or subsequently employs a current or former executive head of a state agency, Contractor will submit the following information to the Division Contract Management Unit assigned to the Contract: (a) name of Executive; (b) name of State Agency; (c) date of Separation from State Agency, if separated; (d) date of Employment with Contractor; and (e) other information as required by DSHS to verify Contractor’s compliance with TEX. GOV’T. CODE § 669.003.
View Source
Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency. Pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 669.003, Service Provider certifies that it is not the executive head of the TJJD, a person who at any time during the four years before the date of this contract was the executive head of the TJJD, or a person or business entity that employs a current or former executive head of a state agency affected by Section 669.003.
View Source
Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency. Contractor represents and certifies that they are in compliance or will do what is required to comply with Texas Government Code, Section 669.003 relating to contracting with the executive head of a state agency. See Exhibit A, Execution of Offer.
View Source

Related to Contracting with Executive Head of State Agency

  • PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH ENTITIES USING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT (Effective Aug. 13, 2020 Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.216, Contractor shall not offer equipment, services, or system that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. ‘‘Covered telecommunications equipment or services means 1) telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities); 2) for the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities);

  • Procurement from UN Agencies Goods estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent per contract may be procured directly from Inter-Agency Procurement Services Office (IAPSO) in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 and 3.9 of the Procurement Guidelines.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING BOYCOTTING CERTAIN ENERGY COMPANIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this contract has a value of $100,000 or more that is to be paid wholly or partly from public funds, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 13 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or any wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of these entities or business associations, if any, does not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract. For purposes of this contract, the term “company” shall mean an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, that exists to make a profit. The term “boycott energy company” shall mean “without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (a) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law, or (b) does business with a company described by paragraph (a).” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 809.001(1).

  • STATE MEAL MANDATE When CONTRACTOR is a nonpublic school, CONTRACTOR and LEA shall satisfy the State Meal Mandate under California Education Code sections 49530, 49530.5 and 49550.