COST CONSIDERATIONS Sample Clauses
COST CONSIDERATIONS. This agreement does not authorize financial expenditures by the COG on behalf of FEMA. The FEMA IPAWS Program is responsible for the costs associated with developing, operating and maintaining the availability of the IPAWS-OPEN system. The COG is responsible for all costs related to providing their users with access to IPAWS- OPEN via the public Internet. These costs may include hardware, software, monthly Internet charges, completion of security awareness training and other related jurisdictional costs.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Both parties agree to be responsible for their own systems and costs of the interconnecting mechanism and/or media. No financial commitments to reimburse the other party shall be made without the written concurrence of both parties. Modifications to either system that are necessary to support the interconnection are the responsibility of the respective system/network owners’ organization. This ISA neither authorizes, requires, nor precludes any transfer of funds without the agreement of both parties.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Public Representative comments. As
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Postal Service presents a financial analysis showing that Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 5 results in cost savings while ensuring that the contract covers its attributable costs, does not result in subsidization of competitive products by market dominant products, and increases contribution from competitive products.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. 1. The plan developed pursuant to Section D.5 shall address at a minimum the following criteria:
a. The estimated Capital Costs and O&M Costs and cost basis of any proposed facilities (whether new or modified at Blue Plains or at any other facilities or sites) shall be consistent with the MJUFs and cost allocations, as defined in Section 5;
b. The proposed allocation of Capital Costs and O&M Costs;
c. The anticipated schedule for when funds to support these actions are likely to be needed.
2. The rental or sale of Allocated Flow Capacity shall be at the discretion of the Party which is providing the Allocated Flow Capacity for rent or sale.
3. The Parties to the rental or sale transaction shall mutually agree on the cost basis for the rental or sale of Allocated Flow Capacity.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Provide annual fee for services identified in the Scope of Work for each year of the contract term (5 fiscal years – July to June). July 2020 – June 2021 (Annual Fee) $59,000 July 2021 – June 2022 (Annual Fee) $60,000 July 2022 – June 2023 (Annual Fee) $61,000 July 2023 – June 2024 (Annual Fee) $62,000 July 2024 – June 2025 (Annual Fee) $63,000 Actuarial Analysis $7,500 - $15,000 Conduct TPA Audit $10,000 - $15,000 D. Conformance to RFP ▇▇▇▇ Companies offers Mobile Benefits Solutions to provide your employees with 24/7 access to employee benefit information from any mobile device. The app is designed to help employees easily use and better understand their benefits, saving both the member and company valuable time and money. ▇▇▇▇ COMPANIES OF ARIZONA | ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ | Suite 129 | Phoenix | AZ | 85018 City of ABC 2019-2020 Plan Year - Renewal Projection Dashboard EE EE+SP EE+CH Fam EE EE+SP EE+CH Fam 1 The City of ABC Medical Plan Projection is increasing by 6.8% CIGNA OAP February 1, 2019 4 Prior Year Renewal Info > Prior year renewal increase was 8.2%.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. The Commission reviews competitive product prices to ensure that each product covers its attributable costs, does not cause market dominant products to subsidize competitive products, and contributes to the Postal Service’s institutional costs. 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a); 39 C.F.R. §§ 3015.5 and 3015.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. 2.1 Should PUCKA request the additional support, the cost shall be paid for these services under the provisions of the basic AGREEMENT.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. Both parties agree to share the costs of the interconnecting mechanisms and/or media. Percentage of cost assumed by each organization (e.g., 50/50, 40/60, etc.) must be agreed upon in advance, and no such expenditures or financial commitments shall be made without the written concurrence of both parties. Modifications to either system that are necessary to support the interconnection are the responsibility of the respective system owner’s organization.
COST CONSIDERATIONS. 1. Software development is likely the greatest initial cost in transitioning to electronic data collection. Observers presently use 16 separate data forms (Appendix 1), many of which are multi-page, so data entry screens for as many as 30 different pages would be needed. Because observers need to be able to fill various forms concurrently during a set, it will be critical that this software allow quick and efficient transitions among forms, while auto-saving the data recorded. Additionally, since observers also make hand-written notes and sketches, reliable handwriting recognition will be needed. No such software exists, and would need to be developed before even a pilot study can be conducted. No quotes have been solicited from potential vendors yet because of the significant amount of staff time required to develop a specification. However, given the scope of the task, the number of forms involved, and the transition efficiency required, the cost will likely be substantial: US$ 150,000, assuming a conservative rate of US$ 50/hour for development and 3,000 hours, and could well be higher. It should also be noted that observer forms evolve, in accordance with the requirements of the scientists using the information and the demands for data by governments. Modifying paper forms is simple; modifying electronic forms requires greater expertise, and is therefore more expensive. Instruction in data collection is the most time-consuming part of observer training. Electronic data collection would require additional training, and thus additional expense. Observers would still need to be trained to use paper forms, because electronic equipment can malfunction, and paper forms would be needed as a back-up at sea.
2. Tablet computers and associated electronic equipment would be the other major cost. Examples would be the Dell Latitude 12” Rugged Tablet (US$ 1,850) and the Rock Seven Mobile Rockstar satellite-capable communication gear (US$ 660), for a total of US$ 25,100 for a pilot project using 10 units, disproportionately small relative to the initial investment in software development. The equipment costs for a full transition to electronic data collection would be considerable. In 2016 there were as many as 97 IATTC observers at sea concurrently, so the initial cost of equipping them all would be about US$ 250,000. This does not include repair, maintenance, and replacement costs; given the working conditions, it is reasonable to assume the tablets would need to ...