Effect on Operator nominations Clause Samples

The 'Effect on Operator nominations' clause defines how certain events or actions impact the nominations made by the Operator, typically regarding the scheduling or allocation of resources such as gas, electricity, or other commodities. In practice, this clause outlines the procedures to follow if circumstances change after the Operator has submitted its nominations, such as adjustments due to force majeure, changes in demand, or operational constraints. Its core function is to ensure that all parties understand how nominations may be modified or nullified under specific conditions, thereby providing clarity and reducing disputes related to resource allocation or delivery obligations.
Effect on Operator nominations. (a) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Capacity Assessment Notice is given to the Access Holder in accordance with the Conditional Access Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3; and (ii) if the Access Holder disputes the Capacity Assessment Notice, two Business Days after the resolution of the Dispute, the Access Holder may notify Aurizon Network and each affected Operator in accordance with clause 4.5(a) to vary the Access Rights which the Access Holder has allocated to an Operator to take into account the variation to the Conditional Access Rights under the Conditional Access Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3. (b) Except to the extent that the Access Holder has given a notice as contemplated in clause 9.3(a) in respect of the variation to the Conditional Access Rights under the Conditional Access Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3 for each affected Train Service Type, the variation to the Conditional Access Rights for each affected Train Service Type: (i) are deemed to reduce the Access Rights for that Train Service Type for which the Access Holder has not nominated an Operator; and (ii) if, after the operation of clause 9.3(b)(i), there remains an Over- Allocation for the relevant Train Service Type, clause 4.7 applies in respect of that Over-Allocation.
View SourceView Similar (11)
Effect on Operator nominations. (a) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Capacity Assessment Notice is given to the End User; and (ii) if the End User gives the Aurizon Network a Dispute Notice referred to in clause 7.6(a) or the End User is otherwise invited to participate in the dispute resolution process under the relevant Other Conditional Access Holder’s Access Agreement in accordance with clause 7.6(d), two Business Days after the resolution of the Dispute, the End User may give notice to Aurizon Network and each affected Operator in accordance with clause 3.4(a) to vary the Access Rights which the End User has allocated to an Operator to take into account the variation to the Conditional Access Rights under this clause 7. (b) Except to the extent that the End User has given a notice as contemplated in clause 7.8(a) in respect of the variation to the Conditional Access Rights under this clause 7 for each affected Train Service Type, the variation to the Conditional Access Rights for each affected Train Service Type: (i) firstly, are deemed to reduce the Access Rights for that Train Service Type for which the End User has not nominated an Operator; and (ii) if, after the operation of clause 7.8(b)(i), there remains an Over- Allocation for the relevant Train Service Type, clause 3.6 applies in respect of that Over-Allocation. (c) As soon as practicable after the expiry of the period referred to in clause 7.8(a), Aurizon Network must, in respect of each Train Service Type affected by the variation to the Conditional Access Rights: (i) issue a notice to the End User setting out the changes to the “Nominated Monthly Train Services (for a 30 day Month)” set out in schedule 2 of this Agreement; and (ii) issue a notice to each affected Operator and the End User setting out the changes to the “Nominated Monthly Operational Rights (for a 30 day Month)” in schedule 2 of the relevant affected Operator’s Train Operations Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Effect on Operator nominations. (a) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Capacity Assessment Notice is given to the End UserAccess Holder in accordance with the Conditional Access Provisions; and
View Source
Effect on Operator nominations. (a)(c) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Resumption Notice a notice triggering a proposed resumption is given to the End UserAccess Holder; and (ii) if the End UserAccess Holder gives a notice in accordance with clause 1.1 Disputingdisputes a proposed resumption, two Business Days after the resolution of the Dispute, the End UserAccess Holder may give notice to Aurizon Network and each affected Operator in accordance with clause 4.4(a) to vary the Access Rights which the End UserAccess Holder has allocated to an Operator to take into account the Resumed Access Rightsany resumption of Access Rights determined or agreed under the Resumption Provisions.
View Source
Effect on Operator nominations. (a) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Resumption Notice is given to the End User; and (ii) if the End User gives a notice in accordance with clause 6.5 Disputing a proposed resumption, two Business Days after the resolution of the Dispute, the End Userthe Access Holder may give notice to Aurizon Network and each affected Operator in accordance with clause 3.4(a)4.5(a) to vary the Access Rights which the End UserAccess Holder has allocated to an Operator to take into account the Resumed Access Rights.any resumption of Access Rights determined or agreed under the Resumption Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3 or as determined under the relevant dispute resolution process. (c) Except to the extent that the End UserAccess Holder has given a notice as contemplated in clause 6.7(a) in respect of the Resumed Access Rights, the Resumed8(b), the resumption of Access Rights for each Train Service Type: (i) firstly, are deemed to reduce the Access Rights for that Train Service Type for which the End UserAccess Holder has not nominated an Operator; and (ii) if, after the operation of clause 6.7(b)(i) 8(c)(i), there is an Over- Allocation for the relevant Train Service Type, clause 3.64.7 applies in respect of that Over-Allocation.
View Source
Effect on Operator nominations. (a)(c) Within the later of: (i) two Business Days after the Resumption Notice a notice triggering a proposed resumption is given to the End UserAccess Holder; and (ii) if the End UserAccess Holder gives a notice in accordance with clause 1.1 Disputingdisputes a proposed resumption, two Business Days after the resolution of the Dispute, the End UserAccess Holder may give notice to Aurizon Network and each affected Operator in accordance with clause 4.4(a) to vary the Access Rights which the End UserAccess Holder has allocated to an Operator to take into account the Resumed Access Rightsany resumption of Access Rights determined or agreed under the Resumption Provisions.
View Source

Related to Effect on Operator nominations

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of: i. Prohibiting the use of all forms of tobacco products, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, water pipes (hookah), bidis, kreteks, electronic cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snuff and chewing tobacco; ii. Designating the property to which this Policy applies as a "designated area,” which must at least comprise all buildings and structures where activities funded under this Grant Agreement are taking place, as well as Grantee owned, leased, or controlled sidewalks, parking lots, walkways, and attached parking structures immediately adjacent to this designated area; iii. Applying to all employees and visitors in this designated area; and iv. Providing for or referring its employees to tobacco use cessation services. B. If Grantee cannot meet these minimum standards, it must obtain a waiver from the System Agency.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.