Disagreement on content Sample Clauses

The "Disagreement on content" clause defines the process to follow when parties involved in an agreement cannot reach consensus on the substance or wording of a document or deliverable. Typically, this clause outlines steps such as negotiation, escalation to higher management, or even mediation to resolve the impasse. Its core function is to provide a clear, structured method for addressing and resolving disputes over content, thereby minimizing delays and ensuring that disagreements do not derail the overall project or agreement.
Disagreement on content. If the parties disagree on the form or content of the Scheme Booklet, they must consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Scheme Booklet. If complete agreement is not reached after reasonable consultation, then: (a) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of any information appearing in the Scheme Booklet other than the SPAC Information or the Pubco Information, the BTH Board will, acting in good faith, decide the final form or content of the disputed part of the Scheme Booklet; and (b) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of the SPAC Information or the Pubco information, BTH will make such amendments to the form or content of the disputed part of the SPAC Information or the Pubco Information as SPAC or Pubco, respectively, reasonably requires.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Disagreement on content. If the Bidder and the Target RE disagree on the form or content of the Explanatory Memorandum other than the Bidder Information, they must consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Explanatory Memorandum. If complete agreement is not reached after reasonable consultation, then: if the disagreement relates to the form or content of the Bidder Information contained in the Explanatory Memorandum, the Target RE will make the amendments that the Bidder reasonably requires; and if the disagreement relates to the form or content of any other part of the Explanatory Memorandum, the Target RE Independent Directors will, acting in good faith, decide the final form or content of the disputed part of the Explanatory Memorandum.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Disagreement on content. If Superloop and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ disagree on the form or content of the Scheme Booklet, they must consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Scheme Booklet. If complete agreement is not reached after reasonable consultation, then: (a) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of any information appearing in the Scheme Booklet other than the Superloop Information, the BigAir Board will, acting in good faith, decide the final form or content of the disputed part of the Scheme Booklet; and (b) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of the Superloop Information, BigAir will make such amendments to the form or content of the disputed part of the Superloop Information as Superloop reasonably requires.
View Source
Disagreement on content. If Bidder and QMS disagree on the form or content of the Scheme Booklet, they must consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Scheme Booklet. If after two (2) Business Days complete agreement is not reached after reasonable consultation, then: (a) where the determination relates to Bidder Information, Bidder will make the final determination, acting reasonably, as to the form and content of the Bidder Information; and (b) in any other case, QMS, acting reasonably, will make the final determination as to the form and content of the Scheme Booklet.
View Source
Disagreement on content. If ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ disagree on the form or content of the Scheme Booklet, they must act reasonably and consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Scheme Booklet. If complete agreement is not reached after a reasonable period of consultation, then: (a) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of the AMAL Information contained in the Scheme Booklet, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ will, acting in good faith, make such amendments as AMAL reasonably requires; and (b) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of any other part of the Scheme Booklet, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Board will, acting in good faith, decide the final form or content of the disputed part of the Scheme Booklet.
View Source
Disagreement on content. If RACQ and QTMB disagree on the form or content of the Scheme Booklet, they must consult in good faith to try to settle an agreed form of the Scheme Booklet. If complete agreement is not reached after reasonable consultation, then: (a) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of the RACQ Information contained in the Scheme Booklet, QTMB will make such amendments as RACQ, acting in good faith, reasonably requires; and (b) if the disagreement relates to the form or content of any other part of the Scheme Booklet, the QTMB Board will, acting in good faith, decide the final form or content of the disputed part of the Scheme Booklet.
View Source

Related to Disagreement on content

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Arbitration Board to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall make every effort to do within seven days.

  • Disagreement Any dissension between the parties other than a grievance defined in the agreement and other than a dispute defined in the Labour Code.

  • Disagreements Any dispute or other disagreement arising from or out of ------------- this Consulting Agreement shall be submitted to arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association and the decision of the arbiter(s) shall be enforceable in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Arbitration shall occur only in San Diego, CA. The interpretation and the enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California Law as applied to residents of the State of California relating to contracts executed in and to be performed solely within the State of California. In the event any dispute is arbitrated, the prevailing Party (as determined by the arbiter(s)) shall be entitled to recover that Party's reasonable attorney's fees incurred (as determined by the arbiter(s)).

  • CFR PART 200 AND FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXPLANATION TIPS and TIPS Members will sometimes seek to make purchases with federal funds. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (sometimes referred to as “▇▇▇▇▇”),Vendor's response to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will indicate Vendor's willingness and ability to comply with certain requirements which may be applicable to TIPS purchases paid for with federal funds, if accepted by Vendor. Your responses to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will dictate whether TIPS can list this awarded contract as viable to be considered for a federal fund purchase. Failure to certify all requirements labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will mean that your contract is listed as not viable for the receipt of federal funds. However, it will not prevent award. If you do enter into a TIPS Sale when you are accepting federal funds, the contract between you and the TIPS Member will likely require these same certifications.

  • Settlement of Disputes between Contracting Parties 1. Should any dispute arise concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement the Contracting Parties shall try to settle the dispute amicably. 2. If the dispute cannot be settled in a such manner it shall, upon the request of either Contracting Party, be submitted to an ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with the provisions of this Article. 3. The Arbitral Tribunal shall be constituted in the following way: within two months of the receipt of the request for arbitration, each Contracting Party shall appoint one arbitrator. The two arbitrators will choose a national of a third State who, on the approval by the two Contracting Parties, shall act as chairman of the Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Chairman"). The Chairman shall be appointed within two months from the date of appointment of the other two arbitrators. 4. If within the period specified in paragraph 3 of this Article either Contracting Party shall not have appointed its arbitrator or the two arbitrators shall not have agreed on the chairman, a request may be made to the President of the International Court of Justice to make the appointment. If he is a national of either Contracting Party or if he is otherwise prevented from discharging the said function, the Vice-President shall be invited to make the appointment. If the Vice-President also is a national of either Contracting Party or is prevented from discharging the said function, the member of the International Court of Justice next in seniority who is not a national of either Contracting Party shall be invited to make the appointment. 5. The Arbitral Tribunal shall reach its decision by a majority of votes, such decision shall be final and binding. Each contracting Party shall bear the costs of its own arbitrator and its counsel in the arbitral proceedings, the costs of the chairman and the remaining costs shall be borne in equal parts by both Contracting Parties. The Tribunal may, however, in its decision direct that a higher proportion of costs shall be borne by one of the two Contracting Parties. The Arbitral Tribunal shall determine its own procedure.