Common use of Evaluation Format and Procedure Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Format and Procedure. The evaluation format and procedure shall be in accordance with the Board’s policies and state and federal law. In the event that the Board determines that the performance of the Superintendent is unsatisfactory in any respect, it shall describe in writing, in reasonable detail, specific instances of unsatisfactory performance. The evaluation shall include recommendations as to areas of improvement in all instances where the Board deems performance to be unsatisfactory. A copy of the written evaluation shall be delivered to the Superintendent. The Superintendent shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation. That response shall become a permanent attachment to the evaluation in the Superintendent’s personnel file. Within thirty (30) days of the delivery of the written evaluation to the Superintendent, the Board shall meet with the Superintendent to discuss the evaluation. The Board shall devote a portion of, or all of, one executive session annually to a discussion of the working relationship between the Superintendent and the Board. It is also agreed that the Superintendent and Board will hold at least a semi-annual evaluation conference with a format agreeable to both sides. In the event the Board deems that the evaluation instrument, format, and/or procedure is to be modified by the Board and such modifications would require new or different performance expectations, such modifications must be adopted with input from the Superintendent and the Superintendent shall be provided a reasonable period of time to demonstrate such expected performance before being evaluated.

Evaluation Format and Procedure. The evaluation format and procedure shall be developed by the Board, and shall be in accordance with the Board’s policies and mandatory state and federal law, to the extent such exist. In the event that Board members, collectively or individually, as a part of the Board determines evaluation process, determine that the performance of the Superintendent is unsatisfactory in any respect, it shall describe in writing, in reasonable detail, the criteria deemed to contain deficiencies, and shall, to the extent possible, identify specific instances of unsatisfactory performanceperformance provided by any Board member. The evaluation shall may include recommendations as to areas of improvement in all instances where the Board deems or individual Board members deem performance to be unsatisfactory, but the Superintendent shall be expected to know how to improve his job performance once deficiencies are pointed out to him. A copy of the written evaluation shall be delivered to the Superintendent. The Superintendent shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation. That response shall become a permanent attachment to the evaluation in the Superintendent’s personnel file. Within thirty (30) days of the delivery of the written evaluation to the Superintendent, the Board shall meet in executive session with the Superintendent to discuss the evaluationevaluation and the Superintendent’s working relationship with all Board members. The Board may adopt the completed evaluation in an open meeting, provided however, that such adoption shall devote not make the evaluation a portion of, or all of, one executive session annually to a discussion of the working relationship between the Superintendent and the Board. It is also agreed that the Superintendent and Board will hold at least a semi-annual evaluation conference with a format agreeable to both sidespublic document. In the event the Board deems that the evaluation instrument, format, and/or procedure is to be modified by the Board and such modifications would require new or different performance expectations, such modifications must be adopted with input from the Superintendent and the Superintendent shall be provided a reasonable period of time time, in the discretion of the Board, to demonstrate such expected performance before being evaluated.