Errors in Payment Orders Sample Clauses

The "Errors in Payment Orders" clause defines how mistakes in payment instructions are identified and addressed between parties. It typically outlines the responsibilities of both the sender and the recipient in verifying payment details, and may specify procedures for correcting errors, such as misdirected funds or incorrect amounts. This clause ensures that there is a clear process for resolving payment discrepancies, thereby minimizing financial risk and promoting trust in financial transactions.
Errors in Payment Orders. Customer agrees that Bank shall have no obligation to discover errors in Payment Orders and shall not be liable to Customer for errors made by Customer, including but not limited to errors made in identifying the beneficiary, or an intermediary or beneficiary’s bank, or for errors in the amount of the Payment Order. Bank shall likewise have no duty to discover and shall not be liable for duplicate Payment Orders issued by Customer. In the event that Customer makes an error or issues a duplicate Payment Order, Customer shall indemnify, defend all claims, and hold Bank harmless from any loss, damages, or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, incurred by Bank as the result of completion of the funds transfer.
Errors in Payment Orders. Company agrees that Financial Institution shall have no obligation to discover errors in Payment Orders and shall not be liable to Company for errors made by Company, including but not limited to errors made in identifying the beneficiary, or an intermediary or beneficiary’s financial institution, or for errors in the amount of the Payment Order. Financial Institution shall likewise have no duty to discover and shall not be liable for duplicate Payment Orders issued by Company. In the event that Company makes an error or issues a duplicate Payment Order, Company shall indemnify, defend all claims, and hold Financial Institution harmless from any loss, damages, or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, incurred by Financial Institution as the result of completion of the funds transfer.
Errors in Payment Orders. If a Payment Order describes the payee inconsistently by name and account number, (i) payment may be made on the basis of the account number even if you identify a person different from the named payee; or (ii) Rippling may, in its sole discretion, refuse to accept or may return the Payment Order. If a Payment Order describes a participating financial institution inconsistently by name and identification number, the identification number may be relied upon as the proper identification of the financial institution. If a Payment Order identifies a non-existent or unidentifiable person or account as the payee or the payee’s account, Rippling may, in its sole discretion, refuse to accept or may return the Payment Order.

Related to Errors in Payment Orders

  • ALL-IN PAYMENTS It is agreed all-in payments breach the award and this Agreement. All-in payments to employees will not be made. Where it is alleged all-in payments are being made, the provisions of the VBIA shall apply.

  • Certain Payments Without the prior consent of the Dealer Manager, none of the Company, the Advisor or any of their respective affiliates will make any payment (cash or non-cash) to any associated Person or registered representative of the Dealer Manager.

  • CALL-IN PAY 14.01 An employee who is called in to work outside their regularly scheduled hours shall be paid a minimum of four (4) hours pay at their applicable rate whenever there is a break between the employee's regularly scheduled hours and the work the employee is called to perform.

  • Delay in Payment Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary in this Agreement, the BEP, or any other plan, contract, program or otherwise, the Company (and its affiliates) are expressly authorized to delay any scheduled payments under this Agreement, the BEP, and any other plan, contract, program or otherwise, as such payments relate to the Executive, if the Company (or its affiliate) determines that such delay is necessary in order to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. No such payment may be delayed beyond the date that is six (6) months following the Executive’s separation from service (as defined in Section 409A). At the end of such period of delay, the Executive will be paid the delayed payment amounts, plus interest for the period of any such delay. For purposes of the preceding sentence, interest shall be calculated using the six (6) month Treasury ▇▇▇▇ rate in effect on the date on which the payment is delayed, and shall be compounded daily. If the conditions of the severance exception under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii) (or any successor Regulation thereto) are satisfied, payment of benefits shall not be delayed for six (6) months following termination of employment to the extent permitted under the severance exception.

  • Reinstatement; Certain Payments If any claim is ever made upon any Secured Party for repayment or recovery of any amount or amounts received by such Secured Party in payment or on account of any of the Obligations, such Secured Party shall give prompt notice of such claim to each other Agent and Lender and the Administrative Borrower, and if such Secured Party repays all or part of such amount by reason of (i) any judgment, decree or order of any court or administrative body having jurisdiction over such Secured Party or any of its property, or (ii) any good faith settlement or compromise of any such claim effected by such Secured Party with any such claimant, then and in such event each Loan Party agrees that (A) any such judgment, decree, order, settlement or compromise shall be binding upon it notwithstanding the cancellation of any Indebtedness hereunder or under the other Loan Documents or the termination of this Agreement or the other Loan Documents, and (B) it shall be and remain liable to such Secured Party hereunder for the amount so repaid or recovered to the same extent as if such amount had never originally been received by such Secured Party.