Evaluation Version Sample Clauses

Evaluation Version. If Customer has not placed an Order with Functionize for the commercial version of the Functionize Solution or an Order specifies that Customer only has rights to an Evaluation Version, then Customer’s use of the Functionize Solution shall be for evaluation purposes only (“Evaluation Version”), and Customer acknowledges and agrees that Customer will only access and use the Functionize Solution solely for Customer’s internal evaluation purposes to assess the capabilities of the Functionize Solution against their requirements in determining whether to license the commercial version of the Functionize Solution. All use of the Evaluation Version of the Functionize Solution must be in a non-production, non-commercial environment and not for general production use, subject to any additional limitations or restrictions provided by Functionize in writing when providing Customer with access to the Evaluation Version. Customer’s right to use such Evaluation Version shall only be for the duration of the Evaluation Period set forth in the applicable Order or if no such period is specified, fourteen (14) days (together with any extension of the Evaluation Period that may be expressly authorized by Functionize in writing). In addition and notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms of Service, Customer acknowledges and agrees that (i) the Evaluation Version of the Functionize Solution is provided to Customer “AS-IS,” with no warranties of any kind; (ii) Functionize shall have no indemnification obligations for the Evaluation Version; (iii) Functionize may terminate immediately in the event Functionize has reasonably determined that Customer has committed a breach of Section 2; and (iv) for Evaluation Versions provided to Customer for free, in addition to the termination rights under Section 6, either party may terminate the Evaluation Version license with or without cause effective ten (10) days after giving written notice of termination to the other party. Customer agrees to only provide simulation or historical Customer Data to the Evaluation Version of the Hosted Service, and no data related to current testing activities of Customer’s products or business. CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL CUSTOMER DATA UPLOADED TO OR STORED IN THE EVALUATION VERSION OF THE FUNCTIONIZE SOLUTION DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD WILL BE PERMANENTLY LOST IF CUSTOMER HAS NOT ENTERED INTO AN ORDER FOR THE COMMERCIAL VERSION OF THE FUNCTIONIZE SOLUTION WITH FUNCTIONIZE BEFORE EXPIRATION OF...
View SourceView Similar (3)
Evaluation Version. A copy of a HyperSpace Product in the form of run-time/executable images only (and specifically excluding the Source Materials) distributed at no cost to a prospective Licensee for the purposes of allowing such prospective Licensee the opportunity to evaluate such HyperSpace Product to determine whether to purchase such HyperSpace Product. Each Evaluation Version of a HyperSpace Product contains Time-Based Deactivation Functions.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Evaluation Version. If this License is for an evaluation version, you are authorized to use the Software only for evaluation purposes for a single evaluation period not to exceed 30 days, starting on the day on which you accept this License. Should you require an evaluation period exceeding thirty (30) days, you may contact Software FX, Inc. for an extended evaluation license. Objects produced by Software configured with an evaluation version must contain symbols and text provided by Software FX, Inc. indicating that the object was produced with an evaluation version of the Software. You are not authorized to obtain more than one license for an evaluation version of any Software FX, Inc. Software by subsequent downloads or installations.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Version. A trial version of the Software with full functionality which is licensed at no charge and which is not supported by Licensor. This version is licensed for a period of 30 days only, commencing from requesting an evaluation license. On expiry of the ’30 day’ period, this version will revert to a Demo Version of the Software, unless a Full Version is purchased by Licensee prior to or on such expiry.
View Source
Evaluation Version. If BlueStripe identifies the Software as a demonstration, evaluation, or trial (“Evaluation Version”), You may Install and Access one copy of the Evaluation Version Software for the purpose of evaluation and demonstration only. This one copy of the Evaluation Version Software may not be Installed at, or Accessed by, a service bureau that You may contract with nor shall You use the Software for the purpose of providing a service bureau, third-party hosting, time-sharing, an application service, or similar services for third parties. Additionally, You may not use it for competitive analysis, or commercial, professional, or other for-profit purposes. The Evaluation Version may only be Installed and Accessed for the evaluation period consistent with the duration of the license key provided by BlueStripe. Use of the Software beyond the applicable Evaluation Version license term (evaluation period), or any attempt to defeat the time-control disabling function in the Software is an unauthorized use and constitutes a material breach of this Agreement and a violation of intellectual property law. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both Parties, within five (5) days after the evaluation period, You shall return to BlueStripe or destroy, at BlueStripe’s option, all copies of the Software in Your possession or control, including any and all copies made by You and any Documentation. Upon BlueStripe’s request, You will certify in a written document signed by You that all copies of the Software have been returned to BlueStripe, or destroyed, and that no copies of the Software are in Your possession or control. Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14 shall survive termination of this Agreement.
View Source
Evaluation Version. SeaFEM evaluation version is a fully functional version, except that it has some limitations on the size of the models that can be dealt with. SeaFEM evaluation version can be freely used by USER under the terms of this Agreement. SeaFEM evaluation version can be redistributed provided that it is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
View Source
Evaluation Version. The Software is an early version and has not yet been widely commercially released. It is likely that the Software contains errors. If Licensee is unwilling to accept the risk of such errors, Licensee should not use the Software or sublicense it. Licensee is solely responsible for Licensee’s use of the Software, including sales and sublicenses and Licensee provides Vendor with an indemnity for third-party claims arising from Licensee’s use of and resales of the Software as more fully set forth in Section 7.
View Source
Evaluation Version. The Evaluation Version is a version of the SOFTWARE that allows CUSTOMER to evaluate the functionality of the SOFTWARE including vTools, for a certain period of time, typically for a maximum of one hundred eighty (180) days. To use vTools, the Evaluation Version requires the online activation of a corresponding Evaluation License File. The SOFTWARE may be installed on any number of computers provided that these devices are controlled by CUSTOMER. CUSTOMER's right to use vTools and to create Derivatives is restricted to the purpose of evaluating the SOFTWARE. The use of vTools is limited to five consecutive minutes and will automatically be terminated thereafter. An Evaluation Version prohibits CUSTOMER to use vTools included in the SOFTWARE for any other purposes than those mentioned in this Section 3.1.3, in particular, without limitation, CUSTOMER must not use SOFTWARE provided as an Evaluation Version for commercial purposes, or use the Evaluation Version to develop commercial applications including vTools. The Evaluation Version may be used only in the time period that is specified in the Evaluation License File. After expiration of this time period, vTools included in the SOFTWARE or used in Derivatives will no longer work.
View Source
Evaluation Version. If this License is for an evaluation version, you are authorized to use the Software only for evaluation purposes for a single evaluation period not to exceed 30 days, starting on the day on which you accept this License. Should you require an evaluation period
View Source

Related to Evaluation Version

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Evaluation Procedure 6.1.1 The established evaluation form is to be prepared by the immediate supervisor under whom the bargaining unit member has served for sixty (60) working days or more. (See evaluation form attached as Appendix B.) The immediate supervisor is to present a draft of an evaluation report to the bargaining unit member in private and discuss the report with the bargaining unit member being evaluated. The evaluation shall be based upon direct observation by the immediate supervisor or verified facts. Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does not meet standards” ratings shall include statements of deficiencies and recommendations for improvements, in writing, by the evaluator. The signature by the bargaining unit member does not indicate the employee’s agreement with the ratings; it indicates that the employee has received a copy. 6.1.1.1 Permanent employees shall be evaluated annually. 6.1.1.2 Probationary employees shall be evaluated at least once during the probationary period, prior to the end of the fourth month. 6.1.2 Evaluation reports reflecting “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings shall be placed in the bargaining unit member’s personnel file only after written notification by the supervisor that the bargaining unit member has been given an opportunity to prepare a written response to such evaluation. Prior to evaluation reports reflecting any “Needs Improvement” or “Does Not Meet Standards” ratings the evaluator is encouraged to implement a Performance Improvement Plan. (See Performance Improvement Plan form attached as Appendix C.) 6.1.3 A bargaining unit member has the right to attach a response to the employee’s evaluation provided that such written response is submitted to the employee's supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the employee's receipt of the evaluation. Any timely received response shall be attached to, and become a permanent part of, the employee's evaluation. 6.1.4 Evaluatees may, within ten (10) working days, present the employee’s objections to the evaluation decision to the Director Personnel Services. Grounds for the objections shall be based on one or more of the following: (1) the evaluation was not based on fact; (2) the evaluation was based on discriminatory standards; (3) the evaluation was not conducted in conformance with this Article. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of such objection the Director Personnel Services shall hear the objections and render a decision whether to uphold the evaluation or rescind the evaluation. 6.1.5 The bargaining unit member's supervisor may, at any time, prepare a notice of commendation. The completed form is to be signed by the bargaining unit member to indicate receipt and the bargaining unit member shall be given a signed copy. The original notice is to be forwarded to the Personnel Services Office for filing. 6.1.6 Contents of evaluations are not subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement, Article VII, but procedural violations are subject to the grievance procedure. 6.1.7 The probation period shall be defined as the initial six (6) month employment period. 6.1.8 In the event a permanent bargaining unit member is hired for a new position, and is subsequently released from probation under section 6.1.7, the employee will be returned to the employee’s previous classification. 6.1.9 The District, CSEA and the bargaining unit member may mutually agree to extend the probationary period of a bargaining unit member on an individual basis provided the extension is no longer than four (4) months.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.