Dynamics Corp. of America, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of Indiana could, as a matter of corporate law and in particular those aspects of corporate law concerning corporate governance, constitutionally disqualify a potential acquirer from voting on the affairs of a target corporation without the prior approval of the remaining stockholders; provided that such laws were applicable only under certain conditions. Subsequently, a number of federal courts have ruled that various state takeover statutes were unconstitutional insofar as they apply to corporations incorporated outside the state of enactment. Should any person seek to apply any state takeover law, the Purchaser will take reasonable efforts to resist such application, which may include challenging the validity or applicability of any such statute in appropriate court proceedings. In the event it is asserted that one or more state takeover laws is applicable to the Offer or the Merger, and an appropriate court does not determine that it is inapplicable or invalid as applied to the Offer, the Purchaser might be required to file certain information with, or receive approvals from, the relevant state authorities. In addition, if enjoined, the Purchaser might be unable to accept for payment or pay for any Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer or be delayed in continuing or consummating the Offer and the Merger. In such case, the Purchaser may not be obligated to accept for payment, or pay for, any Shares tendered. See Section 14.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Offer to Purchase (Best Buy Co Inc), Offer to Purchase (Best Buy Co Inc)