Common use of Evaluation Meetings Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Meetings. 22.2.1. The first evaluation will rank Proposers based on the scores from the selection criteria point values. 22.2.2. Following the initial evaluation process, the short-listed proposer(s) may be required to provide an on-site interview/presentation. 22.2.3. Such subsequent evaluations are to be accomplished by simply ranking the Proposers based off the details provided through the on-site interview/presentation. Proposers will be ranked in sequential order with one (1) being the highest ranking. Proposers' rankings will then be totaled with the total lowest scores receiving final rank order starting with one (1) that shall indicate the highest technically evaluated and most qualified Proposer by the evaluation committee. 22.2.4. Proposed short-list and final selection meeting dates are posted on the Procurement Management web page: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Projects, Award Pending.)

Evaluation Meetings. 22.2.123.2.1. The first evaluation will rank Proposers based on the scores from the selection criteria point values. 22.2.223.2.2. Following the initial evaluation process, the short-listed proposer(s) may be required to provide an on-site interview/presentation. 22.2.323.2.3. Such subsequent evaluations are to be accomplished by simply ranking the Proposers based off the details provided through the on-site interview/presentation. Proposers will be ranked in sequential order with one (1) being the highest ranking. Proposers' ’ rankings will then be totaled with the total lowest scores receiving final rank order starting with one (1) that shall indicate the highest technically evaluated and most qualified Proposer by the evaluation committee. 22.2.423.2.4. Proposed short-list and final selection meeting dates are posted on the Procurement Management web page: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Projects, Award Pending.)

Evaluation Meetings. 22.2.1. The first evaluation will rank Proposers based on the scores from the selection criteria point values. 22.2.2. Following the initial evaluation process, the short-listed proposer(s) may be required to provide an on-site interview/presentation. 22.2.3. Such subsequent evaluations are to be accomplished by simply ranking the Proposers based off the details provided through the on-site interview/presentation. Proposers will be ranked in sequential order with one (1) being the highest ranking. Proposers' ’ rankings will then be totaled with the total lowest scores receiving final rank order starting with one (1) that shall indicate the highest technically evaluated and most qualified Proposer by the evaluation committee. 22.2.4. Proposed short-list and final selection meeting dates are posted on the Procurement Management web page: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Projects, Award Pending.)