Design Three Sample Clauses

The 'Design Three' clause establishes the requirements and standards for the third iteration or version of a design within a contract or project. Typically, this clause outlines the specific deliverables, timelines, and approval processes associated with the third design phase, ensuring that both parties understand what is expected at this stage. For example, it may specify the level of detail, materials to be used, or performance criteria that must be met. The core function of this clause is to provide clear guidance and expectations for the third design stage, reducing misunderstandings and helping to keep the project on track.
Design Three. SBC-AMERITECH will provide fiber cable to the last entrance (or CLEC designated) manhole at CLEC location. CLEC shall make all necessary preparations to receive and to allow and enable SBC-AMERITECH to deliver fiber optic facilities into that manhole. SBC-AMERITECH will provide a sufficient length of Optical Fire Resistant (“OFR”) cable for CLEC to run the fiber cable from the manhole and terminate on CLEC fiber distribution frame (“FDF”) in CLEC’s location. SBC-AMERITECH shall deliver and maintain such strands wholly at its own expense up to the POI. CLEC shall take the fiber from the manhole and terminate it inside CLEC’s office on the FDF at CLEC’s expense. In this case the POI shall be at CLEC designated manhole location.
View SourceView Similar (12)
Design Three. Both BendTel and CenturyLink each provide two fibers between their locations. This design may only be considered where existing fibers are available and there is a mutual benefit to both Parties. CenturyLink will provide the fibers associated with the “working” side of the system. BendTel will provide the fibers associated with the “protection” side of the system. The Parties will work cooperatively to terminate each other’s fiber in order to provision this joint SONET ring or point-to-point linear system. Both Parties will work cooperatively to determine the appropriate technical handoff for purposes of demarcation and fault isolation. The POI will be defined as being at the CenturyLink location. 2.3.2.5 The BendTel location includes FOTs, multiplexing and fiber required to terminate the optical signal provided from CenturyLink. This location is BendTel’s responsibility to provision and maintain. 2.3.2.6 The CenturyLink location includes all CenturyLink FOTs, multiplexing and fiber required to terminate the optical signal provided from BendTel. This location is CenturyLink's responsibility to provision and maintain. 2.3.2.7 Pursuant to the mutually agreed upon implementation terms of BendTel’s Fiber Meet BFR, CenturyLink and BendTel shall procure, install, and maintain the agreed-upon FOT equipment in each of their locations where the Parties established a Fiber Meet. Capacity shall be sufficient to provision and maintain all trunk groups prescribed by Section 3 of this Article for the purposes of Interconnection. 2.3.2.8 Each Party shall provide its own, unique source for the synchronized timing of its FOT equipment. At a minimum, each timing source must be Stratum-3 traceable and cannot be provided over DS0/DS1 facilities, via Line Timing; or via a Derived DS1 off of FOT equipment. Both Parties agree to establish separate and distinct timing sources that are not derived from the other, and meet the criteria identified above. 2.3.2.9 BendTel and CenturyLink will mutually agree on the capacity of the FOT(s) to be utilized based on equivalent DS1s or DS3s. Each Party will also agree upon the optical frequency and wavelength necessary to implement the Interconnection. The Parties will develop and agree upon methods for the capacity planning and management for these facilities, terms and conditions for over provisioning facilities, and the necessary processes to implement facilities as indicated below. These methods will meet quality standards as mutually ag...
View SourceView Similar (7)
Design Three. SBC-AMERITECH will provide fiber cable to the last entrance (or AT&T designated) manhole at AT&T location. AT&T shall make all necessary preparations to receive and to allow and enable SBC-AMERITECH to deliver fiber optic facilities into that manhole. SBC-AMERITECH will provide a sufficient length of Optical Fire Resistant (“OFR”) cable for AT&T to run the fiber cable from the manhole and terminate on AT&T fiber distribution frame (“FDF”) in AT&T’s location. SBC-AMERITECH shall deliver and maintain such strands wholly at its own expense up to the POI. AT&T shall take the fiber from the manhole and terminate it inside AT&T’s office on the FDF at AT&T’s expense. In this case the POI shall be at AT&T designated manhole location.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Design Three. Both CenturyLink QCC and CenturyLink each provide two fibers between their locations. This design may only be considered where existing fibers are available and there is a mutual benefit to both Parties. CenturyLink will provide the fibers associated with the “working” side of the system. CenturyLink QCC will provide the fibers associated with the “protection” side of the system. The Parties will work cooperatively to terminate each other’s fiber in order to provision this joint SONET ring or point-to-point linear system. Both Parties will work cooperatively to determine the appropriate technical handoff for purposes of demarcation and fault isolation. The POI will be defined as being at the CenturyLink location.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Design Three. AT&T 4-STATE will provide fiber cable to the last entrance (or CLEC designated) manhole at CLEC location. CLEC shall make all necessary preparations to receive and to allow and enable AT&T 4-STATE to deliver fiber optic facilities into that manhole. AT&T 4-STATE will provide a sufficient length of Optical Fire Resistant (“OFR”) cable for CLEC to run the fiber cable from the manhole and terminate on CLEC fiber distribution frame (“FDF”) in CLEC’s location. AT&T 4-STATE shall deliver and maintain such strands wholly at its own expense up to the POI. CLEC shall take the fiber from the manhole and terminate it inside CLEC’s office on the FDF at CLEC’s expense. In this case the POI shall be at CLEC designated manhole location.
View Source
Design Three. SBC will provide fiber cable to the last entrance (or CLEC designated) manhole at CLEC location. CLEC shall make all necessary preparations to receive and to allow and enable SBC to deliver fiber optic facilities into that manhole. SBC will provide a sufficient length of Optical Fire Resistant (“OFR”) cable for CLEC to run the fiber cable from the manhole and terminate on CLEC fiber distribution frame (“FDF”) in CLEC’s location. SBC shall deliver and maintain such strands wholly at its own expense up to the POI. CLEC shall take the fiber from the manhole and terminate it inside CLEC’s office on the FDF at CLEC’s expense. In this case the POI shall be at CLEC designated manhole location.
View Source

Related to Design Three

  • Design Phase All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement with the exception of Interdisciplinary Document Coordination Review, conducting a Card Trick session, Value-Engineering services, Estimating services. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Improvement Allowance Subject to the terms hereof, Landlord shall grant an allowance to Tenant in an amount not to exceed the aggregate of (a) Six Million Eight Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($6,870,000.00) (the “Basic Improvement Allowance”) to be used solely to reimburse the Tenant for the Itemized Costs, and (b) One Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,300,000.00) (the “HVAC Allowance” and together with the Basic Improvement Allowance, the “Improvement Allowance”) to be used solely to reimburse the Tenant for that portion of the Itemized Costs of replacing the HVAC units serving the Premises and related control systems . The Improvement Allowance shall be available for disbursement subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof (including the Work Letter), provided that at no time shall Landlord be required to make a disbursement of any of the Improvement Allowance if following such advance the aggregate amount of the Improvement Allowance advanced by Landlord would exceed Landlord’s Share of the aggregate amount of the Itemized Costs incurred by Tenant through such date. As used herein, “Landlord’s Share” means and refers to a fraction (expressed as a percentage), the numerator of which is the original amount of the Improvement Allowance and the denominator of which is the total amount of the Approved Budget (taking into account any increases in the Approved Budget, including increases as a result of change orders requested by Tenant and approved by Landlord in accordance with the terms of the Work Letter). Conditioned upon and provided that the Conditions Precedent (as defined below) are satisfied for each reimbursement request, and satisfied for each request no later than the date which is two (2) years after the Term Commencement Date (the “Required Completion Date”), Landlord shall pay to Tenant within thirty (30) days of satisfaction of the Conditions Precedent Landlord’s Share of the Itemized Costs The “Conditions Precedent” are: (a) Tenant is not in default under this Lease beyond any applicable notice and cure period provided in this Lease, and Tenant is in full compliance with all requirements under this Section 3.3 concerning Tenant’s Initial Work, (b) Tenant has complied with all of the terms and conditions of the Work Letter that are conditions precedent that required to be satisfied prior to the disbursement of any portion of the Improvement Allowance, and (c) Tenant has provided Landlord an itemized accounting of Tenant’s costs for such Tenant’s Initial Work for which it seeks reimbursement (“Itemized Costs”), of which not more than twenty-five (25%) percent shall be laboratory case work and soft costs, as more particularly set forth in the Work Letter.