Control; Processes Clause Samples

The 'Control; Processes' clause defines how control over certain activities or operations is managed and outlines the procedures that must be followed. It typically specifies which party has authority to direct specific processes, such as decision-making, approvals, or oversight, and may detail the steps required for compliance or reporting. This clause ensures that responsibilities are clearly allocated and that standardized processes are followed, thereby reducing confusion and minimizing the risk of disputes over control or procedural errors.
Control; Processes. Micron will, or will cause the relevant Subsidiary of Micron to, review with Intel any reasonable control and process mechanisms applicable to the manufacture of all Qualified Probed Wafers sold by Micron under this Agreement, including but not limited to such mechanisms that are utilized to meet or exceed the Specifications for the Qualified Probed Wafers. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms including the following: [***]; and [***]; provided, however, that Micron will not be required to bear any expense relating to Intel’s control and process mechanism requests that are in addition to those used by Micron or its relevant affiliates. Micron will promptly notify Intel of all Excursions, which may impact scheduled commitments to Intel.
Control; Processes. The Joint Venture Company and Micron will review the Joint Venture Company's control and process mechanisms, including but not limited to such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specification, including the Performance Criteria, are met or exceeded in the Joint Venture Company's manufacture of Probed Wafers by either the Joint Venture Company or its approved subcontractor for Micron. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms including the following: ****.
Control; Processes. The Joint Venture Company and Intel will review the Joint Venture Company's control and process mechanisms, including but not limited to such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specification, including the Performance Criteria, are met or exceeded in the Joint Venture Company's manufacture of Probed Wafers by either the Joint Venture Company or its approved subcontractor for Intel. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms including the following: ****.
Control; Processes. The Purchaser and Inotera shall review Inotera’s control and process mechanisms, including such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specifications and Performance Criteria are met or exceeded in Inotera’s manufacture of Conforming Wafers. The Purchaser and Inotera agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms, including the following: (a) e-test (also known as parametric test capability); (b) qualification methodology plan; (c) product qualification support; (d) Probe Testing capability; (e) change control process; and (f) failure analysis capability and methodology. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, the Purchaser and Inotera agree to the control and process mechanisms set forth in Schedule 1.1.
Control; Processes. The Parties shall review the Joint Venture Company’s control and process mechanisms, including such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specifications and Performance Criteria are met or exceeded in the Joint Venture Company’s manufacture of Conforming Wafers. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms, including the following: [***].
Control; Processes. The Purchaser and Inotera shall review Inotera's control and process mechanisms, including such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specifications and Performance Criteria are met or exceeded in Inotera's manufacture of Conforming Wafers. The Purchaser and Inotera agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms, including the following: [***].
Control; Processes. The Joint Venture Company and Intel Singapore will review the Joint Venture Company’s control and process mechanisms, including but not limited to such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specification, including the Performance Criteria, are met or exceeded in the Joint Venture Company’s manufacture of Products by either the Joint Venture Company or its approved subcontractor for Intel Singapore. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms including the following: [***].
Control; Processes. The Joint Venture Company and Micron Singapore will review the Joint Venture Company’s control and process mechanisms, including but not limited to such mechanisms that are utilized to ensure that all parameters of the Specification, including the Performance Criteria, are met or exceeded in the Joint Venture Company’s manufacture of Products by either the Joint Venture Company or its approved subcontractor for Micron Singapore. The Parties agree to work together in good faith to define mutually agreeable control and process mechanisms including the following: [***].
Control; Processes 

Related to Control; Processes

  • Quality Control Procedures The Seller shall have an internal quality control program that verifies, on a regular basis, the existence and accuracy of the legal documents, credit documents, property appraisals, and underwriting decisions. The program shall include evaluating and monitoring the overall quality of the Seller's loan production and the servicing activities of the Seller. The program is to ensure that the Mortgage Loans are originated and serviced in accordance with Accepted Servicing Standards and the Underwriting Guidelines; guard against dishonest, fraudulent, or negligent acts; and guard against errors and omissions by officers, employees, or other authorized persons.

  • Change Control Procedures (a) No changes or additions may be made to any Work Order without the written agreement of LAUSD as evidenced by a duly executed Change Order. (b) Contractor will not take an action or make a decision which may have a material effect on LAUSD or which adversely affects the function or performance of, or decreases the resource efficiency of, the Services, including implementing changes in technology or equipment and software configuration, without first obtaining LAUSD’s written approval, which approval LAUSD may withhold in its sole discretion as respects any change which may have an adverse effect on LAUSD or the Services.

  • Processes Any employer, employee, trade union or employer’s association may at any point in time apply for an exemption from any of the provisions of this Collective Agreement. The applicant is required to complete and submit in writing with the relevant office of the Council, a fully and properly completed prescribed application for exemption form, accompanied by all relevant supporting documentation.

  • Quality Control Program Engineer shall have a quality control program in place that ensures that all deliverable work is of high quality. Engineer shall submit a plan detailing its program to the Inspection Branch of the TxDOT Bridge Division for review and approval prior to beginning work. State may review or audit the programs.

  • Recall Procedures ‌ A. Eligibility to be recalled from layoff and employment shall terminate after fourteen (14) months. Employees shall be recalled from layoff based on seniority in the following order: 1. Employees shall be recalled to the position from which they were laid off starting within the employee’s Department; or, 2. Employees shall be recalled to other positions within the position series from which they were laid off starting with the employee’s Department and then other Departments, provided the employee possesses the qualifications, performance record, aptitude, and ability to perform the work; or 3. Employees shall be recalled to other positions the employee previously held, provided the employee completed probation in that position starting with the employee’s Department and then other Departments, and provided the employee possesses the qualifications, performance record, aptitude, and ability to perform the work. 4. Employees shall be recalled from layoff into vacant County positions not previously held provided: 1) The employee possesses the qualifications, performance record, aptitude, ability to perform the work, and the ability to meet the minimum requirements for the position as defined in the job description; and 2) The employee specifies in writing to the Human Resources Office, within thirty (30) days of the date of layoff, the position(s) they want to be considered for recall. B. Employees on layoff who have been offered recall, and who have voluntarily refused such recall, shall be removed from the recall list and their employment shall be terminated. A form provided by the Human Resources Office signed by the employee shall document this recall refusal. C. When necessary, the Human Resources Director shall determine the recalled employee’s qualifications, performance record, aptitude, and ability to perform the work through discussions with the applicable Supervisor and a meeting with the employee. The employee shall be notified of the right to have a representative of his or her choosing present. If there is a disagreement over the County not allowing the employee to exercise recall rights, the Human Resources Director shall document this disagreement. D. After finding out more information about a specific job(s), a recalled employee may decide their overall qualifications, aptitude and ability are not compatible with the requirements of the job and may request to remain on the County recall list rather than pursue recall to the available position. Authorization to remain on layoff status, and return to the recall list after declining recall, must be mutually agreed upon. A form produced by the Human Resources Office and signed by the employee shall document this process. E. Laid off employees shall report to work on the date specified in the notice of recall, such date shall be not less than fourteen (14) days from the date of the notice unless mutually agreed upon.