Environmental Review Process Sample Clauses

Environmental Review Process. 8.2.1 As a “designated project”, as defined in the IAA, has its own process under the auspices of a different federal authority than the Minister, sections 8.2.2 - 8.2.7, and 8.3 do not apply to a designated project, and any similar concept in any amended, succeeding, or replacement Law. 8.2.2 Sections 8.2.3 - 8.2.7 only apply to the Decision Maker’s environmental review process with respect to a Project and do not limit the processes or powers of any other federal authority with assessment responsibilities for such Project. 8.2.3 If the Lessee considers that a proposed Project is an Exempt Project, then it will provide the Decision Maker (and, if the Minister is the Decision Maker, then also the First Nation) sufficient information about the proposed Project for the Decision Maker to determine if the Project is an Exempt Project. If the Decision Maker determines that the proposed Project is an Exempt Project, then further review of such Project is not required and sections 8.2.4 - 8.2.7, and 8.3 do not apply to such Project.‌ 8.2.4 The Lessee will provide the Decision Maker (and, if the Minister is the Decision Maker, then also the First Nation) all information about a proposed Project reasonably required by the Decision Maker, including: 8.2.4.1 an environmental site assessment of the environmental condition of the Premises affected by such Project, stating that it may be relied upon by all Parties; 8.2.4.2 a Development Plan consistent with the Project; and 8.2.4.3 an environmental review report of such Project, to enable the Decision Maker to determine the environmental effects of such Project: 8.2.4.4 as the Decision Maker may by Law be required to make; or 8.2.4.5 in the reasonable discretion of the Decision Maker, if the First Nation takes over the position of the Lessor under this Lease by operation of law and no Law requires a determination. 8.2.5 If the Decision Maker is not reasonably satisfied with any information provided under section 8.2.4, then the Decision Maker will notify the Lessee of each inadequacy (and, if the Minister is the Decision Maker, provide a copy of such notification to the First Nation). The Lessee will ensure that the inadequacies are addressed to the reasonable satisfaction of the Decision Maker, which revised information the Lessee will provide to the Decision Maker (and, if the Minister is the Decision Maker, then also to the First Nation.) 8.2.6 If the Decision Maker determines that the Project may proceed, then the Le...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Environmental Review Process. 1. DWR and the PWAs agree that this AIP is intended to be used during the environmental review process for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to define the proposed project description for the purposes of CEQA, and to permit the next steps of the SWP water supply contract amendment process, including scoping and the preparation of the EIR. The AIP principles are not final contract language and do not represent a contractual commitment by either DWR or the PWAs to approve any proposed project or to sign contract amendments. By concurring with the AIP, DWR and the PWAs express their intent to move forward with the CEQA process with DWR as lead agency and the PWAs as responsible agencies, and ultimately develop a proposed project consisting of contractual amendments consistent with the AIP principles and prepare the EIR for consideration by DWR and the PWAs. 2. At the end of the CEQA process and in compliance with CEQA, DWR and the PWAs will each individually evaluate the EIR and contract amendments, exercise their independent judgment, and determine whether or not to certify the EIR, approve the proposed project and sign the contract amendments or to approve an alternative project. Consequently, even though DWR and the PWAs have agreed to the AIP for the purposes described in the preceding paragraphs, DWR and each PWA retain their full discretion under CEQA to consider and adopt mitigation measures and alternatives, including the alternative of not going forward with the proposed project.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Environmental Review Process. DWR and the PWAs agree that this AIP is intended to be used during the environmental review process for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to define the proposed project description for the purposes of CEQA, and to permit the next steps of the SWP water supply contract amendment process, including scoping and the preparation of the EIR. The AIP principles are not final contract language and do not represent a contractual commitment by either DWR or the PWAs to approve any proposed project or to sign contract amendments. By concurring with the AIP, DWR and the PWAs express their intent to move forward with the CEQA process with DWR as lead agency and the PWAs as responsible agencies, and ultimately develop a proposed project consisting of contractual amendments consistent with the AIP principles and prepare the EIR for consideration by DWR and the PWAs.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Environmental Review Process. In accordance with CEQA and the University of California Procedures for the Implementation of CEQA, the UCSB 1990 Long Range Development Plan ("the LRDP" ) was approved and the accompanying LRDP EIR ( "LRDP EIR, " SCH#87022516) was certified by 109 The Regents in June 1990. The Project is included in, and is generally consistent with, the 1990 LRDP. Nonetheless, UCSB has proposed to amend the text of the 1990 LRDP in response to a California Coastal Commission request to include a more precise description of the rock revetment proposed as part of this project. The language contained in the amendment removes reference to the conceptual cobblestone revetment described in the LRDP and incorporates the proposed rock revetment structure included in the Seawater System Renewal Project. The LRDP Amendment amends the Coastal Act Element, Part 2, Chapter VI. Marine Resources; Section
View Source
Environmental Review Process. 8.3.1 As a “designated project”, as defined in the IAA, has its own process under the auspices of a different federal authority than the Minister, sections 8.3.2 - 8.3.7, 8.4, and 8.5 do not apply to a designated project, and any similar concept in any amended, succeeding, or replacement Law.123
View Source
Environmental Review Process. A. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) Process 1. Once a Maritime Industrial Related Development Proposal receives direction to proceed with the CEQA analysis in a Negative Declaration and/or Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed project will be evaluated as a part of the CEQA review process to determine whether it is consistent with or obstructs implementation of the applicable ten CERP Actions and MCAS goals and objectives, along with all applicable regulations. 2. Port District staff will request to be on the next agenda during the public review period and make reasonable efforts to attend at least one community meeting of neighboring residents (such as to the following groups: Maritime Stakeholder Forum, AB 617 CSC, Barrio ▇▇▇▇▇ Community Group, or National City Planning Commission) and present a project overview and results of the Initial Study including identification of potential impacts and their proposed mitigation measures for all impacted resource areas, such as air quality, transportation, and land use. a. Results of the review for consistency or obstruction of the MCAS Goals and Objectives and the ten CERP Actions will be disclosed, and the audience directed to the location within the Initial Study, typically the Air Quality section, where this information can be found. b. All reasonable efforts will be made to present to a community group during the public review period. B. Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) Process 1. Once a Maritime Industrial Related Development Proposal receives direction to proceed with CEQA analysis in an Environmental Impact Report, the proposed project will be evaluated as a part of the CEQA review process to determine whether it is consistent with or obstructs implementation of the applicable ten CERP Actions and MCAS goals and objectives, along with all applicable regulations. 2. Port District staff will request to be on the next agenda during the public review period and attend at least one community meeting of neighboring residents (including but not limited to the following groups: Maritime Stakeholder Forum, AB 617 CSC, Barrio ▇▇▇▇▇ Community Planning Group, National City Planning Commission) and present a project overview and results of the EIR including identification of potential impacts and their proposed mitigation measures for all impacted resource areas, such as air quality, transportation and land use. a. Results of the review for consistency or obstruction of the MCAS Goals a...
View Source
Environmental Review Process 
View Source

Related to Environmental Review Process

  • Environmental Review From the date of this Agreement through the Notification Date Buyer may conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, subject to the following: (a) Buyer shall have the right to conduct on-site inspections, including, but not limited to, Phase I testing (but not Phase II testing) (as those terms are defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials) environmental assessments of the Assets, including, but not limited to, sampling and analysis of soil, air, surface water, groundwater and waste materials, prior to the end of the Notification Date (“Buyer’s Environmental Review”) and Seller shall provide to Buyer a copy of any environmental review Seller has in its possession subject to the same terms of confidentiality subsequently set forth herein; (i) The cost and expense of Buyer’s Environmental Review shall be borne solely by Buyer; (ii) All inspections must be coordinated through a designated representative of Seller who may accompany Buyer during the course of Buyer’s inspection of the Assets; (iii) Buyer shall give Seller notice not less than 48 hours before any visits by Buyer and/or its consultant to the Assets, and Buyer shall seek and obtain Seller’s prior consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld) before either Buyer or Buyer’s consultant enters the Assets; (iv) Buyer shall provide Seller a copy of any Phase I reports affecting the Assets promptly after Buyer’s receipt of the same; (v) Buyer and/or its consultant shall perform all such work in a safe and workmanlike manner, shall not unreasonably interfere with Seller’s operations, and shall comply with all Laws of applicable Governmental Authorities; (vi) Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any third party consents that are required in order to perform any work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review; and (vii) Buyer hereby agrees to release and defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Seller and Seller’s Representatives from and against all Claims made by (or attributable to the acts or omissions of) Buyer or Buyer’s Representatives (INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING FROM THE SOLE, JOINT, OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE (BUT NOT WILLFUL MISCONDUCT), STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER LEGAL FAULT OF SELLER OR ANY OF SELLER’S REPRESENTATIVES) arising out of or relating to Buyer’s Environmental Review. The release and indemnity provisions of this Section 4.09 shall survive termination or Closing of this Agreement notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided for in this Agreement. (b) Unless otherwise required by applicable Laws, Buyer shall treat any matters revealed by Buyer’s Environmental Review and any environmental review provided by Seller to Buyer, including any analyses, compilations, studies, documents, reports, or data prepared or generated from such review, but excluding any public information (the “Environmental Information”), as confidential, and, except as provided below, Buyer shall not disclose any Environmental Information to any Governmental Authority, or, prior to Closing to any other third party without the prior written consent of Seller. Buyer may use the Environmental Information prior to Closing only in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Environmental Information shall be disclosed by Buyer to only those persons who need to know the Environmental Information for purposes of evaluating the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, and who agree to be bound by the terms of this Section 4.09. If Buyer or any third party to whom Buyer has provided any Environmental Information is requested, compelled, or required to disclose any of the Environmental Information prior to Closing, Buyer shall provide Seller with prompt notice sufficiently prior to any such disclosure so as to allow Seller to file for any protective order, or seek any other remedy, as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the Closing, upon Seller’s request Buyer shall deliver the Environmental Information, and all copies thereof and works based thereon, to Seller, which Environmental Information shall become the sole property of Seller. Upon request Buyer shall provide copies of the Environmental Information to Seller without charge. The terms and provisions of this Section 4.09(b) shall survive any termination of this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary.