Common use of Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference Clause in Contracts

Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference. Prior to June 1, the evaluator and educator hold a final summative evaluation conference to review the outcome of the initial conference, artifacts and/or evidence prepared by the educator, student growth data, and observation reports as appropriate. This summative evaluation conference enables the educator to point out important aspects of his or her work as well as essential areas of growth. The educator will present his/her student growth data relative to his/her goals in Criterion 3 or 6. This data will be used to evaluate the student growth component of TPEP using the student growth rubrics. Criterion scores, including instructional and student growth rubrics, will be determined by an analysis of evidence. The Summative score reported to OSPI is the Summative score earned on the most recent Comprehensive Evaluation Cycle. Should an educator provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen focused criterion, a Distinguished score may be awarded by the evaluator for that year. Ratings shall be based upon the preponderance of evidence and its relationship to the state developed rubric. When there is an even number of components within a criterion, a split score, or evidence is unclear, the educator and evaluator may use one or more of the following to determine the criterion score:  Have further discussion about the specific components; or  Provide additional convincing evidence or artifacts, if relevant; or  Conduct additional observations if the criterion can be evaluated by observation. The educator signs the Focused evaluation; copies are filed with the educator, evaluator, and the District’s Human Resources office. The educator’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the educator may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence and artifacts are not submitted with the report to the MISD Human Resources Department.

Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference. Prior to June 1, the evaluator and educator hold a final summative evaluation conference to review the outcome of the initial conference, artifacts and/or evidence prepared by the educator, student growth data, and observation reports as appropriate. This summative evaluation conference enables the educator to point out important aspects of his or her the educator’s work as well as essential areas of growth. The educator will present his/her the educator’s student growth data relative to his/her the educator’s goals in Criterion 3 or 6. This data will be used to evaluate the student growth component of TPEP using the student growth rubrics. Criterion scores, including instructional and student growth rubrics, will be determined by an analysis of evidence. The Summative score reported to OSPI is the Summative score earned on the most recent Comprehensive Evaluation Cycle. Should an educator provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen focused criterion, a Distinguished score may be awarded by the evaluator for that year. Ratings shall be based upon the preponderance of evidence and its relationship to the state developed rubric. When there is an even number of components within a criterion, a split score, or evidence is unclear, the educator and evaluator may use one or more of the following to determine the criterion score:  • Have further discussion about the specific components; or  • Provide additional convincing evidence or artifacts, if relevant; or  • Conduct additional observations if the criterion can be evaluated by observation. The educator signs the Focused evaluation; copies are filed with the educator, evaluator, and the District’s Human Resources office. The educator’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the educator may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence and artifacts are not submitted with the report to the MISD Human Resources Department.