Evaluation Cycles. 21.2.1 Probationary tenure-track faculty shall be evaluated during the second (2nd), fourth (4th), and sixth (6th) years of their probationary period. A third (3rd) or fifth (5th) year evaluation may be requested by the department personnel committee, the department chair, the college personnel committee, or the ▇▇▇▇ if a faculty member’s performance is judged to be substandard or deficient in the second (2nd) or fourth (4th) year review cycle. Any time an evaluation is judged to be substandard or deficient, the faculty member shall meet with their chair and department personnel committee and develop a plan for rectifying any noted issues. Evaluation for reappointment shall occur during fall quarter as established in the Academic Calendar. 21.2.2 Probationary tenure-track faculty who apply for promotion and/or tenure shall be evaluated during winter quarter, as established in the Academic Calendar. When tenure is denied during his or her mandatory review, normally in the sixth (6th) year, the faculty member shall be reappointed to a terminal year of employment. 21.2.3 In the fifth (5th) year following the granting of tenure, faculty, including those in phased retirement, will submit their Professional Records for Post-TR during the fall quarter, and every fifth (5th) year thereafter, as established in the Academic Calendar. Promotion in rank shall be considered the equivalent of Post-TR, and a subsequent Post-TR will occur five (5) years following the promotion. (a) Within three (3) weeks after notification is received from the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, tenured faculty who are “continued with reservations” shall construct, in collaboration with their department chair and department personnel committee, a Professional Development Plan to be submitted to the ▇▇▇▇ for approval. The Professional Development Plan, along with the faculty member’s subsequent workload plan, will form the basis for the follow-up review by the department personnel committee, department chair, and ▇▇▇▇. The Professional Development Plan will include the date of the faculty member’s follow-up review. (b) Tenured faculty who are “continued with reservations” shall be reevaluated based on the Professional Development Plan no later than the fourth (4th) academic quarter following their receipt of notice. “Continued with reservations” is the outcome of a personnel evaluation and as such is a Substantive Academic Judgment as defined in ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement