NIST Cybersecurity Framework The U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Version 1.1.
Legal Framework 1. This programme agreement shall be read in conjunction with the following documents which, together with this programme agreement, constitute the legal framework of the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021: (a) Protocol 38c to the EEA Agreement on the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021; (b) the Regulation on the implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) issued by the Donor States in accordance with Article 10(5) of Protocol 38c; (c) the Memorandum of Understanding on the Implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 (hereinafter referred to as the “MoU”), entered into between the Donor States and the Beneficiary State; and (d) any guidelines adopted by the FMC in accordance with the Regulation. 2. In case of an inconsistency between this programme agreement and the Regulation, the Regulation shall prevail. 3. The legal framework is binding for the Parties. An act or omission by a Party to this programme agreement that is incompatible with the legal framework constitutes a breach of this programme agreement by that Party.
Framework This Agreement establishes a framework that will enable Red Hat to provide Software and Services to Client. “Software” means Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and other software programs branded by Red Hat, its Affiliates and/or third parties including all modifications, additions or further enhancements delivered by Red Hat. The specific services (the “Services”) and/or Software that Red Hat will provide to Client will be described in an Order Form, signed by the parties or otherwise accepted by Red Hat, which may consist of (a) one or more mutually agreed order forms, statements of work, work orders or similar transaction documents, or (b) an order placed by Client through Red Hat's online store accessible from a Red Hat website. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement will govern all purchases and use by Client of Software and Services unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.
Product Quality Isoprene, (hereinafter referred to as “Product”) supplied and maintained on consignment at Belpre in accordance with Article 6, and will be in accordance with specifications set forth in Exhibit A. Seller will facsimile to the Buyer at time of shipment a Certificate of Analysis (COA). Seller will provide Buyer six (6) months advanced notification if there is a change in the manufacturing process that will affect the material specifications of Product provided to the Buyer. Product produced by the Seller in different plants is viewed as coming from different supply sources and requires separate qualifications. Product to be shipped for the Seller from third parties must be from a third party qualified by the Buyer based on Buyer’s criteria as specified in Exhibit B. Buyer will have the right to confirm each such shipment-conforms to the agreed specification; Seller must obtain approval prior to shipment any material that does not meet the Buyers specifications. If Seller deliveries Product failing to comply with the specifications set out in Exhibit A, Seller will reimburse Buyer for freight expenses associated with such shipment and be entitled at its option to i) require Seller to replace such defective Product at a price not to exceed the invoice value or ii) to reimburse the invoice value of the defective Product. If, Buyer has cause to complain that the quality of Product delivered to it pursuant to the Contract does not comply with the specification set out in Exhibit A, Buyer will give written notice specifying the nature of its complaint and the parties will promptly meet so as to resolve that complaint. In absence of any agreement to resolve the complaint the parties will appoint at their joint cost a mutually acceptable independent surveyor to examine whether the quality of Product as delivered complied with the specifications set forth in Exhibit A. In the absence of any written notice from Buyer to Seller within 30 days after delivery of the Product, the Product shall be deemed to have been delivered and accepted by Buyer in a satisfactory condition and in all respects in accordance with the specifications and Seller shall have no liability to Buyer with respect to that delivery.