Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows: (a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2) The organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2) The the organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 76, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(3)(A)(i) The organization had 1,000 200 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+3
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(3) The relevant unit of the organization had 1,000 200 or more employees and an individual one or more individuals within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+3
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 75, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(4) The organization relevant unit had 1,000 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+2
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The organization Organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Biomet Inc), Deferred Prosecution Agreement (LVB Acquisition, Inc.)
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2) The organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization +3 participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4offense
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2) The organization Organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant tolerance of the offense by substantial authority personnel was pervasive throughout the organization +4
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Plea Agreement, Guilty Plea Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, condoned or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5 (g)(2) Cooperation and Acceptance -2
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Plea Agreement, Plea Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 710, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant tolerance of the offense +4by substantial authority personnel was pervasive throughout the organization +5
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 5
(b)(2b) The (2) the organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.)
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 712, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 5
(b)(21) The organization had 1,000 which the offense was committed had 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Plea Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 74, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(5) The the unit of the organization within which the offense was committed had 1,000 10 or more employees and an individual within high-level with substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+1
Appears in 1 contract
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 75, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(4) The the organization had 1,000 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+2
(1) The organization fully cooperated in the investigation and clearly demonstrated recognition and affirmative acceptance of responsibility for its criminal conduct -2 TOTAL 5 Calculation of Fine Range: Base Fine $446,000,000 Multipliers 1.0 (min)/2.0 (max) Fine Range $446,000,000 / $892,000,000
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Plea Agreement (Alcoa Inc)
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 710, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(3) The the organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4offense
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.)
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows: EXAMPLE:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(l) The the unit of the organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 79, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The the unit of the organization within which the offense was committed had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Plea Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:5,
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(4) The organization had 1,000 50 or more employees and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+2
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated summarized as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1)(A) Involvement in or Tolerance of Criminal Activity The organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization unit participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4offense; +5
Appears in 1 contract
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 75, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(5) The organization had 1,000 10 or more employees +1 and an individual within high-level substantial authority personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4offense
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 76, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(3) The the organization had 1,000 200 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+3
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The the organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2 TOTAL 8
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 7, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2) The organization had 1,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. USSG § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The the organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Culpability Score. Based upon U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the culpability score is 78, calculated as follows:
(a) Base Culpability Score 5 (b)(2b)(1) The the organization had 1,000 5,000 or more employees and an individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or was willfully ignorant of the offense +4+5 (g)(2) Cooperation, Acceptance -2 TOTAL 8 Calculation of Fine Range: Base Fine $150,000,000 Multipliers 1.6 (min)/ 3.2 (max) Fine Range $240,000,000 / $480,000,000
Appears in 1 contract