Dynamic Group Key Agreement Protocols Sample Clauses

Dynamic Group Key Agreement Protocols. The protocols mentioned before are all static group key agreement protocols. In static GKA protocols, when participants in the group change, the protocol needs to be started from the beginning. On the other hand, dynamic GKA protocols provide auxiliary operations (defined in Section 2.1.1) that require much less computation effort such as in [5, 6, 11, 20– 23]. To increase efficiency in group key computation, tree-based group key agreement pro- tocols are proposed in [5, 9]. Dutta et al. [5] propose a dynamic tree-based group key agree- ment protocol where participants are hierarchically positioned as a tree structure. In the lower leaves, subgroup of participants computes group key, and forwards to the participants at the upper leaves. And this process goes until the common group key is computed in the root of the tree. Alternative approaches are introduced by utilizing cluster structures in [6, 8]. ▇▇▇▇▇ et al. have proposed a cluster-based dynamic group key protocol called GKAP-MANET [6]. In this protocol, the participants are grouped as a set of a clusters and each cluster has a cluster head. Two types of communication occur between participants; first, between participants in the same cluster and second, between the cluster heads. Therefore, the cluster key is firstly agreed with the participants in the same cluster while, later on, cluster heads agree on the common group key. An asymmetric GKA protocol is proposed by Wu et al. in [14]. In this protocol, instead of participants agreeing on a symmetric group key, a public key is shared among the participants. This key is used to verify signatures, and encrypt transmitted messages. The shared public key corresponds to the private keys of the participants, which can only be generated by the owner. The participants use their private keys for decrypting and signing the messages. This protocol ensures key agreement in a single round.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Dynamic Group Key Agreement Protocols

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING CERTAIN FOREIGN-OWNED COMPANIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: Proposing Company is prohibited from entering into a contract or other agreement relating to critical infrastructure that would grant to the company direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure in this state, excluding access specifically allowed by the Proposing Company for product warranty and support purposes. Company, certifies that neither it nor its parent company nor any affiliate of company or its parent company, is (1) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of the company is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; (2) a company or other entity, including governmental entity, that is owned or controlled by citizens of or is directly controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; or (3) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country. For purposes of this contract, “critical infrastructure” means “a communication infrastructure system, cybersecurity system, electric grid, hazardous waste treatment system, or water treatment facility.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.0101(2) of SB 1226 (87th leg.). The company verifies and certifies that company will not grant direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure, except for product warranty and support purposes, to prohibited individuals, companies, or entities, including governmental entities, owned, controlled, or headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country, as determined by the Governor.

  • Description of Vendor Entity and Vendor's Goods & Services If awarded, this description of Vendor and Vendor's goods and services will appear on the TIPS website for customer/public viewing.

  • Compliance with Child, Family and Spousal Support Reporting Obligations Contractor’s failure to comply with state and federal child, family and spousal support reporting requirements regarding contractor’s employees or failure to implement lawfully served wage and earnings assignment orders or notices of assignment relating to child, family and spousal support obligations shall constitute a default under this Contract. Contractor’s failure to cure such default within ninety (90) days of notice by County shall be grounds for termination of this Contract.

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing 5.2.1 The Parties shall jointly establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks between CLEC and CBT by which they will jointly provide Tandem-transported Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic from and to CLEC's Customers. 5.2.2 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access and non-translated Toll Free traffic (e.g., 800/888) to allow CLEC’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier that is connected to the CBT access Tandem. 5.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be one-way or two-way trunks, as mutually agreed, connecting an End Office Switch that CLEC utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access Service in the given LATA to an access Tandem Switch CBT utilizes to provide Exchange Access in the LATA.

  • Enterprise Information Management Standards Performing Agency shall conform to HHS standards for data management as described by the policies of the HHS Chief Data and Analytics Officer. These include, but are not limited to, standards for documentation and communication of data models, metadata, and other data definition methods that are required by HHS for ongoing data governance, strategic portfolio analysis, interoperability planning, and valuation of HHS System data assets.