Correlation of eIDAS and e-CODEX Clause Samples

Correlation of eIDAS and e-CODEX. As pointed out above, eIDAS is a provider of security standards and e-CODEX is a user of security standards. It is therefore the question whether and how e-CODEX can benefit from the standards established by eIDAS. The e-CODEX Consortium has often been asked whether e-CODEX is compliant with eIDAS. In the subsequent chapters it will be shown that this is not the correct question to ask. The question to be answered in this document is: can e-CODEX be used with the standards which eIDAS establishes? Additionally, it will be analysed, what e-CODEX can do to support additional levels of security or authentication. Finally, it is necessary to point out that according to Art 2/2, “this Regulation does not apply to the provision of trust services that are used exclusively within closed systems resulting from national law or from agreements between a defined set of participants.” At first glance it might seem, that thus the eIDAS regulation does not apply to e-CODEX, as it is mostly used by a restricted circle of participants. However, e-CODEX was designed to be used by everybody interested in cross-border judicial proceedings. As such, e-CODEX can be used and is open nowadays e.g. for all Austrian lawyers (approx. 5000 persons) for the use case of the European Payment Order. Further, once the e-Justice Portal of the European Commission5 connects its online forms6 for the European Payment Order and the forms for Small Claims to the e-CODEX system (currently planned for late 2021), then e-CODEX can and will be used by potentially all European citizens. Therefore, e-CODEX cannot be regarded as a closed system (anymore) and is thus subject to the eIDAS regulation. 4 See ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/tech, section “Security” 5 ▇▇▇▇▇://▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ 6 ▇▇▇▇▇://▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/155/EN/online_forms As described in the introduction above, eIDAS provides a vast set of standards for different levels of security. It describes the requirements to meet these standards, but it does not oblige communication participants to implement those standards. (It does, however, establish the principle of mutual recognition of electronic identification under certain circumstances [Art 6, 27]). eIDAS can therefore be seen as a toolbox where communication participants can choose the most appropriate tools from to secure and authenticate their communication. This chapter intends to highlight the most e-CODEX-relevant tools of this eIDAS toolbox.
View Source

Related to Correlation of eIDAS and e-CODEX

  • Requirements Pertaining Only to Federal Grants and Subrecipient Agreements If this Agreement is a grant that is funded in whole or in part by Federal funds:

  • UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS Seller agrees to actively seek out and provide the maximum practicable opportunities for small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, minority business enterprises, historically black colleges and universities and minority institutions, Historically Underutilized Business Zone small business concerns and US Veteran and Service-Disabled Veteran Owned small business concerns to participate in the subcontracts Seller awards to the fullest extent consistent with the efficient performance of this Contract.

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “ (1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “ (1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • SWEATFREE CODE OF CONDUCT a. All Contractors contracting for the procurement or laundering of apparel, garments or corresponding accessories, or the procurement of equipment, materials, or supplies, other than procurement related to a public works contract, declare under penalty of perjury that no apparel, garments or corresponding accessories, equipment, materials, or supplies furnished to the state pursuant to the contract have been laundered or produced in whole or in part by sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor, or with the benefit of sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor. The contractor further declares under penalty of perjury that they adhere to the Sweatfree Code of Conduct as set forth on the California Department of Industrial Relations website located at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇, and Public Contract Code Section 6108. b. The contractor agrees to cooperate fully in providing reasonable access to the contractor’s records, documents, agents or employees, or premises if reasonably required by authorized officials of the contracting agency, the Department of Industrial Relations, or the Department of Justice to determine the contractor’s compliance with the requirements under paragraph (a).

  • Compliance with Federal Law, Regulations, and Executive Orders This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance will be used to fund all or a portion of the contract. The contractor will comply with all applicable Federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives.