Evaluation Handbook Clause Samples

Evaluation Handbook. The Lane Community College faculty Developmental Evaluation and Corrective Evaluation processes are the product of a collaborative faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and the Association have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and Association will regularly review this Handbook and solicit suggestions for its improvement. Any proposed changes to the Handbook will be submitted to the Association and College labor relations representative for timely review for conformance with collectively bargained Agreements.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of this Agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented. Teacher evaluations shall follow the requirements as set out in SDCL Ch. 13-42.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Handbook. All teachers new to the District will receive a copy of the evaluation handbook as part of the new employee packet. Other teachers may request a copy of the evaluation handbook from the District.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Handbook. The District in collaboration with the Association shall create and finalize an evaluation handbook as a reference tool by December 31, 2020.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of the negotiated agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Handbook. The Southwestern Oregon Community College faculty evaluation 9 (tenure track and tenured evaluation) processes are the product of a collaborative 10 faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and 11 administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which 12 will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of 13 the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and 14 the Faculty Senate have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying 15 statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and
View Source

Related to Evaluation Handbook

  • Employee Handbook (A) If the Contractor has an employee handbook, the Contractor shall include the following information: (1) A specific discussion of the False Claims Act established under Sections 3729 through 3733 of Title 31 of the United States Code, administrative remedies for false claims and statements established under Chapter 38 of Title 31, United States Code, any state laws pertaining to civil or criminal penalties for false claims and statements, and whistleblower protections under such laws, with respect to the role of such laws in preventing and detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs; (2) The rights of employees to be protected as whistleblowers; and (3) The Contractor’s policies and procedures for detecting and preventing Fraud, Waste, and ▇▇▇▇▇.

  • Company Policies and Procedures 7.1.1 The Company will ensure that Employees are able to readily access Company policies and procedures that apply to the Employees. 7.1.2 The Employees will observe and act in accordance with Company policies and procedures that apply to the Employees, as implemented and amended from time to time.

  • Department Review The parties shall resolve disputes through written submission of their dispute to the Department’s Contract Manager. The Department shall respond to the dispute in writing within ten (10) Business Days from the date that the Department’s Contract Manager receives the dispute. The Department’s decision shall be final unless a party provides the other party with written notice of the party’s disagreement with the decision within ten (10) Business Days from the date of the Department’s decision. If a party disagrees with the Department’s decision, the party may proceed to subsection (b) below.

  • Policies and Procedures i) The policies and procedures of the designated employer apply to the employee while working at both sites. ii) Only the designated employer shall have exclusive authority over the employee in regard to discipline, reporting to the College of Nurses of Ontario and/or investigations of family/resident complaints. iii) The designated employer will ensure that the employee is covered by WSIB at all times, regardless of worksite, while in the employ of either home. iv) The designated employer will ensure that the employee is covered by liability insurance at all times, regardless of worksite, while in the employ of either home. v) The designated employer shall have exclusive authority over the employee’s personnel files and health records. These files will be maintained on the site of the designated employer.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.