Efficiency and Effectiveness. What have been the key outputs of the projects? - Is output delivery on schedule? Are there any delays? What have been the main challenges in the delivery of these outputs? - What has been the nature and quality of interaction and collaboration at the national and regional levels, in particular what partnerships have been established with other development partners - Which activities and use of the produced output were the most/least effective in contributing to the projects’ objectives and why? What are their common quality aspects and challenges? - What have been the key achievements and challenges of the 3 projects at the different levels (organisational/UNESCO, national/institutional, local/beneficiaries)? - What are the main factors that have facilitated or obstructed the achievement of outcomes? - Are adequate monitoring tools and mechanisms in place, and functional? Do they allow communication and exchange of lessons learned between the different projects? - Are the established quality assurance mechanisms adequate? - Have the existing monitoring and evaluation mechanisms contributed to the achievement of expected results throughout the project implementation and how have these been effective? How could these work better for future interventions? - Have the projects achieved the intended targets as agreed by UNESCO and the Donor? - Have the projects been implemented in a cost efficient manner? - What are the main factors that facilitate or threaten the (financial, political and institutional) sustainability of the outcomes of the projects and activities? - What are the main challenges in safeguarding the sustainability of projects? - To what extent is the current funding structure foreseen in the Fund appropriate, is it focused enough to determine its effects/impact? - Are the newly developed advocacy and teaching materials considered in the education reform /policy debate, for piloting and /or rolling out/disseminating at national level? - What was the potential for mobilizing further partners and donors and synergies with other programmes? - What are the main lessons learnt from the programmes that could be documented? On that basis, to what extent could the programmes be scaled up or replicated in other regions? - To what extent have national authorities/stakeholders/beneficiary countries (e.g. MoE) been involved in the design, planning and implementation phases of the projects and to what extent have they gained a sense of ownership of the interventions? - To what extent do the outcomes of the projects fit into future/emerging priority frameworks of the respective countries? Are there intentions / signs for replication or scaling up? - Has the training of trainees or other mechanisms to ensure multiplier effects been ensured? - To what extent and how UNESCO field offices were involved into the implementation of the projects? Do they fit into broader priorities of the respective field office?
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Framework Agreement, Framework Agreement