Enforcement of Exelixis Sole Patents Sample Clauses

The "Enforcement of Exelixis Sole Patents" clause defines the rights and responsibilities related to protecting patents that are owned exclusively by Exelixis. Typically, this clause outlines the procedures for identifying potential infringements, the process for initiating legal action, and the allocation of costs and recoveries associated with enforcement efforts. For example, it may specify whether Exelixis has the sole authority to decide if and when to sue an infringer, or if the other party must be notified or consulted. The core function of this clause is to ensure that Exelixis retains control over the defense and enforcement of its intellectual property, thereby protecting its proprietary technologies and commercial interests.
Enforcement of Exelixis Sole Patents. (i) Enforcement by [*]. In the event that management or in-house counsel for any Party becomes aware of a suspected infringement by a Third Party of a Patent claiming a Sole Invention owned by EPC that claims the composition of matter (including formulation), manufacture or use of one or more Products that is being Developed or Commercialized by BMS or its Affiliate or sublicensee using Diligent Efforts and which is exclusively licensed to BMS under Section 7.1(c) (for purposes of this Section 7.8(a)(i) only, an “Exelixis Sole Patent”), such Party shall notify the other Parties promptly, and following such notification, the Parties shall confer. As between EXEL and EPC, EXEL shall carry out the patent enforcement activities on behalf of EPC under this 7.8, and shall pay costs and expenses on behalf of EPC in connection therewith. Each Party of EXEL and BMS shall provide the same level of disclosure to the other Party’s in-house counsel concerning suspected infringement of an Exelixis Sole Patent as such Party would provide with respect to suspected infringement of its own issued Patent or an exclusively licensed issued Patent claiming a product it is developing or commercializing independent of this Agreement. Where such suspected infringement involves such Third Party’s development, manufacture, use or sale of a product directed against ROR, [*] shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to bring an infringement action against any such Third Party or to defend such proceedings at its own expense, in its own name and entirely under its own direction and control. [*] shall reasonably assist [*] (at [*] expense) in such actions or proceedings if so requested, and EPC shall lend its name to such actions or proceedings if requested by [*] or required by law, and [*] shall hold [*] harmless from any liability incurred by [*] arising out of any such proceedings or actions at [*] request. [*] have the right to participate and be represented in any such suit by its own counsel at its own expense. No settlement of any such action or defense which restricts the scope, or adversely affects the enforceability, of any such Exelixis Sole Patent may be entered into by [*] without the prior consent of [*] (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned).
View SourceView Similar (7)
Enforcement of Exelixis Sole Patents 
View SourceView Similar (5)

Related to Enforcement of Exelixis Sole Patents

  • Enforcement of Patent Rights 2.10.1 If either party hereto learns at any time of any infringement or threatened infringement by any other person of any enforceable Patent Rights owned by or licensed to the other party after the Effective Date, that party shall give notice of that infringement or threatened infringement to the other party. The parties shall then consult together as to the best course of action to pursue in response to such potential infringement, but neither party shall be obligated to institute legal action at its own expense. A good faith failure by one party to provide such notice to the other party shall not be deemed a breach of this Agreement and shall not give rise to a right of action by other party. 2.10.2 In the event that the parties do not reach an agreement as contemplated by Section 2.10.1 hereof as to the best course of action to pursue with respect to a potential infringement (i) Licensor shall have the right, but not the obligation, to institute legal action, through counsel of its own choosing and at its sole expense, to restrain any infringement or threatened infringement, or to recover damages therefor, of its enforceable Patent Rights, and (ii) Licensee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to institute legal action, through counsel of its own choosing and at its sole expense, to restrain any infringement or threatened infringement, or to recover damages therefor, of its enforceable Patent Rights in the Licensed Field. The party that bears the expenses of pursuing legal action against a third party infringer shall be entitled to any damages, lost profits or other monies recovered by judgment, decree, settlement, arbitration or otherwise, resulting from such legal action. 2.10.3 In the event that one party elects to institute legal action against a third party infringer, the other party shall fully cooperate in the prosecution of such action including joining as a party in suit when necessary to acquire standing to institute legal action pursuant to this Section 2.10; provided, however, that such other party shall be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing such cooperation including its reasonable legal fees and expenses. The electing party shall reimburse the other party for all such expenses within thirty (30) days after its receipt of an invoice from the other party that describes such expenses in reasonable detail, with supporting documentation as appropriate.

  • Enforcement of Patents As between the Parties, (i) Prosecuting Party pursuant to 6.2.2 shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to prosecute any Infringement with respect to the Exclusive Licensed Patents including as a defense or counterclaim in connection with any Third Party Infringement Claim, at Prosecuting Party’s sole cost and expense, using counsel of Prosecuting Party’s choice and (ii) MedImmune shall have the sole right, but not the obligation, to prosecute Infringement with respect to the Non-Exclusive Licensed Technology, including as a defense or counterclaim in connection with any Third Party Infringement Claim, at MedImmune’s sole cost and expense, using counsel of its choice. For purposes of this Section 6.3, the Party prosecuting any Infringement pursuant to the foregoing sentence with respect to a Patent shall be the “Enforcing Party.” In the event MedImmune prosecutes any such Infringement in the Field in the Territory, Licensee shall have the right to join as a party to such claim, suit or proceeding and participate with its own counsel at its sole cost and expense; provided that MedImmune shall retain control of the prosecution of such claim, suit or proceeding, including the response to any defense or defense of any counterclaim raised in connection therewith. In the event Licensee prosecutes any such Infringement in the Field in the Territory, MedImmune shall have the right to join as a party to such claim, suit or proceeding and participate with its own counsel at its sole cost and expense; provided that Licensee shall retain control of the prosecution of such claim, suit or proceeding, including the response to any defense or defense of any counterclaim raised in connection therewith. If the Enforcing Party or its designee does not take commercially reasonable steps to prosecute an Infringement in the Field (x) within [***] days following the first notice provided above with respect to such Infringement or (y) provided such date occurs after the first such notice of such Infringement is provided, [***] Business Days before the time limit, if any, set out in appropriate laws and regulations for filing of such actions, whichever comes first, then (1) the Enforcing Party shall so notify the non-Enforcing Party and (2) subject to any rights of any Third Parties under any In-License Agreements (or other applicable Third Party agreements existing as of the Effective Date) and upon the Enforcing Party’s written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the non-Enforcing may prosecute such alleged or threatened infringement in the Field at its sole cost and expense, whereupon the non-Enforcing Party shall be deemed the Enforcing Party with respect to such Infringement.

  • Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights I will cooperate fully with the Company, both during and after my employment with the Company, with respect to the procurement, maintenance and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Company-Related Developments. I will sign, both during and after the term of this Agreement, all papers, including without limitation copyright applications, patent applications, declarations, oaths, assignments of priority rights, and powers of attorney, which the Company may deem necessary or desirable in order to protect its rights and interests in any Company-Related Development. If the Company is unable, after reasonable effort, to secure my signature on any such papers, I hereby irrevocably designate and appoint each officer of the Company as my agent and attorney-in-fact to execute any such papers on my behalf, and to take any and all actions as the Company may deem necessary or desirable in order to protect its rights and interests in any Company-Related Development.

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Joint Patent Rights If not already established under the Research Collaboration Agreement, prior to either Party filing any Patent Right disclosing Joint Program Technology or Joint Probody Platform Improvements, the Parties shall establish a patent committee (the “Patent Committee”) comprised of at least one (1) representative of each Party for the purpose of facilitating the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance and defense of Joint Patent Rights. As agreed upon by the Parties, meetings of the Patent Committee may be face-to-face or may be conducted by teleconferences or videoconferences, from time to time as needed. The Patent Committee will be the forum through which the Parties coordinate their respective obligations to each other described in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 hereof and in this Section. In the event the Parties conceive or generate any Joint Program Technology or Joint Probody Platform Improvements, the Parties shall promptly meet to discuss and determine, based on mutual consent, whether to seek patent protection thereon, which Party will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents and how to pay for the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents. It is presumed that ImmunoGen will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Program Technology or Joint Conjugation Probody Platform Improvements, and that CytomX will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Unconjugated Probody Platform Improvements. Neither Party will file any Joint Patent Right without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Party controlling filing and prosecution of any such Joint Patent Right (a) shall keep the other Party informed regarding each Patent Right, (b) shall consider in good faith any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to the filing, prosecution or maintenance of any such Patent Right and (c) shall not unreasonably refuse to incorporate any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to such filing, prosecution or maintenance.