end if Clause Samples

The 'end if' clause serves as a marker to indicate the conclusion of a conditional statement in programming or scripting languages. It is used to clearly define where the block of code governed by an 'if' condition ends, ensuring that only the intended statements are executed when the condition is met. By explicitly marking the end of a conditional block, this clause helps prevent logical errors and enhances code readability, making it easier to maintain and debug complex scripts.
end if. Algorithm 1: Implementing ND-broadcast in BAMPn,t[t < n/3] When a process pi wants to ND-broadcast a message whose content is vi, it broadcasts the message ND INIT(i, vi) (line 1). When a process receives a message ND INIT(j, −) for the first time, it broad- casts a message ND ECHO(j, v) where v is the data content of the ND INIT() message (line 2). If the message ND INIT(j, v) received is not the first message ND INIT(j, −), pj is Byzantine and the message is discarded. Finally, when pi has received the same message ND ECHO(j, v) from (n − t) different processes, it locally ND-delivers MSG(j, v) (lines 3-4). The algorithm considers an instance of ND-broadcast, i.e., a correct process invokes at most once ND-broadcast. Adding a sequence number to each message allows each process to ND-broadcast a sequence of messages. Theorem 1. Algorithm 1 implements ND-broadcast in the system model BAMPn,t[t < n/3]. 1A similar vocabulary will be used for the abstractions MV-broadcast and SMV-broadcast introduced in Section 3. Proof To prove the ND-termination property, let us consider a non-faulty process pi that ND-broadcasts the message MSG(vi). As pi is non-faulty, the message ND INIT(i, vi) is received by all the non-faulty processes, which are at least (n − t), and every non-faulty process broadcasts ND ECHO(i, vi) (line 2). Hence, each non-faulty process receives the message ND ECHO(i, vi). from (n − t) different processes. It follows that every non-faulty process eventually ND-delivers the message MSG(i, vi) (lines 3-4). To prove the ND-no-duplicity property, let us assume by contradiction that two non-faulty processes pi and pj ND-deliver different messages m1 and m2 from some process pk (i.e., m1 = MSG(k, v) and m2 = MSG(k, w), with v /= w). It follows from the predicate of line 3, that pi received ECHO(k, v) from a set of (n − t) distinct processes, and pj received ECHO(k, w) from a set of (n − t) distinct processes. As n > 3t, it follows that the intersection of these two sets contains a non-faulty process. But, as it is non-faulty, this sent the same message ND ECHO() to pi and pj (line 2). Hence, m1 = m2, which contradicts the initial assumption. To prove the ND-validity property, we show that, if Byzantine processes forge and broadcast a message ND ECHO(i, w) such that pi is correct and has never invoked ND broadcast MSG(w), then no correct process can ND-deliver MSG(i, w). Let us observe that at most t processes can broadcast the message ND ECHO(i, w). As ...
View SourceView Similar (3)
end if. Network participants perform faultCorr(·) Ui−1 performs sendSK(·) function
View Source

Related to end if

  • Information About You and Your Visits to the Website All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy. By using the Website, you consent to all actions taken by us with respect to your information in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

  • Feedback You have no obligation to provide us with ideas, suggestions, or proposals (“Feedback”). However, if you submit Feedback to us, then you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license that is sub-licensable and trans- ferable, to make, use, sell, have made, offer to sell, import, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, or publicly perform the Feedback in any manner without any obligation, royalty, or restriction based on intellectual property rights or otherwise.

  • Helpdesk Customers must contact LightEdge Support to report service trouble or an outage with LightEdge Technical Support. LightEdge Technical Support will be available seven (7) days per week; twenty-four (24) hours per day; three hundred sixty-five days (365) days per year. LightEdge Technical Support provides support for network monitoring, trouble ticket resolution, and fault isolation up to the termination point of LightEdge provided Equipment. LightEdge Technical Support will accept trouble and outage related support calls from any customer representative. LightEdge will not perform any requested activity which may cause Service disruption or perform any changes to Service unless request is initiated by an Authorized Contact. LightEdge reserves the right to delay response on support tickets opened by anyone other than the Authorized Contact. Communication between Customer and LightEdge not initiated by Authorized Contact will not be subject to SLA remedies. All communications with Customer will be in the English language.

  • Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Recipient should encourage its employees, subrecipients, and contractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Recipient should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.