Common use of Evaluation Procedures Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining unit members shall be evaluated annually by members of the Center administrative staff. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members only, the Center may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more years service appointed by the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a copy of the evaluation report (including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the forms. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining ‌ 9.1 The major objectives of the evaluation process are to ensure that the District has highly competent and qualified academic staff, to improve individual performance, and to encourage professional growth. 9.2 The selection of the evaluator and observer (may be the same individual) will be made by the ▇▇▇▇ or designee. Unit members will be evaluated during the first semester of employment at their assigned classroom or worksite, including online for distance education courses. Subsequent evaluations will be performed, at a minimum, every six semesters of employment. It is recommended that all unit members shall be evaluated annually by members during the first semester of any new assignment. For the purpose of this Agreement, subsequent semesters shall not include the summer intersession. At the discretion of the Center administrative staffdepartment chair, lead instructor, ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate vice president, additional student evaluations and classroom/worksite visitations may be completed. B. With respect 9.3 Evaluations will consist of the following components: a. a classroom or worksite observation; b. student surveys when appropriate; c. review of sample materials relevant to probationary bargaining the assignment (syllabi, course materials, lesson plans, education plans, librarian chat room transcripts, etc.); d. an administrative review of workplace performance; and e. at the option of the unit member, additional information relevant to the assignment may also be submitted, such as professional development activities, governance assignments, or other professional efforts that have not been recognized since the unit member’s last evaluation period. The District will negotiate any evaluation forms with the Association for input regarding the evaluation criteria for unit members onlyas reflected in this Agreement prior to the implementation of the forms. This does not apply to modifications that are purely format, the Center may seek student input structural, or modality. The District will provide training to all evaluators and observers on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining process outlined in this Article. 9.4 The unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student member scheduled for evaluation shall be part notified by the fourth (4th) week (of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two full sixteen (216)-week semester, or shortened proportionally for shorter sessions) or more years service appointed by after the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director start of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, tosemester. The notification will include that the unit member has been scheduled for an evaluation and provided with the identity of the proposed observer. Upon notification, if necessarythe unit member believes the proposed observer is biased against them, amend and/or update then the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited unit member may request to the student evaluation form. Providedtheir ▇▇▇▇, howeverin writing, that an alternate observer be designated. Any change in observer will be at the initial student evaluation form shall be discretion of the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each▇▇▇▇. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a A copy of the evaluation report (procedure, including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereoncriteria, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At provided to the end unit member at the time of notification of the contract year (August 31), evaluation. Evaluative comments must be supported by the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At direct observations or other documented information since any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsevaluation. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved 9.5 Process and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.Criteria for Evaluation

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining 1. A pre-observation conference shall be held between the supervising administrator and unit member to review the evaluation process using the Pre-Observation Check Off Sheet, Initial Conference Form and self-evaluation prepared by the unit member. a. The unit member and supervising administrator shall agree on which class period or service shall be evaluated. b. In addition to an observation, the supervising administrator shall examine a sample of data as applicable (i.e. projects, forms, webpages). c. Class periods or services may be observed. d. Permanent unit members, in years three (3) and above, and the supervising administrator shall decide which two (2) of the evaluation categories shall be evaluated. All unit members shall be evaluated annually by members of the Center administrative staff. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members only, the Center may seek student input on the Ancillary Duties and Responsibilities. Each evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation cycle shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely focus on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more categories that were not seen in the prior evaluation. In the event of an unsatisfactory rating in an evaluation category during the prior evaluation, the category shall be re-evaluated in the current evaluation cycle. e. Probationary unit members and unit members in years service appointed by the Alliance one and administrators appointed by the Director two (1-2) shall be evaluated in writing annually for their performance on each of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation formcategories. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining All unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members evaluated on Ancillary Duties and provided an opportunity Responsibilities. 2. A concluding conference shall be held to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of review the completed Evaluation Form which includes a written waiver thereofsummary, commendations and recommendations, evaluation ratings, a discussion of next steps for professional development and the bargaining re-evaluation of unsatisfactory category(ies) in the next evaluation cycle. 3. Observed behavior, which is to be cited by the supervision administrator in the evaluation and that was not seen during a formal observation shall be brought to the attention of the unit member shall be accorded a period of within five (5) work days of its occurrence. 4. Each unit member has the right to submit any make a written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a copy of any evaluative material within the evaluation report (school year. This response, including any student evidence cited in the response, shall be attached to and filed with the original document. 5. The evaluation summary) with bargaining forms shall be signed by the supervising administrator and the unit member responseafter the evaluation conference, to confirm receipt. 6. The evaluation form with attachments, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and filed in the unit member's personnel file. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the forms. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request7. The bargaining principal or site administrator is responsible for the evaluations at the school sites and district office. Director of Maintenance and Operations shall evaluate the OSS unit member may members not request that assigned to a school site or district office. 8. An administrator is the only some of the student evaluation summaries be removedperson who will evaluate custodial or maintenance site team members. Team members with “Lead” designations are not supervisors and do not conduct evaluations.

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining Each permanent unit member shall be evaluated by his/her primary evaluator at least every other school year, or, pursuant to Education code section 44664(a) (3), may be evaluated at least every five years. If the evaluator and the unit member agree, the Certificated Agreement for Five Year Evaluation Cycle form will be completed based on the following criteria; (1) Has been employed at least ten consecutive years with the District (2) Is highly qualified as required by NCLB (3) Has received a “Proficient/Meets Standards” rating on the unit member’s most recent evaluation The unit member or the evaluator may withdraw consent to the Certificated Agreement for Five Year Evaluation Cycle form at any time. B. Each temporary and probationary unit member shall be evaluated on a continuing basis. A formal evaluation shall be completed each school year. Each temporary or probationary unit member being evaluated shall have at most two formal scheduled classroom observations and two unscheduled classroom observations; however, if the unit member receives “Unsatisfactory/Not Meeting Standards” in any of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) in one of the observations, additional formal observations may be conducted, until a subsequent observation indicates proficiency/meets standards. C. Temporary and probationary unit members shall turn in to their administrator, copies of their lesson plan book on a weekly basis until the completion of their first formal observation. If the unit member receives an unsatisfactory/not meeting standards in any of the standards in his/her first observation, the evaluator may require the unit member to continue to submit lesson plans, until a subsequent observation indicates proficiency /meets standards. All copies of the lesson plan books shall be returned to the unit member at the end of the school year. All other unit members shall be evaluated annually responsible for preparing lesson plans and have their lesson plan book available on their desk for review by members of the Center administrative staff. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members onlysite administrator; however, the Center may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions they shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit required to turn in lesson plans. Unit members with will turn in a two (2) or more years service appointed by the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director of the Center shall convene annually prior day emergency substitute plan to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of administrator within five (5) teaching days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following after the five (5) day response period, a copy beginning of the evaluation report (including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, first and second semesters. A copy will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the forms. E. Nothing shall also be placed in a bargaining the unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removedmembers’ Substitute Binder.

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining 9.1 The major objectives of the evaluation process are to ensure that the District has highly competent and qualified academic staff, to improve individual performance, and to encourage professional growth. 9.2 The selection of the evaluator and observer (may be the same individual) will be made by the ▇▇▇▇ or designee. Unit members will be evaluated during the first semester of employment at their assigned classroom or worksite, including online for distance education courses. Subsequent evaluations will be performed, at a minimum, every six semesters of employment. It is recommended that all unit members shall be evaluated annually by members during the first semester of any new assignment. For the purpose of this Agreement, subsequent semesters shall not include the summer intersession. At the discretion of the Center administrative staffdepartment chair, lead instructor, ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate vice president, additional student evaluations and classroom/worksite visitations may be completed. B. With respect 9.3 Evaluations will consist of the following components: a. a classroom or worksite observation; b. student surveys when appropriate; c. review of sample materials relevant to probationary bargaining the assignment (syllabi, course materials, lesson plans, education plans, librarian chat room transcripts, etc.); d. an administrative review of workplace performance; and e. at the option of the unit member, additional information relevant to the assignment may also be submitted, such as professional development activities, governance assignments, or other professional efforts that have not been recognized since the unit member’s last evaluation period. The District will negotiate any evaluation forms with the Association for input regarding the evaluation criteria for unit members onlyas reflected in this Agreement prior to the implementation of the forms. This does not apply to modifications that are purely format, the Center may seek student input structural, or modality. The District will provide training to all evaluators and observers on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining process outlined in this Article. 9.4 The unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student member scheduled for evaluation shall be part notified by the fourth (4th) week (of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two full sixteen (216)-week semester, or shortened proportionally for shorter sessions) or more years service appointed by after the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director start of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, tosemester. The notification will include that the unit member has been scheduled for an evaluation and provided with the identity of the proposed observer. Upon notification, if necessarythe unit member believes the proposed observer is biased against them, amend and/or update then the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited unit member may request to the student evaluation form. Providedtheir ▇▇▇▇, howeverin writing, that an alternate observer be designated. Any change in observer will be at the initial student evaluation form shall be discretion of the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each▇▇▇▇. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a A copy of the evaluation report (procedure, including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereoncriteria, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At provided to the end unit member at the time of notification of the contract year (August 31), evaluation. Evaluative comments must be supported by the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At direct observations or other documented information since any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsevaluation. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved 9.5 Process and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.Criteria for Evaluation

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining 9.1 The major objectives of the evaluation process are to insure that the District has highly competent and qualified academic staff, to improve individual performance, and to encourage professional growth. 9.2 The unit member’s immediate department chair or lead full-time faculty or designee shall perform formal evaluations. A unit member shall be notified as to who his/her evaluator is prior to the observation/evaluation. Upon notification, if the unit member believes the proposed evaluator is biased against the unit member, then the unit member may request to his/her ▇▇▇▇ that an alternate evaluator be designated. Any change in evaluator will be at the discretion of the ▇▇▇▇. The District will review any evaluation forms with the Association for input prior to the implementation of the forms. 9.3 Evaluations shall consist of a visitation/observation by the evaluator and/or the ▇▇▇▇, student surveys when appropriate, with an optional response to the visitation/observation and student surveys by the unit member. 9.4 The unit member scheduled for evaluation shall be notified by the fourth (4th) week (of a full sixteen (16)-week semester, or shortened proportionally for shorter sessions) of the unit member’s having commenced instruction. A copy of the evaluation procedure, including evaluation criteria, shall be provided to the unit member at the time of notification. 9.5 Unit members shall be evaluated annually by members a classroom or work site (for example for counselors and librarians) visitation/observation and student survey during the first semester of employment. Subsequent evaluations shall, at a minimum, include student surveys and classroom/worksite visitations/observation at least once every six semesters of employment beginning the fall 2011 semester. At the discretion of the Center administrative staffdepartment chair, lead instructor, ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate vice president additional student evaluations and classroom/worksite visitations may be completed. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members onlya. Visitation/observation process–a classroom (physical or electronic) or worksite will be visited by an evaluator, as described below, who completes a formal evaluation and confers with the Center associate faculty member. 1. The ▇▇▇▇, or designee, will select the course(s) or timeframe in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place so the faculty member may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student be observed under conditions commensurate with his/her assignment. 2. Each evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluationbased upon at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. Tenure decisions shall not Evaluations are to be based solely predominantly on student evaluationsthe observation. C. A committee comprised equally 3. The criteria for evaluation may include: a) Demonstrated skill in classroom teaching, counseling or library work. These may include: (1) Currency and depth of bargaining unit members with two knowledge in the primary areas of responsibility; (2) or more years service appointed by Use of effective communication, written and oral; (3) Careful attention to effective organizational skill; (4) Creativity and innovation. b) Respect for students’ rights and needs by: (1) Demonstrating patience, fairness, and promptness in the Alliance evaluation and administrators appointed by the Director discussion of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited student work; (2) Sensitivity and responsiveness to the student evaluation form. Providedneeds of individual students and their special circumstances, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior when appropriate; (3) Maintaining contractual obligation to December 1, 2004teaching and worksite hours. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members (4) Demonstrating sensitivity to human and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five cultural diversity; (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following Acknowledging and defending the five free inquiry of students in the exchange of criticism and ideas; (56) day response period, a copy Recognition of the evaluation report (including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At the end opinions of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsothers. E. Nothing shall be placed c) Respect for colleagues and the educational profession by: (1) Acknowledging and defending the free inquiry of colleagues in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved exchange of criticism and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.ideas;

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining unit members shall be evaluated annually by members 9.1 The major objectives of the Center administrative evaluation process are to insure that the District has highly competent and qualified academic staff, to improve individual performance, and to encourage professional growth. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members only, the Center may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining 9.2 The unit member’s annual evaluationimmediate department chair or lead full-time faculty or designee shall perform formal evaluations. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more years service appointed by the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days notified as to submit any written response who his/her evaluator is prior to the observation/evaluation. Upon notification, if the unit member believes the proposed evaluator is biased against the unit member, then the unit member may request to his/her evaluation▇▇▇▇ that an alternate evaluator be designated. Following Any change in evaluator will be at the five (5) day response period, a copy discretion of the ▇▇▇▇. The District will review any evaluation report forms with the Association for input prior to the implementation of the forms. The selection of the evaluator and observer (including any student evaluation summarymay be the same individual) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and filemade by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designee. Unit members will be evaluated during the first semester of employment at their assigned classroom or worksite. Subsequent evaluations will be performed, at a minimum, every six semesters of employment. It is recommended that all unit members be evaluated during the first semester of any new assignment. For the purpose of this Agreement, subsequent semesters shall not include the summer intersession. At the end discretion of the contract year (August 31)department chair, lead instructor, ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate vice president, additional student evaluations and classroom/worksite visitations may be completed. 9.3 Evaluations shall consist of a visitation/observation by the individual evaluator and/or the ▇▇▇▇, student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior surveys when appropriate, with an optional response to the destruction visitation/observation and student surveys by the unit member. Evaluations will consist of the forms, following components: a. a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual classroom or worksite observation; b. student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the forms. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.surveys when appropriate;

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining unit members 1. Each non-probationary faculty member will participate in an annual faculty evaluation process designed to assist the member in improving their performance and professional development as educators in helping the Institute’s students obtain a high quality education. Annual evaluations are part of the Institute’s continuous improvement program. a. Each year the Institute will publish the evaluation packet which shall include all deadlines, the evaluation form including the Faculty Planning Worksheet, and the evaluation rubric. The packet will be made available by December 1 for the current evaluation year. b. The evaluation criteria for non-probationary faculty shall be evaluated annually by members based on the faculty member’s performance of the Center administrative staff. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members onlyresponsibilities enumerated in subsection B.1.b. Faculty Responsibilities, the Center may seek student input on comments and goals documented in the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit memberprior year’s annual evaluation, the Faculty Planning Worksheet, and any additional requests made by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ throughout the year. Tenure decisions shall not Any such additional requests must be documented in writing. Lecturers will be evaluated based solely on student evaluationsteaching only, and Senior Lecturers will be evaluated based on teaching and service only. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more years service appointed c. Faculty will submit a Faculty Annual Report and Faculty Planning Worksheet to the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ by the Alliance and administrators appointed date set by the Director of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, but no earlier than the Center shall convene annually prior last Friday in January. The ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ and faculty member will meet to December 1discuss the Report and the Worksheet. When the faculty member is on leave, tothe ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will discuss the Report and Worksheet through telephone or other real time communication technology, and other appropriate communication methods, if necessary. The ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will then provide the faculty member with a written evaluation and Worksheet. d. The Worksheet may be modified during the year: 1. at the request of the faculty member with approval of the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ or 2. by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ to respond to changes in Program, amend and/or update School, or Institute needs. Additional requests during the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited year and modifications to the student evaluation formWorksheet must be documented in writing and will be preceded by a discussion between the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ and faculty member. ProvidedIf the faculty member is not in agreement with the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ concerning the additional requests or changes made to the Faculty Planning Worksheet during the year, they may take any concerns to the ▇▇▇▇ and then to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. These meetings do not require Federation representation; however, that a Federation representative may be present at the initial student evaluation form shall be request of either the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004faculty member or the ▇▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a copy of the evaluation report (including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, e. Students will be forwarded asked to complete an Institute course evaluation for administrative review each class and file. At the end of faculty member and the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year Administration will be destroyed. At any time prior have access to the destruction of results, except that for the formsquestions added by faculty for their own purpose, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to access may be restricted by the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsfaculty member. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining 9.1 The major objectives of the evaluation process are to insure that the District has highly competent and qualified academic staff, to improve individual performance, and to encourage professional growth. 9.2 The selection of the evaluator and observer (may be the same individual) will be made by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designee. Unit members will be evaluated during the first semester of employment at their assigned classroom or worksite. Subsequent evaluations will be performed, at a minimum, every six semesters of employment. It is recommended that all unit members shall be evaluated annually by members during the first semester of any new assignment. For the purpose of this Agreement, subsequent semesters shall not include the summer intersession. At the discretion of the Center administrative staffdepartment chair, lead instructor, ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate vice president, additional student evaluations and classroom/worksite visitations may be completed. B. With respect 9.3 Evaluations will consist of the following components: a. a classroom or worksite observation; b. student surveys when appropriate; c. review of sample materials relevant to probationary bargaining the assignment (syllabi, course materials, lesson plans, education plans, etc.); d. an administrative review of workplace performance; and e. at the option of the unit member, additional information relevant to the assignment may also be submitted, such as professional development activities, governance assignments, or other professional efforts that have not been recognized since the unit member’s last evaluation period. The District will negotiate review any evaluation forms with the Association for input regarding the evaluation criteria for unit members only, the Center may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and as reflected in this Agreement prior to the extent indicated herein such student implementation of the forms. This does not apply to modifications that are purely format, structural, or modality. 9.4 The unit member scheduled for evaluation shall be part notified by the fourth (4th) week (of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluations. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two full sixteen (216)-week semester, or shortened proportionally for shorter sessions) or more years service appointed by after the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director start of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1semester, tothe unit member will be notified that they have been scheduled for an evaluation and provided with the identity of the proposed observer. Upon notification, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss each. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereof, the bargaining unit member shall believes the proposed observer is biased against them, then the unit member may request to their ▇▇▇▇ that an alternate observer be accorded a period designated. Any change in observer will be at the discretion of five (5) days to submit any written response to his/her evaluationthe ▇▇▇▇. Following the five (5) day response period, a A copy of the evaluation report (procedure, including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereoncriteria, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior provided to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to at the Center, time of notification. Evaluative comments must be allowed to inspect supported by the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous direct observations or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsdocumented information since any prior evaluation. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved 9.5 Process and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.Criteria for Evaluation

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining unit members 1. Each non-probationary faculty member will participate in an annual faculty evaluation process designed to assist the member in improving their performance and professional development as educators in helping the Institute’s students obtain a high quality education. Annual evaluations are part of the Institute’s continuous improvement program. a. Each year the Institute will publish the evaluation packet which shall include all deadlines, the evaluation form including the Faculty Planning Worksheet, and the evaluation rubric. The packet will be made available by December 1 for the current evaluation year. b. The evaluation criteria for non-probationary faculty shall be evaluated annually by members based on the faculty member’s performance of the Center administrative staffresponsibilities enumerated in subsection B.1.b. Faculty Responsibilities, the comments and goals documented in the prior year’s annual evaluation, the Faculty Planning Worksheet, and any additional requests made by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ throughout the year. Any such additional requests must be documented in writing. Lecturers will be evaluated based on teaching only, and Senior Lecturers will be evaluated based on teaching and service only. B. With respect c. Faculty will submit a Faculty Annual Report and Faculty Planning Worksheet to probationary bargaining unit members onlythe ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ by the date set by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, but no earlier than the last Friday in January. The ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ and faculty member will meet to discuss the Report and the Worksheet. When the faculty member is on leave, the Center ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will discuss the Report and Worksheet through telephone or other real time communication technology, and other appropriate communication methods, if necessary. The ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will then provide the faculty member with a written evaluation and Worksheet. d. The Worksheet may seek student input be modified during the year: 1. at the request of the faculty member with approval of the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ or 2. by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ to respond to changes in Program, School, or Institute needs. Additional requests during the year and modifications to the Worksheet must be documented in writing and will be preceded by a discussion between the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ and faculty member. If the faculty member is not in agreement with the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ concerning the additional requests or changes made to the Faculty Planning Worksheet during the year, they may take any concerns to the ▇▇▇▇ and then to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. These meetings do not require Federation representation; however, a Federation representative may be present at the request of either the faculty member or the ▇▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. e. Students will be asked to complete an Institute course evaluation for each class and the faculty member and the Administration will have access to the results, except that for the questions added by faculty for their own purpose, access may be restricted by the faculty member. f. Evaluations with Less Than Satisfactory Rating(s) 1. In the event that a faculty member does not receive a satisfactory rating in each of the three primary responsibilities set forth in Article V Section B.1.b., the faculty member will have one week from the discussion with the ▇▇▇▇ to raise concerns to the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. If the faculty member is not satisfied with the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ response, the faculty member will have one week to raise concerns to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ decision on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluationsratings is final. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more years service appointed by . Once the Alliance and administrators appointed by evaluation is final, the Director of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form shall faculty member will be the form developed by said committee prior to December 1, 2004. D. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with copies of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided given an opportunity to discuss eacha plan to improve performance and development with the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇. Subsequent to such discussionsThis discussion must take place within one week of the original evaluation meeting, or the final decision of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, whichever is later. a. The plan may involve recommendations such as: ● Further evaluation in the following semester, ● Completing a course or a research component designed to improve technical competency in the faculty member’s field or in their practice of teaching, paid for by the Institute, ● Faculty mentoring by a mutually acceptable faculty member of suitable rank and experience, ● A review of facilities and equipment to determine what classroom/laboratory changes/upgrades may be required to support improvement, ● Completing training in emergent classroom or discipline technologies, paid for by the Institute, ● A planned visit to the class, lab, or shop by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ or their designee with a subsequent meeting (usually within five working days of the planned visit) to discuss the visitor’s observations. The meeting does not require Federation representation; however, a Federation representative may be present at the request of the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ or faculty member. 3. If the faculty member and ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ are not able to agree on receipt a plan to improve performance and development within one week after the evaluation meeting (or the final decision of the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇), the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will implement an improvement plan. The ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇’▇ plan will include specific recommendations and/or requirements for performance improvement. If the faculty member is not in agreement with the plan developed by the ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇, they may take any concerns within one week to the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ decision on the plan is final. These discussions do not require Federation representation; however, a Federation representative may be present at the request of either the faculty member or the Vice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 4. During the evaluation year, upon the written request of a written waiver thereoffaculty member to their ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇, the bargaining unit member shall ▇▇▇▇ and/or Associate ▇▇▇▇ will discuss the faculty member’s progress towards improvement. This discussion will occur in a reasonable amount of time taking into consideration breaks and scheduled time away from campus, but no later than 30 days from the request. 2. Wentworth may make reasonable changes in the evaluation procedures or instruments applying the performance criteria, as specified in section 1.a. above, after consultation with the Federation. Any changes in the performance criteria will be accorded a period of five (5) days made prior to submit any written response to his/her evaluation. Following the five (5) day response period, a copy July 1 of the evaluation report (including any student evaluation summary) with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, year. No changes will be forwarded for administrative review and filemade after July 1 unless exigent circumstances require said changes. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year All changes will be destroyed. At any time prior promptly distributed to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsfaculty. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.

Evaluation Procedures. A. Bargaining 11.1 Each tenured unit member will be evaluated at least every two years, except where mutually agreed for unit members who qualify for evaluation every five years under the provisions of Education Code 44664. Probationary teachers will be evaluated every year until they receive tenure. The purpose of evaluation is to provide each unit member the opportunity to improve his/her professional skills. 11.1.1 The evaluation process shall be evaluated annually by members a mutually developed process in which both the evaluator and the evaluatee participate equally. Except as provided for in this Article, evaluations will be conducted using the Orchard School District Certificated Evaluation Form [Appendix E], with the goals and objectives determined in accordance with the following California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP): 1. Engaging and supporting all students in learning 2. Creating and maintaining effective environments for student learning 3. Understanding and organizing subject matter for student learning 4. Planning instruction and designing experiences for all students 5. Assessing student learning 6. Developing as a professional educator 11.1.2 Although teachers shall be responsible for their performance in each of the Center administrative staff. B. With respect to probationary bargaining unit members onlyevaluation standards, the Center may seek student input on the evaluation of said probationary bargaining unit members and to the extent indicated herein such student evaluation shall be part concentrated on three of a probationary bargaining unit member’s annual evaluation. Tenure decisions shall not be based solely on student evaluationsthe six evaluation standards, as determined below. C. A committee comprised equally of bargaining unit members with two (2) or more years service appointed by the Alliance and administrators appointed by the Director of the Center shall convene annually prior to December 1, to, if necessary, amend and/or update the Center-wide evaluation of instruction forms including but not limited to the student evaluation form. Provided, however, that the initial student evaluation form 11.2 The evaluator shall be the form developed unit member's immediate supervisor and/or any other management employee who possesses a valid administrative credential and who has been certified by said committee prior to December 1, 2004the Board of Trustees. D. Bargaining unit 11.3 Unit members shall who are to be provided with copies evaluated will be so notified by the appropriate management person no later than the last work day in September of their evaluations including a student evaluation summary for probationary bargaining unit members and provided an opportunity to discuss eacheach calendar year. Subsequent to such discussions, or on receipt of a written waiver thereofNot later than the last working day in October, the bargaining unit member shall make an appointment with his/her evaluator to review and agree on the format as well as the unit member's goals, objectives, or evaluation standards for the evaluation period. 11.4 Unit members who qualify may choose an alternative evaluation format. Such alternative formats include: a) self evaluation b) project-based evaluation c) portfolio evaluation d) experiment-based evaluation e) team project evaluation 11.4.1 Unit members are considered qualified to participate in an alternative evaluation format if they are permanent employees and their three most recent evaluations have been satisfactory. The District and a permanent unit member may also mutually agree that the unit member is qualified to participate in an alternative evaluation format, even if he/she does not have three consecutive satisfactory evaluations, provided that the employee’s most recent evaluation is satisfactory. 11.4.2 Unit members who qualify may not participate in the same alternative evaluation format two consecutive evaluation cycles (e.g. self-evaluation). 11.4.3 The alternative evaluation process will be accorded concluded with an assessment by the member and a period review of five (5) days to submit any written response to the assessment by his or her evaluator. The Evaluator shall identify in writing for both the member and personnel file whether the member has successfully completed his/her evaluation. Following Should the five (5) evaluation be incomplete or unsuccessful, the evaluator may either extend the current evaluation timelines or place the member on the Formal Evaluation track for the subsequent year. 11.5 The order and procedure of evaluation will be as follows: 11.5.1 By the last working day response period, a copy in September - Notification of those unit members who are to be evaluated and the name of the evaluator. By the last working day in October evaluatee and evaluator will meet to review and agree upon the format, CSTP evaluation report (including any student standards or goals and objectives, ways to measure achievement, and the role of the evaluator and evaluatee. For those evaluatees participating in the formal evaluation summary) with bargaining process, classroom observations will be done throughout the year. Observations will be both formal and informal. There will be a minimum of two scheduled formal observations. For those evaluatees participating in an alternative evaluation format, specific goals, objectives, and timelines will be agreed upon between the unit member response, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student evaluation forms for that year will be destroyed. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student evaluation forms upon which the summary of student evaluations included in his/her annual evaluation was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the formsevaluator. E. Nothing shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s file without providing a copy to the bargaining unit member involved and providing the bargaining unit member with an opportunity to respond. After a probationary bargaining unit member has attained tenure, or if such probationary bargaining unit member’s employment with the Center ceases prior to attaining tenure, each student evaluation summary in such bargaining unit member’s file shall be removed upon his/her written request. The bargaining unit member may not request that only some of the student evaluation summaries be removed.