Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Clause Samples
The 'Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates' clause defines how expenses incurred from the mutual management and coordination of flowgates—key points in an electrical grid that control power flow—are allocated between parties. In practice, this clause typically outlines which party is responsible for costs such as monitoring, maintenance, or upgrades required to ensure efficient and reliable operation of shared flowgates. By clearly assigning financial responsibility, the clause helps prevent disputes and ensures that both parties contribute fairly to the ongoing coordination necessary for grid stability.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s Flowgate, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch. Southwest Power Pool - Rate Schedules and Seams Agreements Tariff - MISO-SPP Joint Operating Agreement - Rate Schedule 9 Article VI - Rate Schedule 9 Section 6.3
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. During Phase 2 and Phase 3. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, during Phase 2, Market to Non-Market, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s flowgate, or during ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Market, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch to the extent the costs may be recovered under the Party’s OATT.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. Each Party and Reciprocal Entity shall bear its own costs, if any, of compliance with the Congestion Management Process and this Article.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. During Phase 1 and Phase 2. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, during Phase 1, Market to Non-Market, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s Flowgate, or during Phase 2, Market to Market, as set forth in Article XI, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch, except that if that Party is unable to recover the costs of redispatch under its OATT or under some other agreement, then redispatch need not be provided under this Section 6.2. Prior to Phase 2, each Party will seek any necessary amendments to its OATT or governing documents in order to recover such costs during Phase 2.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. Version: 0.0.0 Effective: 3/25/2011