Decision to Lay Off Sample Clauses

The 'Decision to Lay Off' clause defines the employer's right and process for terminating employees due to business needs, such as restructuring, downsizing, or economic challenges. Typically, this clause outlines the circumstances under which layoffs may occur, the notice period required, and any severance or support that may be provided to affected employees. Its core function is to clarify the employer's authority to make workforce reductions and to set expectations for both parties, thereby reducing uncertainty and potential disputes during organizational changes.
Decision to Lay Off. Whenever it becomes necessary to reduce hours or lay off employees for lack of work or lack of funds, the procedure shall be as delineated in this Article. The decision to layoff or reduce hours is solely that of the Board and shall not be bargainable or grievable. The District agrees to meet and negotiate with PSEA regarding the decision and impacts and effects to implement an across- the-board work year reduction for all classifications of employees in the PSEA bargaining unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District retains the unrestricted right and discretion to lay off individual employees and to reduce daily assignments, annual days of service and months of service for individual employees and particular classifications of employees. PSEA and the district agree the provisions of this section shall continue and shall be operative beyond the expiration of this Agreement or any successor agreement.
View SourceView Similar (10)
Decision to Lay Off. 1668 28.1.1 A decision to lay off classified employees is solely within the 1669 discretion of the Board of Trustees. A layoff may involve a 1670 reduction of an entire position or a portion of a position. 1672 Union’s right to negotiate over the impact or the effects of a 1673 particular layoff or reduction in hours to the extent that this 1674 Article does not cover the impact or effects, nor does it waive 1675 the Union’s right to negotiate the District’s decision to reduce
View SourceView Similar (4)
Decision to Lay Off a) A decision to lay off classified workers for lack of work or funds is solely within the discretion of the Board of Trustees. b) Prior to a reduction in force affecting members of the bargaining unit, the District intends to use attrition, if possible, to avoid layoffs of unit members. This shall not be construed to require the District to keep unit members to provide services the District has decided to discontinue. c) The District will notify the Union of impending layoffs as far in advance as possible and will meet with the Union, if requested, in order to discuss the reasons for, and alternatives, to the proposed layoff. After such meeting, if any, has taken place, the District may in its discretion proceed with the layoff decision and that decision shall not be subject to the parties’ grievance procedure or otherwise be challengeable. The parties may also, upon mutual agreement, meet over effects not covered by Section 16.6 of this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Decision to Lay Off. 1729 A decision to lay off classified employees is solely within the discretion of 1730 the Board of Trustees. A layoff may involve a reduction of an entire 1731 position or a portion of a position. 1732 This Agreement on layoff procedures does not waive the Union’s right to 1733 negotiate over the impact or the effects of a particular layoff or reduction in 1734 hours to the extent that this Article does not cover the impact or effects, 1735 nor does it waive the Union’s right to negotiate the District’s decision to 1736 reduce the regularly assigned hours.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Decision to Lay Off a) A decision to lay off classified workers for lack of work or funds is solely within the discretion of the Board of Trustees. b) Prior to a reduction in force affecting members of the bargaining unit, the District intends to use attrition, if possible, to avoid layoffs of unit members. This shall not be construed to require the District to keep unit members to provide services the District has decided to discontinue. c) The District will notify the Union of impending layoffs as far in advance as possible and will meet with the Union, if requested, in order to discuss the reasons for, and alternatives, to the proposed layoff. The parties may also, upon mutual agreement, meet over effects not covered by Section 16.6 of this Agreement.
View Source
Decision to Lay Off. 35 Whenever it becomes necessary to reduce hours or lay off employees for lack of 36 work or lack of funds, the procedure shall be as delineated in this Article. The 37 decision to lay off or reduce hours is solely that of the Board and shall not be 38 bargainable or grievable. 39
View Source

Related to Decision to Lay Off

  • Decision to Purchase The Assignee represents and warrants that it is a sophisticated investor able to evaluate the risks and merits of the transactions contemplated hereby, and that it has not relied in connection therewith upon any statements or representations of the Assignor or the Servicer other than those contained in the Servicing Agreement or this Assignment Agreement.

  • Attorney Review The Purchaser acknowledges that Purchaser has had the opportunity to consult with its legal counsel regarding the Agreement and that accordingly the terms of the Agreement are not to be construed against any party because that party drafted the Agreement or construed in favor of any Party because that Party failed to understand the legal effect of the provisions of the Agreement.

  • Decision on Review No later than sixty (60) days (forty-five (45) days with respect to a claim for benefits due to Executive being Permanently Disabled) following the receipt of the written application for review, the Claims Administrator or the Appeals Fiduciary, as applicable, shall submit its decision on the review in writing to the claimant involved and to his representative, if any, unless the Claims Administrator or Appeals Fiduciary determines that special circumstances (such as the need to hold a hearing) require an extension of time, to a day no later than one hundred twenty (120) days (ninety (90) days with respect to a claim for benefits due to Executive being Permanently Disabled) after the date of receipt of the written application for review. If the Claims Administrator or Appeals Fiduciary determines that the extension of time is required, the Claims Administrator or Appeals Fiduciary shall furnish to the claimant written notice of the extension before the expiration of the initial sixty (60) day (forty-five (45) days with respect to a claim for benefits due to Executive being Permanently Disabled) period. The extension notice shall indicate the special circumstances requiring an extension of time and the date by which the Claims Administrator or Appeals Fiduciary expects to render its decision on review. In the case of a decision adverse to the claimant, the Claims Administrator or Appeals Fiduciary shall provide to the claimant written notice of the denial. Any such notice of an adverse benefit determination shall be written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant (and with respect to a claim for benefits due to Executive being Permanently Disabled, be provided in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner) and shall include: (1) the specific reason or reasons for the adverse benefit determination; (2) specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the adverse benefit determination is based; (3) a statement that the claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the claimant’s claim for benefits; (4) a statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA following the adverse benefit determination on review; (5) a statement regarding the availability of other voluntary alternative dispute resolution options; (6) in the case of a claim for benefits due to Executive being Permanently Disabled: (A) a description of any contractual limitations period that applies to the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA, including the calendar date on which the contractual limitations period expires for the claim; (B) a discussion of the decision, including an explanation of the basis for disagreeing with or not following: the views presented by the claimant to the Agreement of health care professionals treating the claimant and vocational professionals who evaluated the claimant, the views of medical or vocational professionals whose advice was obtained on behalf of the Agreement in connection with a claimant’s adverse benefit determination, without regard to whether the advice was relied upon in making the determination, and a disability determination regarding the claimant presented by the claimant to the Agreement made by the Social Security Administration; (C) if the adverse benefit determination is based on a medical necessity or experimental treatment or similar exclusion or limit, either an explanation of the scientific or clinical judgment for the determination, applying the terms of the Agreement to the claimant’s medical circumstances, or a statement that such explanation will be provided free of charge upon request; and (D) the specific internal rules, guidelines, protocols, standards or other similar criteria of the Agreement relied upon in making the adverse determination, or a statement that such rules, guidelines, protocols, standards or other similar criteria do not exist. The Claims Administrator has the discretionary authority to determine all interpretative issues arising under this Agreement and the interpretations of the Claims Administrator shall be final and binding upon Executive or any other party claiming benefits under this Agreement.

  • Decision Making The Joint Development Committee and Joint Commercialization Committee shall each act by unanimous agreement of its members, with each Party having one vote. If the Joint Development Committee or Joint Commercialization Committee, after [* * *] (or such other period as the Parties may otherwise agree) of good faith efforts to reach a unanimous decision on an issue, fails to reach such a unanimous decision, then either Party may refer such issue to the Executive Officers. Such Executive Officers shall meet promptly thereafter and shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the issues. If Executive Officers cannot resolve such issue within [* * *] of referral of such issue to the Executive Officers, the resolution of such issue shall be as follows: (a) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Development Committee, determined by the Developing Party of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product at issue; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) if Acceleron is the Developing Party and such issue relates to (x) the approval of an Additional Development Disease, or (y) matters under Section 5.6.3(d), then such issue shall be determined by [* * *]; (ii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the Joint Development Committee’s decision to go forward with a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product; provided that [* * *] shall continue to determine any issues that relate to the budget for and the conduct of the [* * *]; and (iii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the occurrence of any [* * *]; and (b) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Commercialization Committee, determined by Celgene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Acceleron, Celgene, the Joint Development Committee or the Joint Commercialization Committee may make any decision inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of each Party.

  • Right of Appeal 13.1 If the Administrator: 13.1.1 decides not to certify a facility or to vary a certificate which has been issued; 13.1.2 serves a notice imposing a buy-out fee under Rule 7 upon determining that a target unit has failed to meet its target; or 13.1.3 decides to vary or not to vary the target for a target unit, the Operator may appeal to the Tribunal against the decision. 13.2 In respect of an Operator which enters into an agreement after 1 April 2013, the Operator may appeal to the Tribunal against the target that has been set for the target unit by the Administrator. 13.3 For the purposes of Rule 13.2, the date on which notice of the decision is deemed to have been sent to the Operator is the later of the date the agreement is entered into or the date the Administrator sends notice to the Operator of the target for the target unit. 13.4 The grounds on which an Operator may appeal under Rule 13.1 and 13.2 are: 13.4.1 that the decision was based on an error of fact; 13.4.2 that the decision was wrong in law; 13.4.3 that the decision was unreasonable; 13.4.4 any other reason. 13.5 The bringing of an appeal suspends the effect of the decision pending final determination by the Tribunal of the appeal or its withdrawal. 13.6 On determining an appeal under these Rules the Tribunal must either: 13.6.1 affirm the decision; 13.6.2 quash the decision; or 13.6.3 vary the decision.